Private bills don't often become law. It says so right on top.
So why debate this insipid bill?
It started innocently enough, help out the families of the victims. Then, it morphed - looks like anyway - into nonsense.
For you unaware, the Bloc Quebecois introduced a Bill where, in a nutshell, parents of an injured youth criminal would get compassionate leave to tend to their child. In other words, if little Timmy broke his arm slapping a girl he was raping his mommy and daddy can take time off work and nurse him.
It gets better. WE GET TO PAY FOR IT!
Feel better?
So. YOU, insert name here, raise an upstanding child to the best of your abilities, will have to pay for someone else's criminal child. Why not just take care of your neighbor's kid at this point? Why shouldn't you have a say in how they raise their kids if you think they're on the wrong track? After all, you're paying for it, no?
And they say Canada is a "fair" society. Bah. There's nothing fair with 'one size fits all' and there's certainly nothing compassionate or progressive about this bill.
How did we arrive at the point in our evolution where we consider this to be a "just" way at looking at things?
Not surprisingly, the Three Stooges - Liberals, NDP and BQ - support this incredible bill.
Why not just not distinguish between a victim and perpetuator anymore? Don't we punish victims of bullies who fight back anyway? I mean, Quebec is the place where the supremely unfair 'No-fault' insurance was born.
Just more bad cues from the enablers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.