2010-02-03

Zinn's Neat Trick

Count me in as one of those who never understood how Zinn's A People's History of the United States was so popular. I read excerpts and saw it less as history and more, well, like this blog. Just opinions.

But he pulled it off and the book sells damn well.

From Reason:

It's a mystery how A People's History of the United States, which has sold over a million copies and currently sits at number fourteen on the Amazon bestseller list, has become so popular with students, Hollywood types, and academics. It is a book of no original research and no original ideas; a tedious aggregation of American crimes (both real and imagined) and deliberate elisions of inconvenient facts and historical events.

Much of the criticism of Zinn has come from dissenters on the left. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. once remarked that "I don't take him very seriously. He's a polemicist, not a historian." Last year, the liberal historian Sean Wilentz referred to the "balefully influential works of Howard Zinn." Reviewing A People's History in The American Scholar, Harvard University professor Oscar Handlin denounced "the deranged quality of his fairy tale, in which the incidents are made to fit the legend, no matter how intractable the evidence of American history." Socialist historian Michael Kazin judged Zinn's most famous work "bad history, albeit gilded with virtuous intentions."

2 comments:

  1. Maybe, but I don't know...

    People like Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. are establishment mouthpieces who earn their livelihood by spewing propaganda that supports maintaining the status quo.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Historians will usually be seen as such. But here's the thing: Legit renegade historians don't really exist. You can't be. History has a spinal chord, deviate from it too much and you, well, become Zinn.

    I guess there's a plus in that they're willing to go off but in the case of Zinn, his problem is properly sourcing his contentions. You can challenge accepted tenets of history, but dude, prove it.

    Then again, I'm VERY conservative on this front. Rigid even. You're talking to a guy who doesn't believe Hollywood or its actors should EVER come within ten feet of history - unless they have some training of course.

    I don't go for this "at least they're bringing it to our attention" crap. If you bastardize the history it's worthless because the movies do have the power to corrupt minds.

    I digress. As usual.

    ReplyDelete

Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.