The Untenable Logic Of Covidian Giibberish

The moral panic is in full bloom. Watch it. Observe it. Learn from it.

Whatever damage Covid did on its own, has been vastly surpassed by the faulty actions of man.

History dictates this was inevitable. Man is a fool. And a dangerous one when his tomfoolery is combined with fear.

The social and cultural upheaval being thoughtlessly endured through coercion is one that which we will have to live with the consequences for decades at this point. We were not able to reign in our fears and keep in check our impulses to abuse human rights. We just couldn't do it.

It is a morally challenged individual to accept people losing their lives over a medical procedure - particularly one without scientific foundation - and bizarrely accepting passports believing the rights they had prior to 2020 were a 'privilege' bestowed by national governments.

This was never the case. Our rights are enshrined in national and international constitutions. They are inalienable rights to which governments must protect; not take away. Under any circumstances including public health. 

It is a testament to our apathy and general ignorance that we assume our democratic rights will just...be there and resume.

It doesn't work that way. Once you lose a right, it becomes very hard to get it back.

One may delude themselves into a simplistic and sophomoric notion that it's worth sacrificing this small loss of liberty for security.

But what happens when this trade-off fails? What if, for example, the passports fail to protect anyone? Indeed, we know from the ever growing body of evidence that the measures in place from social distancing to masks and especially lockdowns didn't have any effect on the viruses course. 

It was all for nothing and now we've yet added another, if not much more dangerous, dimension with a proof of vaccination paper to just live a life.

How can this strike anyone, other than someone who has thoroughly bought into the Covid narrative, with a sensible mind and rudimentary grasp on history think this is appropriate or necessary?

We're in a very bad place in the West. 

If the mindset has shifted into a realm where people 'go along' with something without thought or under dubious pretences, everything we've created, fought and worked for since 1776 through the post-war era will dissipate in the blink of an eye and we end up with the same tyranny we defeated.

This points to a lazy and miseducated society made up of self-entitled people. They chose to take a vaccine. Some did it because they wanted to but many because they felt they had no choice. This is coercion and is unethical. Listening to bioethicists and academics who claim otherwise is nauseating and simply wrong. There is no justification for it. Unfortunately, at the moment, the courts are caught up in the hysteria and complying with illegal mandates. They're failing to uphold the rights of people. There is no 'balance health with freedoms' to be made. Our laws made that decision for us. Judges have failed the people and established law. Miserably.

It will be left to what's left of a small minority of people willing to fight to restore the rights we did not consent to give up. The rule of law must prevail and we can't abandon it. For if we do, the life we're about to experience is going to be much less beautiful. 

Do you really want to constantly show proof to enter any premise? What kind of life is this? For a virus that is endemic and barely more dangerous the flu and that comes with a very high survival rate? And by high,  I mean in the area of 99.9%. Not 98.9% or 97.9% or whatever. 99.9%. 

Furthermore, scientifically there is no rationale for any of this. The 'experimental vaccines' do not halt transmission. Nor to they confer immunity (and don't fall for the no vaccine is 100% effective lie. That's jargon designed to keep wth the dogmatic narrative that vaccines 'work') while, and this is key, vaccinated people are asymptomatic spreaders of the disease. What's happening is the vaccines are hiding symptoms enough so that if a vaccinated person is tested they come out negative (viral loads) which then puts them back into the general population to spread it!

In other words, the passports are a license to spread. In a bit of twisted irony, it is in fact the vaccinated who threaten healthy unvaccinated people.

They ARE LYING TO YOU about this.

So do pray tell. How is this remotely anything other than a) an admission this is a cynical punitive measure not designed for public health and b) gibberish? 

Don't mock people who warn that fighting to protect your rights is essential.

Because when you lose them, it will be too late. 

Poo-tee-weet?