2016-11-20

Daily Derp: Very Loooong And Very Derp

Some of these are old news but still worth it. It's a bunch of stories I never got around to posting. Still going to mix in some new stuff like....

Look for the left to suddenly care for debt, deficits, executive orders abuse, and civil liberties with President elect Trump. They couldn't be bothered to care under President Obama.

******

Another day, more hate crimes debunked.

******

WaPo asks in June why an assassinate attempt on Trump wasn't a bigger story.

It's November and we're still wondering why. The prog jerks atTwitter doesn't seem to care.

******

John Culhane has sound advice for parents.

Don't turn them into productive citizens with integrity and sound mind. Nope. Turn them into agitators. Outstanding.

In case you were wondering, I will do no such thing. Because, you know, we're responsible adults.

******

Someone should ask the folks at NPR about their opinions regarding all the #assassinateTrump and Kill Trump memes and hashtags littering the internet.

Cool or not cool?

Once they settle down from their spinning maybe they can ponder the question.

******

Check this headline out in an article by Meagan Fitzpatrick at the, where else?, CBC:

"Lame duck President Obama faces 'hostile takeover' of White House"

By a man elected legally by the people?

******

Fifa. Still incorrigible.

*****

Merkel's Germany. Crazy naive now and crazy naive then.

******

What was one response by the EU after the Brexit vote? Launch a crackdown on kettles and toasters.

Totally gonna make them regret their decision.

******

Never had the time to work out my thoughts on Brexit. Quickly, one like Trump (and I really do regret not posting articles I wrote about how the alternative media had him winning) they didn't see it coming. And like Trump Brexit voters were deemed xenophobic and the reaction were just as hysterical. Guess what? The world didn't end. Two, the theory of the EU is one thing, but in practice it's become a gigantic technocratic mess and superficially democratic.

More here  here and here.

******

Two things I've learned. Don't try and silence people and don't mock them.

Or else you're in for a rude awakening.

Don't be a smart-alec.

******

Gender equality now!

File under 'People are fed up with and why Trump was elected.'

I have no problem with this. It's just that, you know, they wouldn't tolerate an all-male gym citing discrimination and all that.

******

Because you can't talk about this enough. Hillary's emails.

******

Nobel Laureates to Greenpeace: Stop killing children.

"The United Nations Food & Agriculture Program has noted that global production of food, feed and fiber will need approximately to double by 2050 to meet the demands of a growing global population. Organizations opposed to modern plant breeding, with Greenpeace at their lead, have repeatedly denied these facts and opposed biotechnological innovations in agriculture. They have misrepresented their risks, benefits, and impacts, and supported the criminal destruction of approved field trials and research projects.

We urge Greenpeace and its supporters to re-examine the experience of farmers and consumers worldwide with crops and foods improved through biotechnology, recognize the findings of authoritative scientific bodies and regulatory agencies, and abandon their campaign against "GMOs" in general and Golden Rice in particular."


******

Whatever happened to 'Attack Watch'?

Right. Nothing ever really happened and smears are just part of the game.

'Member? I 'member.

******

Believe it or not this happened BEFORE TRUMP!:

The executive director of a San Diego faith-based nonprofit said he was threatened by the San Diego Police Department that "the hammer would be brought down" on him if he didn't stop doing street feedings for the homeless in July, when the Major League Baseball All-Star Game is coming to downtown.

******

Enforcing the law is inherently violent.

Duh.

******

When prosecutors with hold evidence and send innocent people to jail.

******

Will VW survive?

Call me nuts but all this for a lousy emissions infraction?

If I'm VW I hang on until Trump takes over and appeal to business acumen and not politics.

More here.

******

Non-sequitur. If only Jon Stewart was still on TV. Hillary would be President!

******

Another day, another climate change fraud story.

******

Why Obama says ISIL.

******

Another day, another SJW hoax. This time a conviction!

******

Mark Steyn knows:

"By the way, a guest host of this program, Mark Steyn, was on Greta last night. Did you hear what he said? This is great. Steyn said, quote (paraphrasing), "To most Americans, Donald Trump sounds a lot less nutty than John Kerry did when he said in Paris that Islam's not the problem, while they're still mopping blood up from the streets in Paris." Bingo.
That's not unconnected to his victory a year later. The so-called nuts are saner - or, at any rate, less reckless and imprudent - than all the respectable types whose fatuous illusions get you killed for going to a restaurant or rock concert."

******

Keep my country hyper-secular! No GOD!

******

More stuff you won't see in the mainstream press:

"There are now more non-military government employees who carry guns than there are U.S. Marines, according to a new report.
Open the Books, a taxpayer watchdog group, released a study Wednesday that finds domestic government agencies continue to grow their stockpiles of military-style weapons, as Democrats sat on the House floor calling for more restrictions on what guns American citizens can buy."
More bureaucrats have guns than Marines, huh.

Something, something, disturbance in the narrative.

******

What's a Green Job? Ask Green Jobs Answer Man:



******

Where the EU technocratic whores can stunt growth by imposing a massive regulatory and bureaucratic super-structure, they will do it.

A new proposal from the European Parliament calls for working robots to be classified as "electronic persons," and for their owners to pay social security on their behalf. The draft motion, published online this month, aims to address the new challenges that Europe's robotic workforce will present as robot technology becomes more pervasive and intelligent. The proposal says growing automation will require new frameworks for taxation and legal liability, but as Reuters reports, it faces opposition from some robotics companies.
The rise in automation and artificial intelligence has raised concerns in Europe and elsewhere over economic effects, including unemployment, inequality, and social security systems. 
VDMA, a German industry group that represents major robot manufacturers, says it's too early to create such a legal framework for robots, adding that it could hinder innovation. Patrick Schwarzkopf, VDMA's managing director for robotics, told reporters at a Munich trade show that a framework could arise "in 50 years, but not in 10 years."
"We think it would be very bureaucratic and would stunt the development of robotics," Schwarzkopf added."
******

LBGT gun rights group saw membership skyrocket after Orlando shootings.

******

Gun control: Overall, no correlation between it and murder rates.


******

Origin of Yankee Doodle.

******

On science:

"This is the first time that I look at a device that was approved by the FDA and I am absolutely, utterly, and totally appalled that it was approved," says Joseph Gutman, an endocrinologist and diabetologist in Pembroke Pines, Florida, who has treated patients with obesity for over 30 years. Gutman says he’s put together a group of 750 physicians who want to sue the FDA to take the device off the market; his ultimate goal is to get 4,000 doctors to join him. "It is the most pathetic exhibition of ignorance on the part of our agency, the FDA. It is nothing but a bad trick. It’s like a bad joke."

******



There is no panacea and think for yourself

******

Wait. What? You thought the VA was gonna fix itself after Obama's stern words? You poor, poor sucker.

******

Burrrrn!

******

Motherjones:

"In 2011, the State Department cleared an enormous arms deal: Led by Boeing, a consortium of American defense contractors would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, despite concerns over the kingdom's troublesome human rights record. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, Saudi Arabia had contributed $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, and just two months before the jet deal was finalized, Boeing donated $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to an International Business Timesinvestigation released Tuesday."

Tell us something we didn't know.

******

Alien contact 1500 years away according to Cornell astronomers.

******

Never really had a problem with McDonald's even though I rarely eat there. I do enjoy a McDonald's breakfast from time to time particularly on vacation.

McDonald's kicks ass though. Especially since it's public enemy #1 with busybodies.

******

The trial, which is the first in the world to show complete long-term remission from the debilitating disease has been hailed by experts as ‘exciting’ ‘unprecedented,’ and ‘close to curative.’"

******

Google manipulated searched that favoured Hillary.

What difference does it make at this point?

******

Such deep, inner strength.

"What I said just now [about Trump's 'retardation'], I would never say these things about anybody," the guru confessed. "It's not like me. But he's bringing out the worst in me, because I, too, am fearful of what would happen to the United States of America and the rest of the world if, God forbid, he became president."


Well, Deepak. He is now. How's the pant shitting going?

******

Before Trump, they were just nuts. After Trump they're just unhinged. Here's what the before looked like:

“We are a post-genocidal society. On this continent there were native people, indigenous people, Native Americans, and they were slaughtered by the millions … by white settlers,” Stevenson, a professor at the New York University School of Law, told the grads. “I don’t think that slavery ended in 1865, I think it just evolved. It turned into decades when you had lynchings and violence and terrorism, and people of color fled from the American south to communities all over this country.”
Really? Attack people...at a commencement speech?

No class Bryan Stevenson. Rather insufferable actually.

Hey, Bryan you boob. Look up Irish indentured servants and get back to me, 'kay?

Until then, go be myopic in your cabin.

******

Burn the bitch down! And Broken Windows Fallacy.

******

Auditor General has serious concerns on how Montreal is run. 

File under 'No shit'.

And something tells me it ain't better under Coderre. He has no principles.

Coderre looks like the guy who when presented with a platter of doughnuts wiggles his fingers and says, 'don't mind if I do!'

******




******

What? You expect the liberal media to be fair and accurate with Trump?

Are you nuts? They're going to double down and 'learn dem hicks!'

******

Le Quebec me tue.

I'm not following.

The want to cut annual physical exams for healthy patients (which is a preventative measure in of itself) but will spend $76 million over 10 years to:

"...The Couillard government will invest...for projects that look to improve overall health and quality of life.
Some of the areas that could see funding is projects for expanding affordable housing, curbing smoking and increasing home-based care services for seniors."
******
More on Hillary's emails at C-PAN.

******

Man of the year:

As Venezuela burns, he shows his support with a Chavez t-shirt, hat, and a glass of Bordeaux with his Midtown lunch

******

The government shake down of VW gets real world consequences as the company prepares to pay the  shysters. Price? 30 000 jobs.

Think of that the next time your hear some parasitical politician squawk on about 'protecting jobs'. The only jobs they care about are the ones that get them votes and the odd kickback.

The amount of the fine is absurd. The government has the power to knock out a world brand like VW and deprive people of its products...all because of some environmental rule it broke. Fine them and move on.

******

Catastrophe averted. I don't know why people think things would have been better under commie-pinko-socialist Bernie Sanders. Heck, I happen to think it would have been worse. Nothing good comes out of envious left-wing economic stupidity.

******

Success!

"Wendy's (WEN) said that self-service ordering kiosks will be made available across its 6,000-plus restaurants in the second half of the year as minimum wage hikes and a tight labor market push up wages.
It will be up to franchisees whether to deploy the labor-saving technology, but Wendy's President Todd Penegor did note that some franchise locations have been raising prices to offset wage hikes."
Progressive mind-non-think: How dare they mess up our plans by trying to offset the costs!

******

33 facts about slavery. Probably good for that idiot up top who ruined a commencement speech at the University of Delaware:



******

I thought money was bad in politics. Hillary raised more money than anyone.

******

How progressives like to run stuff like the economy:




******

When NASA sticks to space, they do good stuff. When they do climate change in hopes of getting funding, not so much.

******

/whistling and walking hand in my pocket deep in free-form thought.

No one should really be surprised by what's happening on college and university campuses on the continent. While there are several reasons and theories worth exploring as to why (and too long for our purposes here), one is the practice of affirmative action. Affirmative action, in a nutshell, allows people to go to university who are unprepared but are admitted on racial considerations. This, in my view, is still a form of racism (or at least unjust to the student who deserves the spot) as it reinforces needly negative stereotypes (and even destructive to the point of a student realizing they in fact do not belong in such an environment) and serves no one. Not the school, not 'society' and certainly not the student.

A student who is academically inferior comes in with, as part of that weakness, generally an uncritical mind. Perhaps a lack of intellectual curiosity likely to react aggressively if not violently to opinions that challenge their world view. They come in with a pre-determined perception of the world (based on their experiences and confirmed by a network of friends and academia* and little else) and come armed to defend it. Not accept the possibility it possesses errors or could be wrong. It's 'fight the power' for school. They don't see school as a place to evolve and grow but a place to impose their will upon it. The idea of working in the spirit of intellectual freedom and cooperation is alien - nay! - rejected by this student.

Given they're already weak in critical thought (have a look-see), they're open to all sorts of propaganda and as such at the mercy of academics with an agenda. Where Pinketty becomes the authority of all things economic, Friedman becomes a pariah and there's no in-between. No wiggle room for debate. In fact, as we've seen, they've come up with a neat method of not confronting people who challenge their views. They either call for censorship or they simply assert those who oppose them are 'racist'. How dare they challenge their anecdotal personal experiences in an institution of higher learning?

More like lower learning now.

It's all pretty bloody obvious.

*People like Elizabeth Warren for example. Leftists like Warren don't seek truth. They look for narratives to exploit. She'll rail against 'rigged systems' and whisper into their ears they're being robbed and mistreated further deepening their already cynical and unproductive stances. And then she quietly tip toes backwards like a Scooby-Doo villain out of the room to observe her machinations from afar. She's a sower of discontent by design because she has the remedy already set up in a working paper she'd like to present to further her ambitions and for political gains.

******

Possible oldest dentures in Europe found in Lucca, Italy. Some fine dentistry work. No seriously.

*******

Countries with most millionaires leaving. China and India are at the top while France and Italy lead in Europe.

*******

The Federal government has no business mandating schools on transgender bathrooms. It's gross over reach and find it appalling parents weren't asked about this first. The argument they should refuse funding for opposing this is weak. That a state entity receives Federal money shouldn't mean it's a slave to it. Let local schools and their communities determine if this is needed.

This is right up Trudeau's Liberals alley.

As a father of a daughter, I wouldn't like it one bit.

I like this quote from the comments:

"Inside every progressive, including Obama, is a decaying moral anarchist who cannot fathom the importance of morality to civilization."

******

Here's how the provinces and Canada perform economically according to the Conference Board of Canada. Quebec scores a 'C'. Never seen Quebec as a leader in too many things. 

******

What happened at Burlington College under the watch of the Sanders?

It's what you'd expect from a couple of socialist parasites.

The school sank but they came out swimmingly well.

*******

Just get a room with the Trudeau's already MacDonald.

You certainly have abandoned your objective journalism at this point.

On my dime no less.

Privatize the CBC.

******

Lest we forget the wise words of the Obama: I won. Get over it.



******

Modern Goth:
"A RUSSIAN man who has a debilitating illness has volunteered to become the first person to undergo a head transplant – but experts say the side effectsof the procedure could be worse than death.
Valery Spiridonov, 30, suffers from Werdnig-Hoffmann disease, a rare form of
spinal muscular atrophy."
The experimental transplant, due to be carried out in 2017 by Italian surgeon
"...Dr Sergio Canavero, is likely to take 36-hours and will involve over 150
doctors and nurses...."
******
Six mass extinctions at Lapham's Quarterly.

******

Uber is innovation. Taxi is stagnation.

We were gonna do the same thing! We swear!

******

If they won't play ball, seize it.

Yes, this is a sparking idea. Use eminent domain to shut down coal mines and pay the workers.

Academic law professors crack me up.

******

Yet, their solution is to tear down what's been built so as to give others perceived to be at a disadvantage a 'chance.'

In other words, lower the standards.

Hackman believes grades and showing up on time are examples of 'white supremacy'. In case you thought she made any sense.

SJW is a plague.

******

I like refreshing and honest takes on things. And because I appreciate it I post them.



2016-11-17

Articles And Studies To Blow The Narrative Away

Do White Police Officers Unfairly Target Black Suspects?

By Lott and Moody.

"Using a unique data set we link the race of police officers who kill suspects with the race of those who are killed across the United States. We have data on a total of 2,699 fatal police killings for the years 2013 to 2015. This is 1,333 more killings by police than is provided by the FBI data on justifiable police homicides. When either the violent crime rate or the demographics of a city are accounted for, we find that white police officers are not significantly more likely to kill a black suspect. For the estimates where we know the race of the officer who killed the suspect, the ratio of the rate that blacks are killed by black versus white officers is large — ranging from 3 to 5 times larger. However, because the media may under report the officer’s race when black offic-ers are involved, other results that account for the fact that a disproportionate number of the un-known race officers may be more reliable. They indicate no statistically significant difference be-tween killings of black suspects by black and white officers. Our panel data analysis that looks at killings at the police department level confirms this. These findings are inconsistent with taste-based racial discrimination against blacks by white police officers. Our estimates examining the killings of white and Hispanic suspects found no differences with respect to the races of police officers. If the police are engaged in discrimination, such discriminatory behavior should also be more difficult when body or other cameras are recording their actions. We find no evidence that body cameras affect either the number of police killings or the racial composition of those killings."

***

This is a really good piece debunking and obliterating all the hysteria around Trump at Slate Star Codex by Scott Alexander.

I mean really good.

It's long so get your favourite beverage and snack if necessary.

I also point to this politifact factcheck linked in the article. It's a tiny thing I zero in on given the immense content presented but I just wanted to take a second to show how even politifact plays with the facts.

***

Another from RealClearPolitics. 

As the the unhinged slowly recede into their myopic and ignorant bins, thoughtful writing by intelligent minds enter the realm of discourse.

***

"...In the 1980s & 1990s Trump donated heavily to charities that focused on the AIDS outbreak. When he floated a third party presidential run in 1999 he went on record saying he would consider adding sexual orientation to the Civil Rights Act. Trump is also believed to be the first private club owner in Palm Beach — in this case Mar-a-Lago — to admit a gay couple. This is not the resume of an LGBT foe."

Yup. Quite the monster.

About Trump's Loan: You're Not That Smart

People are making a stink of Trump getting a $500 000 loan from his father as if this somehow is a negative mark against him and that somehow it shows hypocrisy given how he acts and talks about his successes.

Aside from the fact it's no one's business what families do with their money, mocking it is misguided. Built into this whine is the assumption that people think if they were lucky enough (unfair!) to get such a loan (or other people's money as they put it) they'd be rich too.

Hate to break it to you but that's not true for most of you.

Not everyone can be a successful entrepreneur. To be in business it takes a certain mindset and drive. The fact is most people would likely squander the money too. It's kinds a law of human nature. The temptation to buy a TV or spend it on stuff is greater than drawing up a business plan or an idea you want to take to market. Or, in the case of Trump, examine real estate.

Another part of the equation is the necessity to take risks. And when you take risk, you stand to lose money no matter how well thought out the plan is.

The vast  majority of people (the ones who won't spend it) are risk averse and a more likely to place the loan in a safe investment.

Think of it this way. If your mother or father gave you a single AA battery and gave you, say $10 000. Could you turn that into a million dollar operation?

Don't piss on people's successes or advantages on what you perceive to be an advantage. You don't know what it took to turn that money into wealth. To think you do is a toxic mix of arrogance, ignorance and envy.


2016-11-16

Trump Hysteria Same As Brexit

As I've noted, and many of sound mind have observed, there are similarities between the reaction to the Brexit and Trump votes. In both cases the winner was depicted of having no chance and when they prevailed mass hysteria followed.

"Has there ever been a crime panic as flimsy, as see-through, as explicitly designed to make political mileage as the post-Brexit hate-crime hysteria? Too many people are nodding along to this nonsense, accepting as hard fact every doom-tinged utterance from the police and evidence-lite statement from the Home Office. They repeat and tweet every claim from officialdom about ‘soaring hatred’ since the 23 June referendum, and hold it up as proof that the vote to leave the EU unleashed the latent xenophobia and even homophobia of Them: those sections of society that are Eurosceptical and therefore evil. Enough. This is a moral panic, plain and simple: a naked example of the kind of ‘crime construction’ by the powers-that-be that liberals and leftists might once have critiqued, back when they were more questioning.
The hate-crime hysteria doesn’t stand up to even the mildest scrutiny. This week, the gay-rights group Galop caused global waves when it claimed homophobic hate crime rose by 147 per cent in the three months after the referendum, due to the ‘toxicity fostered by the EU referendum debate’. How does that work, then? There was no anti-gay sentiment in the Leave campaign. None of the arguments for leaving the EU was related to homosexuality. Yet we’re expected to believe that, somehow, a discussion about the future of a Brussels-based institution led to people thinking: ‘Bloody gays. Let’s get them.’ Who’s buying this?"
Read rest at Spiked Online.
Who's buying this? I think we know.

The Unhinged: The Great Safety Pin Revolt And The New Narrative

This is getting, erm, really troubling.

A friend was telling me about a campaign where will wear a safety pin as a symbol of support to those who are threatened by Elmer Fudd.

Kidding. Donald Trump. Who else?

Yeah, that's the ticket. Wearing a safety pin for a non-existent threat rooted in nothing but irrational fear and even animism.

These idiots strongly suggest we teach our children. Damn straight I will. And it's going to be the complete opposite of whatever The Unhinged say.

The FB page claims there have been 26 incidences of violence by Trump supporters. From what he tells me, and I can't confirm the articles and have to go on his word, half are pretty much stupid things  kids do while the other half are likely false flags or jumping to conclusions variety.

However, we DO have plenty of violence by Hillary supporters as I've been sloppily culling over the last few days.

Here's another.

And another.

Sigh...

And another.

But that didn't stop NPR from pumping up and putting fear into people's mind about the alleged rise of 'white nationalism.'

Wouldn't surprise me if someone taking issue with being called a racist qualifies as a 'white nationalist' if I understand and read the progressive mind set correctly.

They did almost have one with the story of the student who tackled anti-Trump protestor in Ohio.

We got it!

Except...

"Since last night, it has become clear that my assault was not politically motivated in the way that we previously thought, nor was it committed by a Trump supporter," Adams wrote Tuesday morning on his public Facebook page, according to the school newspaper, the Lantern. "At this time I am working to drop the charges against the person in question."

And apparently a registered Democrat.

Soooo close.

Other than that, the progressive interpretation of what constitutes civility seems to come down to something along the lines of: Peace, love, understanding...get him! 

Where 'getting him' is justified because they hold the moral high ground.


2016-11-15

A President Who Could Not Lead

This article was written in First Things soon after the massacre in Orlando (may the victims RIP).

It's one in which I can but agree with and share.

Obama consistently missed the mark. He could not connect to a people.

"His subsequent remarks on Tuesday were far more jarring. Facing criticism for not acknowledging the reality of “radical Islam”—something that even Hillary Clinton has now done—the President launched into a tirade against his critics, laying bare his partisan inability to rise to the occasion. Angry, bitter, self-serving, Obama succeeded in doing something many thought him incapable of: acting like Donald Trump.


Obama was at pains to stress how committed his administration is to fighting terrorism: “We are doing everything in our power to stop these kind of attacks.” But if that is true, how is it possible that the FBI had monitored the Orlando gunman, Omar Mateen, for years, only to abandon its surveillance of him, clearing the way for his attack? And why, in a country and under an administration that sanctions the slogan, “If you see something, say something,” were the warnings of a co-worker about Mateen’s fanatical views ignored?
Obama continued: “Our mission is to destroy ISIL. . . . We are making significant progress. . . . ISIL is under more pressure than ever before. ISIL continues to lose key leaders. . . . ISIL’s ranks are shrinking. . . . Their morale is sinking.” But just two days after the President made these remarks, his own head of the CIA, John Brennan, testifying before Congress, provided a far grimmer assessment: “[O]ur efforts have not reduced [ISIL]’s terrorism capability and global reach. . . .We judge that it will intensify its global terror campaign to maintain its dominance of the global terrorism agenda.” Not only that, said Brennan, but ISIL has a “large cadre of Western fighters” ready to launch new attacks like the one in Orlando, and continues to attract new and enthusiastic recruits."
"...But what is most disappointing about President Obama’s attitude toward radical Islamic terrorism, and his critics, is his consistent refusal to admit his mistakes and accept responsibility for his administration’s actions. As the historian Niall Ferguson recently commented, a much-discussed profile of Obama in the Atlantic “reveals a President in denial about the consequences of his own sins of omission and commission. Everyone is to blame—everyone but him.”
As I took to calling him early in his term: The 'I didn't do it' President.
When considering his eight years in office, you can't gloss over these things. When you soberly assess the totality of his remarks and actions, you find a President who was less a leader and more an activist lecturer. No wonder he couldn't connect to the people despite his two mandates.

It always bothered me - spiritually and intellectually - to listen to the left push for gun control soon after a massacre as if it would have prevented it.

Luckily, we may not have to hear this logical fallacy for at least 4 years now. Hopefully.

But it's a mindset that leads to corrosive ideas as the detestable Diane Feinstein displays here with her 'prove your innocence' line of logic.

Hey Pant Shitters: Huggies Are Running Out Of Diapers!

"The Defcon Warning System, a private organisation which monitors world events and estimates the nuclear threat against America, is now at Level 5 - its lowest possible state.
Just weeks ago the warning was accelerated to Level 3 following increased tensions between US and Russia, with insiders fearing the West was creeping closer to nuclear war.
Level 3 means US troops could be mobilised in as little as 15 minutes."

The Great Unhinged: This Is Getting Very Serious

It has been quite amusing and entertaining watching people absolutely make total asses of themselves since November 8.

These idiots talk about the fucken children but break just about every rule of common decency, respect and other values we teach our kids thanks to their irrational and unhinged faux self-righteous rage.

Get a grip and grow up.

In the process, they've also in plain view revealed they don't have any principles. They're just over reacting in defending their principal who lacked a disturbing amount of principles herself.

Man, the head is spinning.

Of course, being the authoritarian, anti-intellectual reactionaries that they really are led by a bunch of derelict politicians - like Barbara Boxer and another poser hypocrite far left-wing liar Elizabeth Warren (I'm not holding my punches, eh?)- who should be shown the door, they now want to abolish the electoral college. This is not about serving America. It's rooted in cynical, shameless idiocy.

One question: What happens when their leader loses the popular vote? What makes them so sure they will win every time despite recent history? Never mind America is a constitutional republic of united states.

But tradition and history means shit to ignorant mind.


If the election were based on total popular vote I would have campaigned in N.Y. Florida and California and won even bigger and more easily

***

Communist comrade Chomsky is at it again. 

Nothing Trump does will please the far left but putting a climate skeptic in charge of the EPA is awesome and a cool piece of trolling.

***

I mention this crazy story from the University of Virginia because it shows just how deep the virus of progressivism threatens American history.

On slavery, I bet you these nitwits (the staff should be fired by the way) never read a single thing about the history of slavery. They may want to learn Islamic slavery for starters and start to contextualize history rather than let their depraved emotional state drive it.

Why did these assholes freely choose to go to UofV? The university better defend the integrity of its institution at all costs.

DO NOT let the forces of ignorance and SJW prevail.

This is how they do it. Slowly erase the quotes, books etc. And then they go after The Constitution, Politically, they do it by changing the public narrative to go after the parts of TC they don't like. 'Who needs guns?' 'Common sense gun control'. 'You need to balance free speech.' 


***

Remember Facebook was going to be the saviour of all things civil and good?

They're refusing to remove an 'Assassinate Trump' page.

I truly hope and pray Facebook collapses. Rotten to its core.

Proud to not be on that wretched site run by obviously bias and partisan boneheads.

Yes, it's Infowars but know what? At least Alex Jones covers it.

***

Right about now we need some humour:



***

Back to the insanity:

Journalist calls for assassination of Trump.

CEO does the same.

This is in addition to celebrities like DeNiro (who the police really should visit just to make sure he's alright) talking tough about taking baseball bats to Trump's body. Robert, you played Jimmy Conway, you're not Jimmy Conway tufgui. Ma che vergogna verramente.

Aaaaand.

Last but not least:

"...Zachary Benson, a 24-year-old from the Cleveland suburbs, got an unwanted visit from federal agents inquiring about his tweeted threat to kill President-elect Donald Trump shortly after the New Yorker was declared the winner a week ago.
"My life goal is to assassinate Trump. Don't care if I serve infinite sentences," The Daily Mail quoted Benson as tweeting. "That man deserves to decease (sic) existing." Seconds earlier he tweeted: "Diplomacy. F***ing fools. I hate you all. I want to bomb every one of your voting booths and your general areas."
Remember folks. It's Trump supporters who are violent. If anything, all we're seeing is they're sane, decent and rational in comparison.

And I sure as hell don't recall this happening under Obama - and I was looking for it. Given how the media was totally backing him up, you'd think they'd report on it. So with this unscientific metric, I'm guessing it's worse now.

More to come. This is just too serious to ignore.


Google Tracking A Dubious Line

I read an article (sorry hidden behind a paywall but you can search it) Google wants to crack down on 'fake news'.

Right off the bat this should make anyone nervous. What exactly would qualify as 'fake news'?

CNN is a manufacturer of lies but I doubt they'll be touched, right?

Facebook and Google (two supporters of the Democrat party) are now positioning themselves as 'arbiters' of news.

It wouldn't surprise me what qualifies as 'fake' is actually stuff that goes against the progressive narrative. Worse, if it does support the narrative even if found to not be factually "accurate" but is true in their conceptualization of what constitutes the 'big picture' and what they consider to be in a 'deeper sense' then it will be allowed.

'Yeah, yeah the models are off but think of the importance of saving the planet!' I remember when the PQ lost the referendum in 1995, then leader Jacques Parizeau (a slobby feller) blamed it on the 'money and ethnic' vote in a drunken moment of stupid xenophobia. My neighbour, a separatist, the next day rationalized it thusly: It's true but you can't say that!

I'll let you decipher that gibberish.

To be perfectly honest, I wouldn't be surprised if they shut me down one day. Every morning I log in paranoid thinking I'll see 11 years worth of posts...gone. 

Anyway.

Forgive me if I don't like the sound of this. Right off the bat this should concern all citizens about the real possibility of censorship on the simple grounds of not agreeing with the narrative set by Democrats and the left.

The timing of this is also interesting. Hillary lost ergo it must be because people were fooled. Not because she was a shitty candidate. No way. According to their algorithms they're too smart to believe that.

Of course, it's possible all the 'fake news' actually helped Hillary more than Trump. We saw the collusion in the media play out and Google and Facebook seem all too willing to play the game and join the ranks of conspiring against people.

How else to view this?

UPDATE:

Well that didn't take long now did it? And it's unfolding exactly the way we thought.

According to Reason:

"In a way, describing Assistant Professor Melissa Zimdars' list of online outlets to be wary of as a list of "fake news" sites is itself a little misleading. But that is how the non-fake news outlets are describing her work. Zimdars, a communications professor at Merrimaack College in Massachusetts, put together a list of what she calls "False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical 'News' Sources.'"
Only two of those modifiers suggest actual faked news—"false" and "satirical." The other two words are judgment calls that we make ourselves as readers. Nevertheless, reporting is describing Zimdars' work as a list of "fake news" sites. And there are now web browser extensions that create pop-ups to warn visitors when they're looking at stories from one of these sites. This one by Brian and Feldman at New York Magazine uses Zimdars' list as a foundation.
But Zimdars' list is awful. It includes not just fake or parody sites; it includes sites with heavily ideological slants like Breitbart, LewRockwell.com, Liberty Unyielding, and Red State. These are not "fake news" sites. They are blogs that—much like Reason—have a mix of opinion and news content designed to advance a particular point of view. Red Statehas linked to pieces from Reason on multiple occasions, and years ago I wrote a guest commentary for Breitbart attempting to make a conservative case to support gay marriage recognition."
I'm starting to believe progressivism is on its death bed.

2016-11-14

For Idiot Celebrities: Route To Canada



I shouldn't encourage this because we don't need these clowns.

Violent Progressives; De Niro's Broken Moral Compass




Here's the latest round of progressives doing what they do. Lie about violence against them but display actual calls for violence against others.

Since Trump's stunning Election Day victory last week, social media hashtags like #AssassinateTrump and #Killtrump have proliferated. Over the weekend, a protester near Trump Tower held aloft a sign calling for future first lady Melania Trump to be violated, echoing a trending hashtag #RapeMelania.
Those who support Trump took to Twitter as well, mostly to voice anger over the social media platform's perceived hypocrisy. They noted hashtag #HillaryForPrison was blocked during the campaign, while #AssassinateTrump was not.
Sick people and sick in the head.

Will the assholes at Twitter who banned Milo ban these pieces of shits?

***

Here's a video of a student beaten up by classmates for having voted for Trump in a mock election.

Another here.

Never mind the vandalism committed by the idiot protestors - supported by clowns like De Niro. Who threatened to beat Trump with a baseball bat. How he wasn't investigated by police I don't know.

He also said the Trump election was like how he felt on 9/11. What a despicable thing to say. He just cynically took the deaths of 3000 Americans to score a cheap political point.

I have no idea why actors get so much respect like they do. De Niro is an anti-vaccine nut yet he gets invitations like this.

 What I love are the comments. All wrecking him.

Bravo De Niro. Ma va cacarere!

Keep it going progs and watch America turn further red.

***

In other news, I blew CNN out of my TV package and switched it to Fox.


The Great Unhinged Continues: Wanda Sykes And John Oliver





They don't even bother to respect their craft anymore. What was comedic in this stupid screed? And to attack PAYING CUSTOMERS?

I was just thinking about this today.

When I see this sort of stuff it drives me crazy. Mostly because it's vapid and arrogant. It disrespects not only people who may disagree but people endowed with a far more powerful mind and wisdom.

When will people like this dolt understand they don't hold the key to any universal truth? And if you're going to incorporate this sort of stuff into your act you may want to, you know, BE FUNNY.

I've grown tired of the lectures. You can't go anywhere without some unread, middling asswipe celebrity spew their emotional gibberish onto you. It's to the point I don't pay to go see concerts anymore. Why should I pay whatever it is they charge to be scolded and lectured by people who, in the end, live in a fucken artistic bubble? I don't consider them to possess any universal wisdom that eludes people. Same with companies like Starbucks who flaunt their politics. What do you think a guy like me will do? Fuck. You.

And this is the fundamental problem with progressivism. It simply presumes others are stupid.

***

When will they get it?

Another smart-alec progressive  is John Oliver.

"Our future president was supported by a Grand Wizard of the Klan and 60 million people voted for him despite that."

Soooo, 60 million people (34 million of whom voted for Obama) suddenly went full cult for an organization with no teeth, popularity or power mostly existing on the fringes of American social life?

Another example of an asshole thinking he can fool people with his logical fallacy.

As for Trump, Oliver probably knows his family is Orthodox Jewish
John Oliver is the sort of asshole who would lineup first to try and get Rimmler's attention.

Meanwhile, Clinton spoke glowingly of raging racist Robert Byrd at his funeral. Tireless public servant my ass.
Nothing to see here because...The Great Unhinged Continue to poison minds.

Waiting For CNN To Disappear

More evidence of CNN a mere propaganda arm of the DNC. NONE of their employees are journalists. Notice Don Lemmon cutting off a person for merely telling the damn truth about Bill Clinton. What piece of shit. This is a network that deserves to disappear.

They're traitors of the American people. They side with a political party and will never defend the interest of citizens.

My mother. My fricken 75 year-old mother who did nothing but watch CNN has switched to Fox she is so thoroughly disgusted with them. She feels shame for having listened to them. Yes, I did try telling her to not watch those idiots. But I did tell her Fox is a better option for the simple fact A) they admit they're conservative and B) are more honourable and won't cut people off like this.

If she did this I can only guess and hope many more are coming to the same conclusions and decisions.

I don't know how anyone an watch that drivel and pablum.

2016-11-13

The Media Won't Change

Now be careful. The media is not going to change or man up. They're going to continue serving their masters. Be extremely diligent. They will do everything in the their power to scare the population about Trump no matter what he does. He can act EXACTLY like Obama (which is not a good thing) and they will still attack and pounce.

This is a predictable game.

Be prepared.


Norm MacDonald Lampooning The Clintons On SNL

The Clintons never fooled Norm.



You know, after watching this I realized what pure political satire humour is supposed to be. Norm and Dennis Miller were simply the best at it. They completely blow those posers and shills for Democrats Jon Stewart and John Oliver out of the water. It's not even a contest. They had balls. Plus they're far less smug and irreverent.

'Here's President Clinton and the First Bitch.'

'The president's a murderer. You didn't know that?'

Guy is a fucken legend. 


FIRE EVERYONE AT SNL AND MAKE IT A ONE MAN SHOW STARRING NORM.

The Unhinged

Check this out. I couldn't stop giggling sipping camomile. Drops mic.

Progressive Left Media: Liars

Projection much?

Here's your typical left-wing lies from The Week that mislead the people:

There isn't a shred of evidence this would happen. But once again, we're seeing 'peaceful progressive protestors' not exactly behaving themselves.

In the run up to the election, it was progressives and Hillary supporters vandalizing property, provoking people at Trump rallies and causing all-around trouble. 

We have evidence of it left, right and centre. Wikileaks released emails that prove this was a tactic from the DNC. We had people brazenly express they were doing so in places like The Washington Post in an abdication of journalistic integrity. They justified their criminal acts as self-righteous. 

Remember the lies about Tea Party people allegedly being racist and violence? Never happened. Like the polls, people were covering this and showing the exact opposite was happening. Meanwhile, OSW came with unrest and police provocation.

OSW protestors were arrested and there a public records showing this. There is precious little if any on the Tea Party side.

Yes. What I am saying is all the civility was one side. And it ain't the full of shit progressive left.

Call them out when they do it.

Liars.

***

Mother Jones and The Daily Beast do good work. Heck, they even have integrity. They don't need to go this route.



The Media-Politics-Citizen Relationship; Comments Matter

It's a few times I've heard people begrudge comments on articles around the Internet. I'm not so down on them personally.

It's a form of participatory democracy where people have a chance to voice their opinion. I like to believe on the aggregate this has some weight on the scale of things in the decision making process.

I mentioned this before but I sometimes go straight to the comments section before reading an article.  One thing I've observed for a while now is the disconnect between the views of people in the comments section and the writer.

I don't blame people for thinking journalists to write in a 'I just consulted our betters and here's what we decided you must believe' manner.

People get to voice their opinion and can even be seen as form of keeping a check on our 'masters'. It's democracy in full motion where every possible differing view is expressed.

This is why I abhor censorship of any kind.

Saturday Night Live: Jumps The Shark

SNL is the latest show to let its mask slip and send a middle finger to its audience.

I have no idea what makes them think it's such a good idea. I haven't watched in years and clearly I'm not missing much just like I'm not missing anything bypassing talk shows.

In fact, it keeps my mind healthy and clean free from all the propaganda.

This is not humour or comedy. It's political advocacy masking as comedy.

I'm funnier than SNL all by myself.

I don't know what's more lame and infuriating.

Political advocacy passing off as comedy or ignorant liberals passing off as intellects.


Gregg Popovich's Comments Breakdown

This is getting tiring. Taking on the world.

Gregg Popovich - 'Pop' - weighed in on Trump. If you follow sports, you know Greg Popovich is one of the more interesting characters in basketball if not pro sports in North America. 

I read his comment and don't consider it to be insufferable but it is highly selective and falls under the  'you're not considering the alternative enough because you're obsessed with one side' file. I feel somewhat uncomfortable doing so with a man who served his country (and as coach of a team and organization I've come to respect as a sports fan) so I can but focus on the intellectual side of his argument.

Let's break it down:

"...but the disgusting tenor and tone and all of the comments that have been xenophobic, homophobic, racist, misogynistic.

"I live in that country where half of the people ignored all of that to elect someone. That's the scariest part of the whole thing to me."


          Seems innocuous enough but there's a lot one can take issue with. First, let's tackle the issue of how we've come to throw words around flippantly that seems to have accelerated during the Obama administration. What's 'scary' is how low the standard to which someone qualifies as 'racist' or 'misogynistic' has become. When you soberly examine Trump's words I don't think they rise to being misogynistic in the classic sense as we've come to understand the word. If so, then and this is where Pop sets himself up to charges of hypocrisy, millions of people are guilty of this including above all athletes. He can't sit there and lecture people while pretending 'locker room' gutter talk doesn't exist. It flies of the face of reality and shared experiences. It certainly challenges the fact the NBA has had its own major issues with violence, spousal and drug abuse through the years. 


Words matter but if the most you've got is 'grab her pussy' (I'm guilty of this vulgar talk myself) then, really, in its most profound and logical sense where political argument is concerned, you got nothing.

Nothing.
The Democrat party itself has had a history of 'misogynistic' politicians including the serial sexual assaulter Bill Clinton. Did Pop ever voice displeasure then in defence of women? Why? Has there really been a proliferation of misogyny? No. This is all a narrative. A narrative he bought and uses to pass of as critical thinking to defend his choice - Hillary.

"I look at the Evangelicals and I wonder, those values don't mean anything to them? All of those values to me are more important than anybody's skill in business or anything else because it tells who we are,"

Conjecture. And misleading. Again. Look at the alternative. Had Hillary been an upstanding individual with integrity and truly was the target of misogyny, then yes, he has a point.

She isn't and you're pissing in the wind wasting valuable time and energy. She's worst than Trump and we have a clear, proven track record of it.

I wonder if Pop considered the cynical ploy on the part of the media with the sexual allegations against Trump. Yeh, doubt it. We believe what we want to believe.

"That's what worries me. I get it, of course we want to be successful, we're all going to say that. Everybody wants to be successful, it's our country, we don't want it to go down the drain. But any reasonable person would come to that conclusion, but it does not take away the fact that he used that fear mongering, and all of the comments, from day one, the race bating with trying to make Barack Obama,"

Ugh. Argggh. 


          Emotional clap trap we've all come to expect from the left.  Notice the 'reasonable' person bit. No 'reasonable' person would want a gun. No 'reasonable' person would want 23 types of deodorant. It's presumptuous rubbish.  In my case, Obama deserved every bit of scorn and criticism he got. He played his part in creating this mess of a situation with his own divisive rhetoric and illiterate economic comments. The criticism is fair. To claim it's race baiting is lazy, lazy, lazy and an insult and part of the reason Trump won. Pop gives the impression of being an esoteric thinker but I'm not so sure. He seems to, when it comes down to it,  just fall back on the narrative when it suits him.


"The fact that people can just gloss that over, start talking about the transition team, and we're all going to be kumbaya now and try to make the country good without talking about any of those things. And now we see that he's already backing off of immigration and Obamacare and other things, so was it a big fake, which makes you feel it's even more disgusting and cynical that somebody would use that to get the base that fired up."

          Pop is losing credibility fast and furiously. First off, Obamacare fucked the middle-class. It was a piece of legislation flawed from the get-go and was enormously unpopular. It had no input from the GOP and was rammed through in the middle of the night. So let's not pretend this was a work of pristine goodness. Second, the rolling out of it was a gigantic disaster and yet another example of inept government waste. Never mind Obama flat out lied about 'you can keep your plan and doctor' and 'premiums would fall $2500".  As for Trump moderating. Yeh but notice he kept the least controversial parts - the pre-existing condition and keeping people on it until 26 years-old. 

          I don't know what his point is on immigration but I posed it below. Trump's immigration plan is exactly like Canada's. Pop needs to read a little more. And if you want disgusting cynicism I saw plenty of it under Obama and still more with Hillary. Right, she wasn't cynical herself during the campaign. Calling people 'deplorable' or 'bitter clingers' or telling them 'you didn't build that' is cynical and disgusting in my book.

           It's not the first time Pop does this. I remember during the Arizona immigration law (which was popular among citizens) he called it a 'knee-jerk' reaction even though they had been giving it careful deliberation debating it since the 1990s 

"To get elected. And what gets lost in the process are African Americans, and Hispanics, and women, and the gay population, not to mention the eighth grade developmental stage exhibited by him when he made fun of the handicapped person. I mean, come on. That's what a seventh grade, eighth grade bully does. And he was elected president of the United States. We would have scolded our kids. We would have had discussions until we were blue in the face trying to get them to understand these things. He is in charge of our country. That's disgusting."

I repost:

On Principles. 

Think about it. If integrity is sooooo important to them, on what what planet do they live to think Hillary Bleeping Clinton was a better choice? Yeh. Here's the thing. I teach my kid not to lie yet Hillary (i.e. sniper fire, Benghazi (where her and Obama's actions led to an innocent man being jailed etc.) does and did (going back even as First Lady) little if nothing but lie. I teach my kid to respect others. Yet Hillary holds them in contempt (e.g. she let her distraught supporters down when she didn't address them personally after the election, or the now infamous 'deplorables' quip etc.). I teach my kid to observe rules and the law. Yet, Hillary broke the law by having an unsecured private server while Secretary of State. Her irresponsibility was not just a spit in the face of American law but by extension to the people of the country she so desperately wanted to rule not govern. I teach my kid civil ethics. Ethics, in part, include when you're in a position of power or influence, you keep to accepted basic notions of 'dos and donts'. Hillary via her Foundation, broke this principal. She peddled influence and profited from it. A woman who has a trail of scandals including Whitewater following her. Which brings me to respect again. This behaviour shows an utter disrespect for the office and title she held. I teach my kid to stick to deeply held and observed principles. Hillary cynically slithers around leaving herself open to how the polls and trends swing (ie. marriage is between a man and woman). And what of women? This is a woman who, rather than stand up and take a principled stand, let her husband commit acts of adultery and sexual assaults acing as an enabler to his misdeeds. We're told she's a strong woman but acted weak and even unjust by destroying the life of a person in the process. The fact is, over 30 years, all I've seen from her is a sleazy and scandalous track record. Where there's dubious activities, you can bet Hillary was around it. 


And as if this wasn't enough and if you thought she'd be humble. She doubled-down on her sociopath behaviour the next day when she planted a picture giving the impression she was in thoughtful reflection in the forest and bumped into a sympathetic supporter. Turns out, thanks to blogs, that person was a staffer. 

Imagine this as your country's 'designated survivor'? Please!

Let's talk cynicism Pop. Please. By all means.


         "So that's my real fear, and that's what gives me so much pause and makes me feel so badly that the country is willing to be that intolerant and not understand the empathy that's necessary to understand other group's situations. I'm a rich white guy, and I'm sick to my stomach thinking about it. I can't imagine being a Muslim right now, or a woman, or an African American, a Hispanic, a handicapped person. How disenfranchised they might feel. And for anyone in those groups that voted for him, it's just beyond my comprehension how they ignore all of that. My final conclusion is, my big fear is -- we are Rome."


Quite an emotional mess and muddled logical fallacy topped off with a non-sequitur. 

I think the issue of racism not being a deciding factor has been well documented and hammered enough by several people. To keep saying it only proves they can't moderate their thoughts and quite frankly, I think it's deplorable to stick to it. There was much more at work and stake here. I'd like to mention, at this point, I'm not defending any of those things. Trump said and did it and he has to own it. I'm just contextualizing the whole thing and in the grand scheme of things, I think this is utter over-reaction. But I'd rather focus on the Rome bit being a history buff and all.

Leftists and liberals like to cherry pick the spots where they think Rome and America are similar - and usually the bad stuff. It's what they do as cynics and faux self-righteous revisionists. Very few progressives who play history teacher on the internet understand Rome. They're only interested in finding the parts that fit the narrative as Pop just did.

As John McClane once said, 'you think I'm fucken stupid, Hans?'

Where there were no bullets in the gun, there are no valid points in his assertion.

So. Is he suggesting Rome decline begins with trump because this is ridiculous. I wonder if his starting point, say, begins with George Bush, skips Obama (who pretty much is a mediocre version of Bush 2.0), and resumes with Trump (who, by the way, when you look at his platform away from the noise falls under the category of a liberal democrat)? His comment gives the impression Rome's fall was sudden and with one Emperor. Of course, it wasn't and was a long process much like how the barbarian invasions that crashed Rome was a long, slow evolving process. Pop may want to examine immigration under Rome. He'll find some interesting things that would make him rethink his Arizona position. 

Specifically, which period of Rome is pointing to? The Crisis of the 3rd Century? The Severan Dynasty? The Year of the Five Emperors? Rome is not like talking about Burlington, Vermont. 

 Is he suggesting Romans were racist? I don't know how you from 'I can't imagine what it's like to be a minority' to 'we are Rome' in one paragraph. THAT makes no sense.

You can't just say things to sound smart without especially a complicated subject matter comparing two mighty nations separated by 2100 years.

It's disingenuous and breaks how one should read and interpret history. More so if you plan to connect it to contemporary times. 

Comparing Rome to America is a fascinating subject but misuse it to make a cheap political point does a great service to this historical exercise. It demeans and ignores the plentiful complexities too numerous to discuss in a blog post or in front of the mics. It might play well with 'the base' but not to people who are actually well-read and not hijacked by emotions. The flippant use of Rome, I've come to see, is no different than when people invoke The Crusades in a pathetic exercise of moral and intellectual relativism.

Methinks and posit, Pop the 'je ne sais quoi' pontificator has some refining to do. Like he does with his line-up.

Tink, tink.




Blogs And Alternative Media Stand By The People; Mainstream Media Against It

I'm increasingly growing tired of people who still think the media is objective and performs and maintains some sort of 'professional ethic' denigrate new media and blogs.

It's actually passe.

Blogs are the Edward Snowden of the information era. Without blogs we wouldn't have had a platform for people to speak their minds and more importantly fact check the established legacy media which at this point is indeed clearly littered with liberal bias.

It was blogs, recall, that blew open the steroid scandal while sports journalists closed their eyes to it more concerned with maintaining their access and invitations to cocktail parties. When I used to hear guys like Wilbon flippantly reveal he texted athletes not as a journalist but friends, I knew the relationship was too tight to possibly provide any real journalism. Why risk losing being friends with Lebron, right? Not worth it.

But the thing that bothers me is they then turn around and claim to be 'gatekeepers' of hard news while bashing blogs.

Total fucking horseshit. Blogs were doing the dirty work journalists were too cool to do.

And it ain't getting better. Witness the recent comments from NBA coaches. How in the world are we to take them seriously given their sport has a history of substance and spousal abuse? Do they honestly think alienating half the population is wise and that people don't spot the hypocrisy?

The thing that keeps getting overlooked is many blogs are actually run by experts in their fields. Be it science, sports, economics, politics and yes, investigative journalism. Real bleeping journalists who take their craft seriously and with integrity don't give a shit about texting celebrities. They want to get to the source of the truth. They've been pushed out of the mainstream because they threaten the whole rotten elitist structure that has media, politics and celebrity conspiring against the population at large.

If anything this election showed was it blew open just how much they hold their readers in contempt. They didn't do their fucking jobs and quite frankly I have no idea how anyone can cite or source whores like The New York Times. How can you possibly trust them? Or NBC or any other fake newsite?

Blogs and the 'alternative' media (except the shrill clowns at The Young Turks) did us all a great service and favor. They warned and explained why Trump could win. They exposed Hillary Clinton for the corrupted, lying, inept, self-entitled, foul-mouthed, enabler of a serial sexual assaulter she is. We saw it plain her words thanks to wikileaks.

It's not The Washington Post who did it. It was the blogs who had their Woodward and Bernstein moment. When was the last time you read The New York Times do right by the citizens? How can they when they're busy cleaning up the shit of the DNC?

It's basic logic. Conflict of interest damages and destroys integrity. Simple. You don't need a $200 000 degree from Columbia to grasp this.

The media, to close, above all, did its part in fomenting the corrosive division among the people. Day in and day out we're told 'smart people' vote Democrat.

Fuck off.

Plenty of smart people with degrees are fully capable of being liars, corrupt and plain old stupid. Holding a fricken degree is not an automatic ticket to being intelligent or understanding human nature. Conversely, blue collar deplorables are fully capable of understanding when they're being insulted and can easily match wits with so-called urban intelligence.

I've met my fair share of assholes with degrees and I've met my fair share of naturally smart people without them. I've met racist progressives and I've met racist low-income people - though I'm pretty sure the former is a much more corrosive form of it since they tend to gain power and influence. Think eugenics.

So my progressive friends best to be humble. You're not that smart.

2016-11-12

What About The Children?

Parents are wondering what they could possibly tell their children after Trump's election.

Erm, how about, you know, grow up and say nothing?

The fuck is wrong with you immature nit wits?

Why in the world would you frighten your children over politics? They don't have the brain capacity to rationalize any of this and quite frankly it's stunningly irresponsible.

So quit it.

And stop pant shitting. Huggies is running out of diapers.

True Colours Flushed Out

Let's juxtapose.

Trump: Won't take a salary.

Hillary: Self-entitled sociopath with no class.






More Honest Liberals

Joe Scarborough:



These are the liberals who deserve to come to the table.

Honest. I don't know how genuine but at least common sense prevailed.


Trump Smashed The Narrative

Man oh man.

Man.

I am thoroughly enjoying Trump's victory. For a couple of reasons.

One, it signals the rational adults had enough and reigned the lunatics running the asylum. They let them do their thing of bashing Western civilization and acting like a bunch of brain dead carcasses (see university campuses for an example) and then said, 'Okay, children. Come in, wash up and get ready for bed."

The United States - the last line of defence protecting Western civilization - woke up and put an end to the forces that were denigrating it.

Trump doesn't even have to do anything. Sane people are just going to come in and clean it up.

And what are the left doing? Doubling down. Only those honest with themselves aren't pushing it - and by the way they're the ones we should extend an olive branch to. But suddenly everyone is getting beaten up - blacks, gays, Muslims, handicaps. As if the United States at its core are savages.

Of course none of it is true. I have a friend in Holland who is freaking out saying he won't come to America.

They have no clue what they see is all a lie. All set up by the DNC and the media hacks who served them - and probably a little Soros in there too.

Lies. I can't stress this enough. Everything you hear about alleged violence and even stories about Trump are all LIES.

Deprogram yourselves and see the light!

And two, it's smashing narratives. All of a sudden you can see Obama's spirit just....disappear like in ghost movies. The cynical, jaded and pompous pop celebrity governance of the last eight years are gone. No more talking down to citizens. No more divisive talk on race. SJW ignorant rhetoric will also recede. Gone.

This is not say there aren't any concerns. I'm a little wary of some of his potential nominations and there's still a possibility he governs like Berlusconi did in Italy.

Nonetheless, all things told, the United States did the right thing. They dodged a HUGE massive bullet by swatting Hillary away. Her karma was just bad and the country didn't need another four years of Democrat control.





Good For You Chris Matthews

You spoke with integrity.