We Have A Math Problem

I keep hearing as a response whenever the subject of vaccine deaths and injuries come up "but we've given billions of doses! The numbers are low!"

A couple of problems with this response.

One, vaccine monitoring never used such a calculus to determine whether a vaccine is safe and should be pulled. For example, when the flu vaccine was administered in 1976, I believe 25 people died and hundreds of injuries out of 45 million doses. Small percentage, but it was stopped because it was seen as too risky. Same thing happened in 2009 with the H1N1 vaccine when 700 kids got narcolepsy after taking it.

So the percentage of death and injury to doses given isn't a decisive factor in determining and deciding if a vaccine remains on the market.

Two, I notice people are making a basic mistake. They're say there are 40 000 deaths in the West and the response is the standard 'billion doses served!' 40 000 into 5 billion doses (or whatever it is - and even that number can't be trusted like any Covid statistic the government puts out) is tiny. Except the only data set that should be used is the population of the West since the deaths are for Western countries.

The general number we see is USA/UK/EU and in some cases Australia. No Canada because our system lacks transparency and so our numbers should be viewed with a sharp skeptical eye. 

Population of EU is about 448 million.

USA is 330 million.

UK is 67 million.

This gives a total of 845 million.

So whatever death and adverse events figures are reported should be divided into that number. Not 5 billion.

Now, keep in mind, we're seeing more and more studies showing vaccine related events are under reported anywhere between an order of magnitude of 31 to 100. Recall, a Harvard Pilgrim study showed only 1-10% of events are reported.

So we're playing with really basic and raw figures where we have to pro rate and extrapolate and adjust to what the real figure may be like.

In other words, it's a brutal catastrophe.

I haven't seen the recent numbers but I believe the total official deaths is 40 000 (which has never been seen in medical history) and 4 million injuries.

40 000 into 845 million is .005%. The injuries are at .5%. Both are probably way higher. If we use the the 30% under reported figure, the numbers rise dramatically. 

Already if we take the data at face value the numbers are grim. Start to adjust them to what was found in the studies, and we have a massive societal and medical problem where health officials and science failed on a spectacular level.

The fact agencies still refuse to consider this makes it safe to assert we indeed may be seeing a mass crime against humanity.