One should ask if the bourgeois of Marx's time, and as understood by Marx (a very important point), are in anyway relevant to today's socio-economic makeup?
Of course, because the proletariat didn't exist either. The definition was artificial and served to justify the existence of the religion established by Marx.
One should ask if the bourgeois of Marx's time, and as understood by Marx (a very important point), are in anyway relevant to today's socio-economic makeup?
ReplyDeleteI get the impression it doesn't. It may feel it is on the surfac but I'm not sure.
ReplyDeleteOne thing is clear, the proletariat didn't triumph.
Of course, because the proletariat didn't exist either. The definition was artificial and served to justify the existence of the religion established by Marx.
ReplyDelete