2022-11-25

The Public Hearings Into The Invocation Of The Emergency Act Concludes

Redaction controversy aside, Commissioner Rouleau did run a decent inquiry. I will not be critical of how he handled it because it was overall fair.

It's the result that will matter.

I've expressed my skepticism but I will await Rouleau's conclusions.

My thoughts on Trudeau's testimony will follow.

Thoughts On Freeland's Testimony.

Want to get out my thoughts on Chrystia 'Chrissy' Freeland before Justin Trudeau takes the stand and shits all over it.

I stand by Canada is run by emotional buffoons and Freeland embodies this characterization. 

How's that for coming out swinging like Mike Tyson?

Freehand, skillful pearl clutches that she is, laid it on thick with the economic threat to Canada posed by the blockades, particularly on the Ambassador's Bridge. While questioned by the government, Freeland was in lecture mode giving her 'esoteric' (even tearing up talking about how emotional she was caring so much for Canadians) thoughts like a soliloquy. Chrystia wanted you to know she was a deep thinker.

The more she spoke, the less you saw a spiritual and philosophical person and the more you saw just another calculating and controlling politician.

Under cross-examination, she suddenly lost memory and wasn't so 'profound' (a word she used a lot along with 'um'). She claimed to not be a public health expert but said the 'vaccine' mandates worked. She claims to not be an intelligence expert but put into evidence she jotted down in confusing handwriting that the truckers needed to be designated as terrorists. This apparently came at the behest of CEO's of banks in order to 'act quickly'.

They all needed to 'act quickly'. 'Acting quickly' is a euphemism for ignoring and rewriting laws on the fly.  Or like how 'fast developing' is a euphemism for 'we made up our minds'.

Much like how the unaccountable and lawless CPSO does when they pounce on a doctor they want to crush. 

Chrystia obliged. The law trailed the events as Chrystia put it. For such a deep thinker, she would know this is the very nature of law. It moves at the organic pace of human events dictated by human laws and nature. Politics generally understood this quirk in human affairs and adjusted. After all, many over the years have been lawyers.

But a new attitude is afoot. A generation of politicians who view laws, constitutions, charters etc. as suggestions if not quaint pieces of paper too antiquated for the fast pace world they operate in. In other words, they're above the law.

They not only acted accordingly but said so in their testimonies.

And made no apologies for it. 

Remind me who threatens democracy again?

Freeland's tactic was to depict the protestors as a direct and real threat to the Canadian economy. While there's no doubt the impacts were immediately felt in Windsor, it's not easy to see how that would have played out across the country. She focused on the compromised 'supply chains'. Suddenly, the Canadian government - as Algabra attested- was concerned for it and Canadian jobs. The 'supply chains' had long been in jeopardy. 

The Canadian Trucker's Alliance voiced concern that as many as 24 000 truckers were going to be removed from transport due to the mandates. When this was brought up, she said she followed the data of the experts. Except, you know, not the actual truckers. No, Chrystia prefers the expertise of the academic parasite class who produce nothing and offer little. Except to come up with bad models and find ways to mess things up.

Chrystia absurdly retorted that 90% of truckers were vaccinated and that didn't matter in a manner of speaking. But it flies in the face of her 'supply chain' concerns because the transport fleet was already in a difficult position, to begin with, and could ill-afford to lose so many truckers. I speak to truckers all the time, and her assertions were weak, especially considering they had been working throughout the pandemic (sitting in their trucks upon deliveries) since 2020. In other words, it was government action that closed the borders to solo drivers thus exacerbating the supply chains. This a classic example of the government making things worse. 

In any event, Would have been nice if they showed such concern - ahem - for the hundreds of thousands if not millions of Canadians who lost their jobs and careers due to mandates.  

Freeland's account of the precariousness of the Canadian economy was so thick and dramatic that it made you wonder if we're a one-trick pony economy. It, well, sounded so colonial. A, well, banana republic economy. We're, after all, a banana republic political entity at the moment. Changing laws, I remind, on the fly to fit a narrative is the very manner in which a banana republic under a dictator or despot operates. 

Freeland spent some time discussing her exchanges with the Americans. Keep in mind, the Biden administration is a pseudo-Mafia outfit busy making sure it allows the Department of Defense this mRNA experiment on the population. They're busy creating a perpetual state of emergency (as Colorado just did) while maintaining EUA's to keep the flow of injections going. So you're not going to get good governance advice or information from the Americans at the moment.

She discussed about how the deal with electric vehicles - I'm willing to bet EVs aren't going to be the main mode of transportation in the future - is key to her 'green transition' plan. The same vehicles, it should be noted. depend on several key components that need oil in order to extract. The government plans to have a battery manufacturing plant in Ontario. How very green. Go read how lithium batteries are made. She mentioned EVs because her goal was to show the protestors threatened this fantastic economic plan that Canada absolutely depended on. In her feisty 'fight' for Canadian interests, she told the Americans Canada wasn't looking for a free ride. Except it's still American technology. They just want to get to put a 'Made in Canada' sticker on it.

So.... a free ride by other means. But whatever.

The threat to our economic well-being was likely overstated as I've stressed. They needed to get the EMA invoked. They had to show they were tough and in the process sneak in some permanent features into legislation. Never let a good crisp go to waste.

I would love to read the Cabinet minutes. I can just imagine the shit show of genius sprouting off the mouths of their flapping heads.

The mandates are the poison. Not the protestors. Or as they say with contempt right down to even a disinformation runner like Katie Telford, 'occupiers'.

I kept looking for the witch's broomstick behind her. Her cool stance on uttering such phrases was chilling.

On hypotheticals. Every Minister charged they don't deal in hypotheticals. Except their entire premise rests on....a hypothetical. 

That is, the situation was so 'volatile' (Lametti is still shaking I hear) and about to explode in blood and violence; a powder keg ready to blow them to the moon they had to 'preemptively strike'. For Canada.

Preferably with tanks as Lametti and Mendocino 'joked'.

But Freeland, being a deeply introspective individual, testified they warned everyone. If you don't go home, we're prepared to block your mortgage payments.

You know, incentives. 

To Chrystia, abhorrent coercive actions like freezing bank accounts and vaccine mandates are 'incentives'.

"We had to find a way to bring it to an end'. So we ended the mandates. Oops. Better to freeze bank accounts." /wipes tears.

Just to recap. The protests came against the backdrop of the Canadian government fighting for 'democracy' in Ukraine (and as a good Ukrainian nationalist Chrissy helped herself to a good dose of Putin ranting. Know what Chrissy? Say what you want, Putin - heck, Trump for that matter, never froze bank accounts. You may think it was a 'measured' and 'proportional' response but sound minds endowed with a sense of ethics know it was not)  and working on a green transition through which critical deals with electric cars with the United States. 

Excuses to use the EMA. This was a carefully manufactured narrative being performed on stage in real-time. Freeland made for tragic theatre. 

The EMA = protecting jobs. Martial Law is needed to protect jobs, eh? Who knew?! Oh well, Trudeau 'saved jobs' by flouting the rule of law in the SNC-Lavalin case thus setting the tone of this government's approach ultimately manifesting in using the most aggressive 'tool' (a word they sure love) in the 'toolbox'.

Not sure who the flathead was. Chrissy or Justin. But we do know they all love hammers.

There was no mention at all of the mandates and concerns of actual Canadians. Freeland expressed profound appreciation for 'bonding' with lawyers and Canadians over the matter of protecting the economy, empathy for protestors and their cries to be listened to? Not so much. 

Freeland plays favorite with her children.

Freedom Corps. lawyer Brendan Miller got Freeland to admit the mandates were to force people to take the vaccine. Her tone and body language suggested this was an appropriate position for a government to undertake. 

When it was put to her people related to the protestors but not part of the protests had their bank accounts frozen nonetheless, she essentially shrugged her shoulders. You could almost hear her want to say, 'don't be related to criminals. We warned them. Too bad, too sad'. Like her colleagues, they claim this wasn't the intent but for such an 'esoteric' person she didn't consider 'unintended consequences?

Doesn't anyone read Bastiat anymore? Anyone?

We got a glimpse into the arrogant mindset of Freeland in her exchanges with someone named Flavio who was, I believe, a contact in the auto industry.

When he attempted to point out the mandates were causing the problem, she made clear it wasn't his place to say so. Opinions are bad with masters, understand? 

She just wanted to hear how bad the situation was so she could freeze bank accounts.

In fact, I posit and submit, based on their own words, they didn't care. It wasn't even up for discussion that at the root of all the mayhem in the civil order and 'supply chain' problem were the futile, cruel, vindictive mandates not rooted in science or data. 

Bottom line?

This is a government that played favourites. It was willing to dehumanize a segment of the population to get what it wanted.

Onto Justin Trudeau.


Please respond to my compassionate incentives. 


















They should have thought about it before being relatives to protestors.



2022-11-24

Disinformation And Misinformation: What's The Difference?

Very simple.

Disinformation is knowingly disseminating false information. Otherwise known as propaganda. Who are experts in propaganda?

Think 'occupiers' and 'threats to public safety'. The entire anti-truckers narrative was propaganda.

Misinformation is unknowingly spreading what could be erroneous information. Otherwise known as opinion. 

Neither are a crime but the government of Canada is conflating the two and basically saying citizens are guilty of both. Government are kind, honest and benevolent and would never lie to the public. In effect, the government should be censoring itself. 

And Justin Trudeau is a disinformation guru. 

In essence, the government is simply looking to silence opinion. Also referred to as freedom of speech and expression.

Understand the dirty tricks they play.


'Save Millions' The New God Complex Phrase Of Our Civil Masters

Have you noticed the latest trend among Criminal-ACME Anvil Inc? They like to say, 'we saved millions' a lot now. It doesn't have to be the 'vaccines'. It can be, for example, from  a certain Minister of Finance - I'm looking at you Michael Sabia -  saying the freezing of bank accounts was appropriate because there were  'illegal activities' and 'we saved millions of jobs.' Without citing a single source for the claim.

This nonsense of hyper-hubris all too typical in the new abnormal state of Covidistan began - as far as I can tell - with a mathematical model that claimed the 'vaccines' saved '20 millions lives'. Then Mannequin Jared Kushner promulgated this ridiculous claim with Larry Kudlow who played his 'yuk, yuk' part to a tee.

Sabia didn't save millions of jobs - mostly because the threat to the Canadian economy was over stated especially given the Ambassador's Bridge was opened before the EMA was dubiously forced on Canadians - just like the mRNA injections did not save 20 million people. In any event, that figure gets offset by the deaths and injuries it caused anyway. 

We're ruled by incompetent maniacs who are playing out the Peter Principle in real time and on our dime.




About That Reputation

Apparently, the reputation of Canada matters to the Liberals. It matters so much, they're willing to destroy Canadian rights to protect it,

Leave aside the endless stream of monumental scandals and the catastrophic failed restrictions and measures that led to curfews and an internal travel ban - a first in history - on unvaccinated Canadians. 

Sorry, Katie Telford. The vaccines don't stop transmission nor prevent infection. I suggest you throw away your 2020 manual and upgrade and get with the times and actual data.

Look at the secondary impacts of our hysterical over-reaction has done. 

Look at the CPSO which is now garnering international attention for turning us all into Randal McMurphy as they play the part of Nurse Ratched.

Allopathic medicine has completely lost its mind or common sense - assuming it ever had any.

Or the interesting lesson of Bill Blair. If Blair learned from G-20, how did he repeat a similar fiasco by supporting the Emergencies Act?

What about the more complex issue of the trucker's convoy. The Canadian government managed to extract the wrong lesson to focus on here. The perceived drop in reputation had long been set before the truckers. Had they loosened their mandate grip and shown intelligence, wisdom, courage and empathy, all this is avoided. 

But they just couldn't let go of the obsessive 'vaccine' narrative - and impulse to control.

If one thing we learned from the hearings, Lametti, Mendocino and Justin took it personally. And acted accordingly. The privileged bullying over grown boys had some toys to play with. My apologies 'tools' and they used them.

And then there's this forceful letter from Youtube scolding the Canadian government for its unnecessary and despotic Bill C-11 proposal.

Earlier this year, The Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11) was introduced in Canada with the stated goal of supporting the creation and promotion of Canadian content. We wholeheartedly support Canadian creators and Canadian storytelling, and we’re proud of the work we’ve done to-date to foster the creator economy in this country. New research from Oxford Economics shows that in 2021, YouTube’s creative ecosystem directly contributed $1.1 billion to Canada's GDP. This continued growth comes from access to an audience of billions, where Canadian creators can find an audience here at home and around the world. In fact, over 90% of watch time on Canadian channels comes from outside of Canada.

But what’s deeply concerning is that the current version of the Bill has the potential to disadvantage the Canadian creators who build their businesses on our platform, and change the personalized experience of millions of Canadians who visit YouTube every day.

We have a responsibility to our Canadian viewers and creators to inform them of changes to their online experience. And we think it's worth standing up for our viewers’ interests and creators’ livelihoods.

Let me explain why this is so important.

YouTube is a personalized experience for everyone, built on the principle of helping you find the videos you want to watch and will be valuable to you. And we use many signals to do this, including clicks, watchtime, shares, likes, and more. This helps us introduce viewers to new content and creators they may not have thought to look for.

In its current form, Bill C-11 would require YouTube to manipulate these systems, and surface content according to the CRTC’s priorities, rather than the interests of Canadian users. Put into practice, this means that when viewers come to the YouTube homepage, they’re served content that a Canadian Government regulator has prioritized, rather than content they are interested in.

When users are recommended content that is not personally relevant, they react by tuning out - skipping the video, abandoning the video, or even giving it a ‘thumbs down’. When our Search and Discovery systems receive these signals, they learn that this content is not relevant or engaging for viewers, and then apply this on a global scale. This means that globally, Canadian creators will have a harder time breaking through and connecting with the niche audiences who would actually love their content. That directly hits the bottom line of Canadian creators, making it harder for them to build a sustainable business.

In the spring we saw tens of thousands of Canadian creators raise their voices to share their concerns, but their concerns were not addressed. What’s more, millions of Canadians aren’t even aware of the bill, or that their online experience could potentially change.

Respecting the individuality of every user who comes to our platform and meeting their unique needs is a key part of what makes YouTube so special. Does it make sense for a regulator to curate your experience on YouTube to reflect the government’s priorities? We believe that the diversity of content, creators, and users is our strength and we want to preserve the rich experience that Canadians enjoy today.

This is a conversation that impacts so many. YouTube creators and Canadians must be made aware of what could change, and given the opportunity to ensure their voices are heard.

OpenMedia, a community-driven organization that works to keep the Internet open, has done significant work in this space to keep Canadians informed on the Bill. Canadian users and creators: If you want to add your voice to the conversation, you can sign Open Media’s petition here.


You were saying about reputation?  

It's All Academic Now

With Justin Trudeau set to grace the public hearings with his regal presence tomorrow, here are my final thoughts on the whole theatre show.

It's quite clear the government created itself a magical narrative and won't ever deviate from it or change their minds. Listening to the three runners for the PM tonight, that became apparent to me. Katie Telford made the ridiculous specious claim the mandates were rooted in science when we all know they weren't. We all know the government never consulted the real science or PHAC for that matter. They had a narrative - propaganda - to peddle. Otherwise known as disinformation.

None of this was rooted in anything really. It's been truly an eye opening experience to realize we're a country with not standing principles of any kind.

A country that's willing to amend the law on the fly because it 'takes too long' to do it through the proper ancient channels of law which forms the basis of legitimacy, is willing to ignore all the established scientific and ethical documents and charters we created in the last 70 years protecting medical rights and informed consent.

They simply ignored it all. In the process, they abused and made a mockery of the rule of law.

Worse, the soul of the country.

In the end, I don't expect much from Rouleau. He's too tepid and in deference to the government, it feels. 

This was just entertainment. Without the kangaroos. And smoking monkeys. 

The government of Canada under the Liberal party crossed the Rubicon. They invoked an act that wasn't needed and froze bank accounts. They believe it worked like they 'believe' the 'vaccines' work. Magical thinking passing off as virtue and science.

It's all academic now and they know it. They won. They made clear they never cared about what the protest was about. They reject it was about the relevance or effectiveness of the mandates and kept referring to protestors as 'occupiers'. I suppose some were but the vast majority of people were indeed protestors and the historical record - honest accounts anyway - will show this. This government chose to dehumanize and divide and it worked. They should be proud. Score one for realpolitik.

I never believed Canada to be a 'nation'. A nation to me is what we see in Europe or even the USA. Blood and guts spilled to form an identity. We were given a country, like Australia, and act accordingly. Like colonials with cuff links. Freeland's empty 'raw raw' pep talks are exactly what you'd expect from a colonial mindset. You can't rally a people with apathetic impulses and fair-weather pride. This is why we obsessively brag about vapid political symbols like public health.

We're a country with all the bells, whistles and appearance of democracy but with inner core values or principles. We're just people living on a piece of land. 

Duddy Kravitz's grandfather would say to him a 'man with no land is a nobody'. On these words, Duddy killed himself to get a piece of land and when he showed his grandfather he got one, he learned the grandfather actually meant a man with no NATION to attach himself to is without identity. That is a man without a homeland is not a man.

Many of us feel that way now.

That's Canada ironically, and I don't think that occurred to Richler when he wrote that. Or maybe he did? I don't know. 

Or care.

About 'Democratic' Ukraine

Ukraine isn't a democracy. At best it's a quasi-democracy.

The fact that Zelensky outlawed 11 political parties proves this.

Russia is an oligarchic authoritarian state.

Yet, interestingly, Russia ranks ahead of the Ukraine on the Democracy Index.

Canada, meanwhile, saw its ranking fall. And it has been slowly dropping under the despotic Justin Trudeau.

I mention this because, throughout the public hearings, government ministers kept referring to Ukraine as a democracy. It formed the backbone of their narrative and how it fit into the trucker's convoy.

They keep framing it as though it's a 'democracy v. non-democracy' scenario when it's simply not the case.

As for NATO, a pointless organization Freeland is apparently tagged to lead, it's best to remember it was designed to be a DEFENSIVE alliance against Soviet aggression.

It has changed its posture to an aggressive one now.

And that's not a good thing for democracy.

Right up Chrissy's alley. 

Freeland's Testimony

I'm going to prepare a post about her disastrously comical testimony of lies later but just wanted to make a quick comment.

One, Freeland's 'esoteric' shtick and disingenuous croc tears  point to a guilty conscience in my view.

I will explain how her testimony made no sense and didn't support the facts. The government is simply spinning the narrative into another direction. This time about trade and saving the economy that was allegedly so precarious it needed an EMA to freeze bank accounts.

On its fact it's absurd and Rouleau would have to be a fool to believe it.

I think her focus on the economy is not only debatable - we have not heard actual evidence from what the Americans said. Just second hand sources from the testimonies of Ministers - but actually undermines her entire premise.

She claims she was worried about jobs and businesses.

Where were those tears for the thousands, heck, millions of Canadians who lost their jobs and careers due to the mandates?

It's clear it's the mandates that caused all this anxiety and nothing else. There would be no need to hatch a plan to force an EMA had it not been for these loathsome mandates.

This never seems to factor in their heads.

The mandates caused the friction created wholly by the government of Canada.

Freeland (holding back tears): "If I may be personal. On my way here I saved a puppy....and a kitten, fed a homeless man a McMuffin (with the money I saved from losing the Disney + channel), helped a little old lady crossed the street that was once blocked by the blockading blockeaded truckers.....and saved a pinky toe....I love Canadians so much. That's why we froze their accounts."

Me: "It's so nice for you to care, Ms. Freeland. Chrissy if I may? But when the vaccines were shown to have been ineffective against transmission and infection, should the government not have course corrected? Rather, you chose to double down on the cruel mandates to stick it to the truckers. This only emboldened and angered them more, no? Is this the 'esoteric' thinking that went into your decisions?

Freeland (straightens up). Um, I don't understand, um, your question. 

Convoy lawyer Brendan Miller was especially on the ball today having none of her antics. All of a sudden, Freeland had memory lapses like Frank Pengangeli. She didn't know who Lich, Marazzo and Daniel Buford were she alleged. Simply not plausible. This government keeps saying they follow the news and boy were they all in the news. Bulford in particular as part of the RCMP security detail team for the Prime Minister. So, yeh, she was lying. 

I'll stop here.



The Public Hearing Into the EA Is Already Compromised

It took until the government liars showed up to spew their bull shit for Judge Rouleau - a Liberal-appointed judge by Trudeau. Hey, it's Canada. Did you expect fairness? - show his colours tipping his hand where all this will land.

I wanted to be fair but the fact he has denied several requests from Convoy lawyers to submit evidence and call witnesses suggests the fix is in. Or at least, he's doing his job with the 'pick and roll" tactic on behalf of the government. 

It was a good try but the government should never have dibs on who oversees these things.

Onto the National Citizen's Inquiry. It is there we will see the truth of what their actions did to people.

And it won't be pretty.

In fact, it will be hard to listen to.


2022-11-23

Couple Of Thoughts

 I find it ironic some of the biggest pushers of the 'vaccine' are cardiologists. Ironic because of the heart side effects. 

On disinformation, the government wants to fight.

f I understand the term 'disinformation correctly, it's deliberate misuse and transmission of wrong information meant to deceive, correct? Isn't this what we call 'propaganda?' 

And if so, who are the biggest pedlars of propaganda? The state, no? Followed by corporations partnered with the government or state - aka fascism. The merger of state and corporate interests. Of which, the media is a corporate entity that plays into this.

In effect, then, the government should be shutting itself down. 

Oh, the ironies of it all!

Lametti's Farcical Testimony A View Into The Soul Of A Weak Country With A Cruel Despotic Impulse

Putting all that I've heard from David Lametti into a coherent post is going to be a challenge. His testimony is one of the most eye-opening moments for me as a Canadian. For a couple of years I've lamented something is off with this country and to me, Lamett wasn't just giving insights into the mechanics of an Emergency Act but it allowed us a privileged journey into the mindset and soul - or lack thereof -  of this government. 

Through the testimonies of people like Bogden, Sabia, Jacques, Blair, Algabra, Anand, Mendocino and Lametti we see a group of individuals without any principles whatsoever. It's a government that is governed by a coterie of not just cabinet privilege - which is bad enough - but cabinet solidarity. What I'm seeing is a mafia-like entity within the government. A closed-off Cabinet that has been criticized for not even listening to its own caucus.

The disinterested body language, choice of attire and testy reactions to questioning all point to a group that clearly sees itself above scrutiny and perhaps even the law.

In fact, I've repeatedly argued this is a rogue government. An imposter democracy.

As I've said for years now, they're ideologues masking as nationalists. 

Before Lametti, we heard from Sabia who revealed the flippant indifferent nature to which our civil servants - and that's what they are servants - viewed their heavy-handed responses to what was clearly not a national threat no matter what they claim.  It's easy to lose sight of the fact the protests exploded because of the mandates created by the government. That the 'tools' such as freezing bank accounts were an obtuse, noxious and repugnant overreaction to threat. This is why the strategy from the government thus far has been to over-exaggerate the threat to national security. The response was not proportionate to the threat. Their lack of obligation to discourse made sure of this.

When all is said and done, there's no way Rouleau can conclude honking and parking violations rise to a level of national security threat. But I reckon he'll find a way. He'll mimic the government's 'loose' attitude to the law and the rule of law itself. The fact they keep referring to the rule of law only confirms they're willing to abuse it as they've done for seven years. 

This points to my last post about the voices in their heads. 

It matters little what Lametti personally believed - although I submit I believe he did make it personal when he said he tipped his hand revealing his overt contempt for the protests as not being legitimate and referred to them, as his comrades have, as 'occupiers'. Indeed, he barely accepted the peaceful protestors as legitimate because they were blocking streets and honking horns. When asked if there were legitimate peaceful protestors he said, 'I grant you that possibility'.

This is less a righteous man but one who believes himself a king it would appear. It's par for the course with this thin-skinned and arrogant Liberal party. Wholly unlikable. 

Alas, perhaps I'm being too hard on David. In a message to Mendocino he said 'Chief Slowly needed to act 'quick, quick, quick'. A line from his 'favorite movie' meant to be humorous. I had tagged to be a fan of 'Elf'. They all sit on a throne of lies, no? The situation was so 'dire' (to borrow a term from Anand's testimony" and Lametti so 'threatened' he had time to 'joke' about sending tanks. It was amateur hour at Yuks, Yuks starring Dave 'I'm just a human' Laaaaametti! /cue Vaudeville tune.

But he and Mendocino joking about tanks as they plotted to lie their way into Martial Law is no laughing mater.  On the contrary, it's stuff to take down despotic governments. Of which this one clearly is. Don't listen to me. Listen to their testimonies and read between the lines.

This sham of a testimony didn't end there. And here I thought Sabia and Mendocino were bad enough.

He said he had to split his time between Ottawa and Montreal saying, "I'm often alone and I would have been vulnerable". This from a privileged politician with a security detail. He made sure to keep reminding his staff is made up of women. All to create a setting where their safety was threatened. It was another example of the key tactic that has been the single key to this government's style of ruling: Through fear.

Just like any despotic cowards do.

It's worth reminding Justin Trudeau escaped Ottawa during the protests. Rather than stay and face it like men, Justin and David chose the passive-aggressive route. David's job was to beat the shit out of the Charter and EA and make it fit the narrative. He went as far as to admit his dictums extended to Americans when he said, "you ought to be worried' if you supported the protest in any way.

What a clear picture of the soul of this government.

He claims the invocation was narrow and short in duration but my guess is they had no intentions of keeping it short. The clear abuse was plain for the international community to see. The Europeans and Americans likely had concerns about the decision and some expressed it publicly. Canada's 'reputation' was being tarnished not by truckers but by the government itself. A government that lacked the humanity and humility to lay off mandates that had only political currency and did absolutely nothing to protect the overall health of Canadians.

Right. Like they did when they decided who was 'essential' and 'non-essential' destroying the lives of thousands if not millions through their mandates. The claim they worried for small businesses is a clear example of stank and stark hypocrisy.

It's quite remarkable alluding to 'mental health' Lametti claims the truckers hurt some people for a short period, which was never extended to the millions of Canadians who suffered through Trudeau's vindictive and cruel mandates which were the source of the protests in the first place. They act as though people aggrieved (and millions have been hurt directly by these ridiculous mandates) have no right to protest and then whine when they're questioned.

As an aside, I don't want to hear a public official say, 'good question'. It wreaks of paternalistic arrogance and presupposes they're our masters. Let's get one thing straight: Lametti, Mendocino, Anand, Freeland, Justin et al are servants.

And they must be deferent to us. That means having to answer all our questions and concerns without resorting to claims of 'misinformation' or feeling 'threatened'.

I really couldn't care less about David Lemetti's feelings of vulnerability. That he brought it up is something he needs to deal with as a man.

This can't be stressed enough.

He asserted, ironically, about the mental health aspect which I will delve into later. He further promulgated the usual disinformation tactic that the protests were blocking access to hospitals when in fact this was never a major issue as it was dealt with early on in the protests with police. 

David Lametti is a man of many hats and faces as he made sure to mention. He could conveniently weave around any line of questioning that got too close while getting full protection from government lawyers and ultimately Commissioner Rouleau. 

Indeed, lawyers cross-examining Lametti had time constraints and where they thought they could build a case, were stifled by typical government legalese about "solicitor-client privilege". Government lawyers could continue to repeat lies about the truckers (established to have not been true) without any resistance or objections.

All that was missing were actual kangaroos in the room. And a smoking money with a typewriter. 

It was clear we were not going to get at the truth with Lametti except for when he spewed the same overwrought claims Mendocino did yesterday. Which was - there were hypothetical threats.

It's quite interesting to hear him decline to answer hypotheticals when the government's entire premise rested on hypotheticals about the convoy degrading into violence. 

Which were never proven. 

But it never was about proof of anything or public health. Lametti himself basically said, smugly, the government can 'fill in gaps' between provincial and federal powers. I suppose laws evolve when you're busy not letting a crisis go to waste, eh Dave?  In other words, my characterization of this government playing Calvin Ball was correct. This is not a democracy. This is a banana republic. A regime.

Recall that Lametti is the Attorney-General that said Canadians have no property rights. At least I think that's the hat he was wearing at the time. The many faces and hats of Lametti indeed.

In the end, if the fear felt was sincere, well then Lametti et al. need to brush up on human nature. It is the government who accosted the people first. It coerced an experimental and failed gene editing mRNA technology into the bodies of millions without proper informed consent. They mauled Charter rights to pummel people into the desired outcome. 

This is the stuff of cowards and despots. 

As such, the principle of ethical reciprocity in the face of actual aggression applies I argue They claim to have been driven to not escalate the problem (even though it was Trudeau who engaged in counter-productive hate speech against the unvaccinated and truckers) and were looking for a "peaceful" end to the protests but in the end, they were looking for trouble. The tactic was to dehumanize truckers and the unvaccinated.

Always remember. ALL FOR A VIRUS with an overall 99.985%.

All this mayhem. For shame.

You didn't look good at all, David.

Onto Chrystia Freeland.

******

Please forgive if this post seems too free-form or disjointed, I did it in one draft and had to move on.

No time to proof-read.



Quick Comment On The Public Hearings

To those principled and astute enough capable of reading the proceedings and testimonials while further exploring the world of 'between the lines', know that this government wanted to invoke the act and made up shit to make it happen.

This is the tone I decode from the testimonials of people like Sabia, Laemtti and Algabra.

They all made sure to express their personal fears and to characterize the truckers as 'occupiers'. They all didn't seem to know precisely what the grievances were nor did they express they cared to know.

Because, in my view, it was pre-planned to invoke the Act. I bet that if we had access to the Cabinet minutes that's what it would show.

This government invents words (Algabra kept using the word 'blockaders') and narratives like it does laws.

The very definition of a banana republic.

The lack of wisdom, empathy and accountability on their part is unfortunate, disheartening and sad.

This government crossed a Rubicon they don't seem to be aware of.

Worse, or care.

The Lies And Misinformation From Canadian Officials Continues Anand Edition

Minister of defense Anita Anand made the claim that Ukraine is a democratic nation.

Ukraine is not and never has been a democratic nation.

It's a vassal state with the trimmings of a democracy but behaves authoritarian.

For example, Zelensky outlawed 11 political parties.

Our leaders fail on the basic level of truth to promulgate their pathetic war-mongering narratives.


The Difference Between Smith And Alberta And Legault An Quebec.

One is a true leader Beth dignity and integrity with a real action plan who cares and will protect Alberta.

The other is a whore who is selling the rights and privacy of Quebecers at any price to everyone.

Guess which is which.

Legault and Justin are hatching a disgusting plan where Legault sells our privacy rights to Justin who then gives it to the WHO.

Good job Quebec. You gave 90 seats to a greedy whore.

Listen to Smith.

Now look at the shit we have here.

You should be envious, sad and disgusted.

2022-11-22

Fauci's Gone But He Leaves Behind A Record Of Mayhem And Corruption

Not going to get into here but I just wanted to send my salute to Anthony Fauci.

Your mendacious lying won't be missed.

You will hopefully face the justice system or God's judgement.

Good riddance and take your brand of scientism with you.

I wish someone of high character replaces you but I'm not holding my breath.

NIH/NIAID needs a massive overhaul as do the fully captured FDA and CDC.

Now I wait for the day Tam leaves.

Fauci and Tam were the Peter Principle in real time and action. 



The Disinformation (Propaganda) Of Mendocino.

The government thinks this is a one-way street.

No.

They don't get to lie. 

Mendocino, who was out spreading this government's authoritarian censorship plans at the G7 or whatever pointless international summit they seem to hang out at, simply sat on his ass lying to the Canadian people today.

No.

Law enforcement never supported this government. 

Here are the receipts.

This government has never been honest with the public.

Mendocino was a train wreck. It promises to get progressively worse with Omar, Anand, Freeland and Justin.

Government lawyers will stall and Rouleau may interject but the truth is coming out.

Yes. I am saying the biggest threat to public safety and freedom of speech IS the Liberal party of Canada.

That much is clear.

But they want to silence the people and their voices. 

Not gonna happen Marco. 

Bring it on. 



What They Lied About

Ivermectin.

Vitamin D.

Natural immunity. 

They didn't want you to know.

Why?

Well, that's what an investigation is for.

We need to find out why. 



Public Inquiry Hearings Question

The invoking of the War Measures Act during the October Crisis in 1970 is now seen as an overreaction despite kidnappings and the murder of a politician during the October Crisis.

If murder wasn't enough to rise to a national security threat, what makes you think honking, illegal parking and a 'longer duration than we thought' rises to the triggering of the Emergencies Act?

Sr. and Jr. invoked the two most drastic acts in the governmental 'tool box'.

Sr. and Jr. wanted to come off looking like strongmen but were and are in fact sowers of discord. 

We're Ruled By Lying Psychopaths Who Spread Disinformation; We Know Who They Are

 Forbes. September 2020:

     "What would a normal vaccine trial look like?

Prevention of infection must be a critical endpoint. Any vaccine trial should include regular antigen testing every three days to test contagiousness to pick up early signs of infection and PCR testing once a week to confirm infection by SARS-CoV-2 test the ability of the vaccines to stave off infection.

Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected."

Didn't tell you that, huh?

We did though.

Instead, they said, 'Take the shot, end the pandemic."

People still think this and that the virus swirls because a handful of people chose to decline the mRNA lie.

They read through it. You didn't.

You should be angry.

Outraged.

Know why? Because they continue to abuse, bully, and LIE. 

Their spins are so out of control that none of it makes any sense. One infectious disease doctor from McGill - let's call him Don Vinh - arrogantly proclaimed you take the shots until you don't need it like antibiotics.

I'd rather deal with a used car salesman. At least I only lose money wth him.

With the experts, your health is in jeopardy and your dignity challenged.

Oh. It was never meant to stop transmission! Just prevent infection!

Oops.

Ok, they lower 'severe disease'!

Ok, chump.

Ask yourself this, if you get Covid how do you know? 

You don't.

That's the power of the propaganda - DISINFORMATION.

Capisce? 

They lied to you. There's no way they didn't know this early on.

Even Deborah Birx, Madame Lockdown Lunatic, admitted this in her book of strange admissions. It reads like she's repenting in parts. 'Go easy on me with the lashing!'

Always remember one key statistic that was in your face you should have heeded before downloading the passport app and listening and trusting assholes like Labos, Legault, Bombardier, Dube, Patrick Lagace, Josee Legautl, Don Vinh and everyone else who supported this vile tool of social engineering including Isaac Boguch, Colin Furness, David Fisman, Kieran Moore, and Peter Juni (who is employed at Oxford now fuckijng shit up there with his incompetence), Heather Mallick, Diane Francis, The Montreal Gazette, CTV News, Ottawa Citizen, Global News and everyone in between the rotten crevices of stupidity and still many others to numerous to name here including ultimately provincial health Ministers, Theresa Tam and Justin Trudeau, that the 95% effective claim was the absolute risk ratio (ARR). the overall survival rate always was around 99.985%. Your immune system was already telling you to calm down. How does a man-made product (for a virus created n a lab I might add) supplant God's immune system? It can't - and never will. The relative risk (RRR) which is the more accurate figure was 1%-3% effective. Yes, re-read that. That's why as time goes on, it enters negative efficacy and the propaganda demands you get boosted comparing your body to a dirty battery. 

Vaccines are a lie. All of them. Come to terms with it.

It's imperative that you understand they destroyed the civil order dividing Canadians along medical status lines culminating into the invocation of the Emergencies Act. It's easy to scoff at the truckers for their 'sanctimonious' rhetoric. But the reality is mandates were coerced on the premise everyone must take a medical procedure (in many cases against their will) even though the government likely knew they were not going to work. And the media danced and cackled like witches alongside these crimes against humanity. People lost their jobs over this. You can't overstate the depravity of what we did.

You should be appalled and horrified at what they've done.

The smart ones shut their mouths once it became obvious the 'vaccines' were a catastrophic failure.

Ask yourself this.

If the mRNA does none of what's claimed. And that they wane after a few months and you have to keep taking them like a treatment increasing the risk/reward/benefits/risk calculus and odds against you with each passing shot and given the facts above....

How in the world could it have saved '20 million lives'?

Hint.

It didn't.

Now they want health certificate passports. They want to pump all kinds of vaccines into you. Flu, Fentanyl, whatever. It's a financial bonanza. The more they sell, the more McGill gets from Bill Gates. The media gaslights you and solicits 'expert' advice from the same pool of corrupted pseudoscience.

Civilizations of the past often cut down business leaders who got too big for their societies be it a tribe, Kingdom or city-state. Bill Gates and George Soros are two men who should be at the top of the list to confiscate their fortunes.

Why?

Because their behind every single vile project known to man. Soros purposely rigs elections in an effort to weaken democracies to profit off them. Gates is working on various forced vaccination schemes including micro-chips and Q-dots, 'Morality pills' to induce compliance and supported by bio-ethicists, and even climate change scams and schemes like blocking the sun which the Biden administration is set to attempt.

These people are going to destroy the human species. They're so blinded by hubris, they think they can control and defeat Mother Nature.

So deluded in their arrogance, it's not a surprise they will always scream for masks. They won't stop.

Only when you show you are strong, free and fearless will they back down.

This time, however, it won't be enough.

We will need to make an example of them.

Justice we want.

And we want real justice.

For the sake of humanity and our future.

Say no to the bio-security medical tyranny they're creating.

You can start by one simple step: BE AWARE.

Once aware, you stop repeating their jargon to informed people.

You sound and look like an idiot saying, 'wear a mask' to (insert whatever nonsense here).

You sound and look like an idiot repeating their cynically crafted lies.

Stop.

The power really is in your hands. 

You can engage in direct action too.

The National Citizen's Inquiry is one way.

Get involved.

******

Shake the walls.






2022-11-21

Repent

 



Your compliance and the 'science' were on the wrong side of it everything,. 
REPENT. 

On Reputation

Canada was so concerned about its reputation during the trucker's convoy it invoked Martial Law arguably damaging it.

Throughout this Covid catastrophe the country and its citizens got everything wrong and our reputation we so dearly want to uphold has been tarnished.

Whether we like it or not.

As I've stated. What reputation? A nation with no principles and wallows in fear has no reputation to preserve. 

Two highly disturbing developments in Canada have us in Nazi territory. One, is MAIDS - assisted suicide. The other is CSPO suggesting doctors drug up people who decline a vaccine.

Don't try and spin this. It's as bad as it reads.

Look up Unit 731. 

This horrifying unit that made the Saw movies tame by comparison went under the title "Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department of the Kwantung Army."

Notice the term 'Epidemic prevention'.

Understand where 'preventative' thinking can take us? 

Do you?

You better.

And fast.

Because the doctors will take us there faster. 




About that public health system Canadians keep insufferably bragging about. It's 30 years it ranks near the bottom in the OECD. If we cares about our reputation, why then was this never addressed properly?

And now they cry you need to be in a mask and take endless boosters to protect this piece of garbage institution. 

Our rep is no different than Easy Susie. 








The Monsters In The Government Of Canada's Head

What I'm learning during the public inquiry is that the Canadian government thinks like a parochial, banana republic. 

It had been decided long before any intelligence gathering was considered, the government had decided they want to invoke the Emergencies Act and acted accordingly. In fact, they had prepared legislation to extend it into the future. Case in point, Freeland making the ability to freeze bank accounts permanent. 

Today I heard David Vigeneault's testimony.

From what I can tell, he confirmed there was no real threat but still suggest the Emergencies Act was necessary to quell the protest even though he also testified he wasn't an Emergencies Act expert. What permitted Vigneault to make this 'recommendation' is that there was despite no evidence of threats to national security, they permitted themselves a 'broad interpretation' of the CSIS Act.

We call this stretching the law to fit a narrative. And that's all this government did from top to stinking bottom. In "The Wealth and Poverty of Nations" there was a line by author David Landes that never left me. 'Injustice perceived is injustice felt'.

Welcome to Canadian law and justice.

Brendan Miller is trying to get at the truth. The only way is to ask uncomfortable questions and he's prying but meeting with resistance. 

The whole system seems incapable of grasping the severity of their own actions based on the foolish premise of applying some sort of distorted version of the precautionary principle to thwart any threats - which I repeat didn't exist - national security. 

Hence, horns and parking violations made the cut on what constitutes a threat though their 'broad intrerpretioan'.

The entire public inquiry has been a shit show showcasing the fact that confused, incompetent and foolish people are in charge in this country.

If I could summarize this mess in pictures it would be the following:

Here we have Calvin Ball where Calvin & Hobbes play a game that allows for rule changes on the fly.




'Broad interpretation', 'racist' hence BAD TRUCKERS! 

And:



The other part that infuriates me is the government's constant citing of January 6 as if it had any bearing on anything. Two assumptions are made that are not supported by facts. Despite the pony show trials by Democrats, Trump never supported or called for any storming of Capitol Hill. Footage and his tweets lay this to rest. The other is that while things got out of hand, it was not an insurrection in the classic definition of the term. Police, recall, were waving people in for crying out loud.  And it also neglects the fact there had been incidences of 'occupation' in the Texas and Wisconsin legislatures during the Women's and BLM protests. That was democracy in action though.

And let's not forget AOC shamelessly inserted herself into the proceedings claiming her life was in danger. Even though it was discovered she never was actually on Capitol Hill.

The hearings continue but I've seen enough to get the gist of how the brain - and soul-  of this bureaucracy functions. 

And it ain't impressive. 

The enemy has presented itself.

It is us.






Labos's Lament Part 2; Hysterics Continues Apace In Canada

During the pandemic, the refrain was Canada was no better or worse in their response than most countries in the West. The Restriction Index indicated otherwise, but this was the common defense.

Now that we're in 2022, we still remain in a closed loop logic in Canada that several countries have broken out of - though the stink of Covid-19 illegal mandates and over reach remain.

I don't think one can mount much of a rebuttal that Canada by far is stuck in 2020 in the way it approaches not only Covid-19 but all diseases now.

Our greatest fear of simply succumbing to fear and reactionary superstitious 'layers of protection' as a normal approach to health is coming to fruition.

Common sense is completely out the window.

In the Globe & Mail today two doctors - those voices of reason - ar hyperventilating screaming about how 'the kids aren't alright' and that mask AND flu vaccines should be required.

What was never needed or a common health approach is now being forced upon people in real time. 

Are we going to react this way every time a perceived public threat challenges us?

Are we going to seriously use kids as human shields - for their protection they tell us - to protect society and a dysfunctional public health system that apparently will crack if a lady bug sits on it?

It's complete madness at this point and I hope parents start to listen to the little voice in their hearts and minds telling them this is all excessive.

RSV is not a major threat to children. And one must ask themselves why this is happening? Don't break your too hard. I think the fatality rate is .00047% for kids. I've been reading from experts not in the throngs of big pharma or corrupted by politics or clouded by a distorted precautionary principle stance, that RSV will rip right through the population and recede just as fast.

They once again warn against over-vaccinating in the middle of an outbreak lest it delivers more cases.

In other words, human intervention will make it worse just like it did Covid-19.

I don't see any Western nation reacting like Canada is.

******

Labos. 

Our favorite hyperventilating shill cardiologist from McGill. A while a ago I posted Labos's Lament and here's another as I multi-task juggling work.

He's out there peddling masks again.

Like many of our TV Dinner Experts (TM) are. 

I'd take Labos seriously if he wasn't so obnoxiously obvious in his cherry-piecing of data that misleads his viewers. Who these people may I don't know. CTV News - and CJAD and The Moooontreal Gazette - has been a champion purveyor of bad information from day one.

Just a couple of examples.

Naturally, as predicted, he ran with the Boston mask in schools study. A study that has been ripped to shreds by independent researchers and experts. 

Masks don't reduce transmission and never will.

That's what the real data shows.

Even if it does 10% - and for argument's sake let me concede this - it more than loses its edge with the harmful negative impacts they can cause.

Which people like Labos completely neglect. 

The other important part of the equation is did you ever hear him cite RCT studies from Finland, Barcelona, Tennessee and North Dakota which firmly refute his claim?

Did you ever him talk about the RCT study from Johns Hopkins from earlier this year that concluded lockdowns and restrictions were largely ineffective? Or the largest RCT mask study to date from Denmark also showing their negligible effectiveness?

Of course not. He has to sink with this ship as he's dogmatically invested quite a bit of his street cred into this nonsense. 

The Boston study is not an RCT study and therefore not as solid in its findings.

Or how about the fact Europe stopped masking kids and have zero intentions to reignite this divisive issue because it accepts they had a negligible impact while at the same time did likely pose some pernicious impacts.

Nordic countries, for the most part, kept their schools and daycare opened since 2020.

Labos laments. Let him wail in his pool of superstitious pseudoscience. 

Nowhere is this an issue. Not in the EU or U.S.

Yet the drum beat of fear and hysterics continues apace in Canada.

Why is that?





Hang Your Heads In Shame

When God came to us and tested us, you failed.

God didn't give us 'doctors, scientists and vaccines.'

He gave us free will, a mind and an immune system. Mind, body and soul.

You chose to abandon God's work and bowed to the idolatry and superstition.

And hate.

Hate driven by fear masquerading as compassion.

But compassion without love and empathy anchoring it leads to all sorts of dark places.

The authorities and scientists, without wisdom, have convinced you a 'vaccine' is salvation. Denying salvation, they say, leads you to death and hell.

These weren't the words of science but of Satan.

It was deception.

Masks and potions are a sin. Inorganic to human nature.

To all who said vile things rooted in sheer ignorance and fear; in blind trust and hysteria.

To all who supported - and continue to support abhorrent unethical responses like 'health passes' and 'passports' and applaud and cheered a segregated society.

Hang your heads in shame.

Don't declare amnesty.

We decline amnesty.

Ask for penitence. 

For forgiveness.

You failed God's test of eternal love and peace.

Now you must atone for your sins.





2022-11-20

Quote Of The Day

  "No risk it, no biscuit. You can't live scared." His former quarterback in Arizona, Carson Palmer, says, "You play for him, you see he just has guts. He will let it rip, let it fly no matter what."

For the attentive, we see how many celebrities, entertainers and athletes have been sidelined at an astonishing rate. It manifested itself in concerts and tours being cancelled, early retirements due to long-term injuries, and sadly, deaths.

I don't cover this here (if you want to keep tab head over to Mark Crispin Miller's Substack), but as a former sports junkie, the case of former Tampa Bay Buccaneers coach Bruce Arians caught my eye.

Particularly the above quote.

Apparently, Arians was what we could describe as 'hysterical' about the threat Covid posed.

So he pushed hard for his team to get vaccinated and proudly declared this.

Which makes the quote fascinating.

If I understand it right, his risk-reward assessment seems to be backward.

Taking an experimental mRNA injection on the premise that it's 'better than nothing' because you simply don't want to catch Covid therefore you're showing courage is faulty in my view.

It's the opposite. 

Not being scared is precisely why you should have declined the shot given there was absolutely zero information about it except for the flapping gums of government authority figures and academic experts.

Blind trust ain't courage. It's running scared.

And they put living fear in people in order to soften them up to line up and take these low-quality and dangerous products that in the end didn't live up to the hype and promises. 

Arians is right. 

You can't live in fear.

Just not for the reasons he thinks.






2022-11-19

J'Accuse! Lay Criminal Charges Against PHAC, Ontario Ministry Of Health, And Orders of Physicians For Misinformation Endangering Public Health

When asked (about Kieran Moore partying maskless holding a drink in one hand), the Ontario Ministry of health responded by saying "He follows many layers of protection including screening daily for symptoms of any respiratory infection, practicing good hand hygiene, staying up to date on immunizations, masking when necessary and distancing when possible."

It is shocking and astonishing that this remains the narrative in Canada.

None of these 'recommendations' have been proven to work.

We're 2.5 years into this. We've had multiple studies showing most of these measures or NPIs are futile. 

We know excessive hand washing is not healthy. And that several hand sanitizer brands are made with toxic chemicals posing threat to human health.

We know social distancing is a farce. Deborah Birx and Robert Redfield admitted it publicly. Moreover, that it never had any basis in science as it originated in a high school project.

We know excessive testing only fuels fear. We know PCR testing at high cycles distorts and conflates cases and infection. We know PCR generates a high false positive rate.

We know masks are completely useless as the scientific literature overwhelming points to their ineffectiveness. Fauci knows this as does Tam. Evidently, Moore agrees. They've said so publicly prior to the lockdowns. It is not lost on me that just prior to the global response our public health experts were following established science. Then they switched in a matter of weeks. The question is: Why? Worse still, we know surgical masks were invented for bacteria and have absolutely no ability to protect from viruses. 

So-called experts, usually physicians, paediatricians, and infectious disease doctors, aren't industrial hygienists and therefore mask experts. Just like how the medical establishment refuses to educate the public on sterilizing and non-sterilizing vaccines so as to release tension in the public, they do not explain the difference between aerosolized and droplet transmission. Given that this virus is aerosolized, and therefore renders hand sanitizing almost moot, they also render masks moot. If they'd explained this, maybe we wouldn't see people wearing masks outside in the fresh air and alone in their cars.

What about KN94 and N-95 masks? They wear them in Japan! And? It's beside the point. That's cultural. The West doesn't hide their faces and science was on our side all these years. This obsession and fascination about assuming how 'respectful' and intelligent Japan and Asia are when it comes to respiratory illnesses is mostly a hit job to get people to comply with a noxious social habit. It's a form of social engineering using cherry-picked data and information. The concern here is we've allowed an assumption to become a fact. Hence, this is why you're not seeing a mea culpa about masks but rather calls for cultural change to accept them.

Based on junk science.

These masks were created for dust particles used on construction sites predominantly. They are not meant to be worn all day long and need to be swapped every couple of hours. They're not healthy alternatives. Last, masks in community settings are a bio-hazard. We know this. Improper handling of masks - of which 100% of people are guilty, especially children - only exacerbates health risks as they could lead to more infections all the while not stopping transmission.

Anyone making this claim is ignorant, misinformed and not being honest.

In a recent video, Tam revealed the depth of how regressive public health is when she claimed she wears a mask to prevent asymptomatic spread. We know asymptomatic spread is rare and poses no threat to public health and has never been a main driver of outbreaks. This ceased being an issue in most places in early 2021 yet it seems to continue to persist in the closed-off realm of PHAC?

I will leave aside the foul and cruel push to mask children aside as it also could constitute criminal charges on its own.

"Extra layers of protection" is another vacuous phrase - medical 'verbal virtuosity like 'flatten the curve' - dreamed up by our health officials and behavioural scientists. It's alleged 'staying up to date' and masks are 'extra layers'. Neither on their own provides protection so how can both suddenly offer protection? 

The idea your immune system is a battery that needs charging with man-made 'boosters' is absurd on its face. Our immune system is far more complex, mysterious and powerful than that. Public health officials demean the power of the immune system - thus ignore natural immunity in the process - in order to promulgate a dubious public health narrative.

On the vaccines, Canada finds itself in a precarious situation. The College of Physicians for Ontario sent a memo to doctors suggesting that if people decline vaccination that they should be put on psychiatric medication. Imagine what they would do to me for writing this post! In fact, we're in a situation where exercising your right to bodily autonomy while holding different opinions from the prescribed and official narrative makes you a threat to 'national security. This isn't just unethical. It's evil. It's the state and the medical establishment joining forces to pummel our personal sovereignty. We should all be worried. Very worried.

Furthermore, continuing to ignore providing beneficial advice outside the scope of the pharmaceutical machinery also constitutes malpractice and enters the realm of malfeasance.

To wit:

We know antivirals like Ivermectin do help to reduce symptoms when administered early. 
We know Vitamin D and C are useful in maintaining a healthy body.
We know sleep and exercise are important.
We know, above all, natural immunity is real and is a biological fact. 

If natural immunity is not real, how did we survive as a species until the roll-out of 'safe and effective' vaccines - the alleged miracles of medicine - prior to mass immunization in the 1950s. Do pray tell how childhood disease exploded in the 1980s and 1990s as we expanded the vaccine schedule?

It is time to revisit and rethink our positions and long-held beliefs which appear to be less rooted in science and evidence and more in faith and dogma. 

Yet, public health and academic experts continue to ignore these simple preventative options and refuse to update their protocols choosing instead to use questionable 'vaccines' as a means to a medical end and selling them as though they're a panacea. 

Why do they continue to not publicly state this?

Taken on the aggregate these useless recommendations distort the reality of the threat. Public health continues to not properly inform Canadians that the mRNA injections are non-sterilizing and therefore cannot stop transmission and do not prevent infection which they promised was the cases and the basis for mandates. Indeed, small and fraudulent clinical trials never tested for transmission. Citizens continue to be divided due to the conflation of non-sterilizing and sterilizing immunization. This crookedness has led to a global response that has shattered Constitutions and Charters and (allegedly) protected civil and human rights and ushered in a bio-medical security state (including potentially global vaccine certificates that violate medical autonomy) in its place. Otherwise known as medical tyranny.

There is no excuse for public health on any level to be peddling these pseudoscientific and superstitious anymore as they ultimately damage the psychology of people.

Canadian public health along with behavioural scientists and Orders of Physicians across Canada are experimenting with Canadians and are engaging in a campaign of misinformation.

If they can't adjust to the facts and course correct, then I demand the resignation of all public health officials who continue to mislead the public in this manner. They must cease and desist from their campaign of fear through these obtuse and obscene claims immediately.

If they choose to continue to engage in lies, I submit criminal charges should be laid for reckless endangerment causing bodily harm to the well-being of Canadians.

The hysteria must end. And it begins with holding people to account for their actions that fuelled the chaos in our civilization.