Dealing With SJW Retards: With Update

"Robby Soave, Staff Editor at Reason.com, delves into how Title IX, dogmatic concepts of consent, and neo-Victorian behavior codes by college administrators are encouraging and empowering a culture of victimhood."


How to deal with a SJW.

Here's the thing about an SJW. Sometimes, the person acting like one isn't aware they are carrying the social justice warrior sword.

I specifically have to deal with one in my hockey pool of all places. A couple of character traits I've come to discover with such a mindset:

They are ultra-sensitive.
They willingly lie because they believe their cause to be righteous.
They spin and don't argue in good faith.
They engage in circular logic and sophistry.
They project, presume and project and then double-down.
They will shamelessly accuse you for the very indiscretions they commit.
They lack self-awareness.
They attack and claim they're defending a cause.

In my case, apparently, my steadfast defense of free speech and intolerance for self-appointed politically correct nannies is meaningless for they will allege you are the one trying to shut down free speech and promote the frightening anti-liberty hysteria on campuses.

When in fact, I'm reacting to his own misguided interpretations of a comment he chose to be offended by.

In other words, someone makes harmless comment. Somebody takes offense on the premise it may be hurtful to someone (while never presenting concrete evidence it has or whom it may have injured). If this be rejected and rebutted the person will double down and attack you personally (while accusing you of doing the same) while going off on a wild tangent. For example, because he did not find the comment humorous it naturally means it is open for an attack never once acknowledging humor is a subjective enterprise.

Title IX is borne straight from the mindset of such a person.

Let's delve into the actual controversy.  Please be forewarned. It's incredibly stupid. Here's the comment that set SJW Ninja off:

"so your 18 year old daughter instagrams a picture of her in bed with jagr.

you both a hockey nut and father you feel

a) proud
b) upset
c)angry she did not invite you to watch
d)have lots of questions
e) wondering why she is banging guys roughly your age
f) all of the above"

Now. Any sane and sensible individual with a remedial sense of humor will take this for what it is and wouldn't bother to seriously answer. It was meant in rhetorical jest.
More importantly, it doesn't cross any line of indecency. There were no names; no picture as this wasn't directed at anybody.

Not to the SJW Ninja. There are no such distinctions.

There are potential victims to protect out there! Cue Song of Roland!

SJW Retard makes his grand entrance:

"You have no daughters."

Problem with this? Neither does he. So he is dangerously entering presumptuous territory. Please tell me he won't cross this Rubicon.

(In response to person saying he misinterpreted the point of the joke): "No... I know the story. "


No he doesn' know the story. He knows his version of it. SJW Retard saw all he needed to see. 

He intensifies his SJW Crusade:

"So, you're asking (inserts my name), for eg, to take his daughter (misnames her), a grade school kid, and imagine her as 18 and naked, having just fucked a man more than 20 years older than her, and sending her post-coital face on a selfie out on the internet with the intent of blackmailing the guy  

"And tell the rest of us what he thinks?

This is what you're asking?"

No. That's not what he asked you disingenuous hack. Not even remotely close. 

No, he didn't acknowledge the name error if you're wondering. SJW Retard has no time for such details.

"Politically correct, (inserts me)?
You think?
This is the sort of thing you like to think of with your daughter?

I don't think so. 
Why don't you ask (inserts my wife's name)?

At this point, he's just plain unhinged filled with faulty notions that somehow we'd agree with his  position.  

Okay. Now I'm livid. Who does arrogant SJW Retard think he is? And why is he dragging my wife into this?

He's such a pompous ass, it doesn't occur to him A) he went out of bounds and B) she could possibly disagree with him. He explains down thread why he brought her into it. It's nonsense as it was a cynical ploy to try and strengthen his argument. Along the lines of 'if you don't agree with me ask your wife she surely will because she's not stupid!'

For the record, she disagreed with him. Completely.

She suggested I don't respond because she detected he was enraptured and settled in his sense of superiority. 

But I'm stubborn and tried to humor him.

Bad move. The SJW possesses no sense of humor. 

Read on.

"I think you should, both of you, grow the fuck up."

All because we disagree with his premise and argument. 

Again, he's purporting to speak on behalf of those who have a daughter. I don't think I can mention this enough. It points to his delusional sense of worth.

He does not conceive of the notion that perhaps we don't take offense and that his nannying is all for naught. It has no point except to cause friction.

Now, I suppose I this point I coulda made the following comment:

Had 'X' said 'for a philosophical discussion...' and proceeded with his comment, then perhaps SJW

Retard is correct to enter the fray and present his arguments.

Alas, this is not what happened. All that was presented was a humorous quip meant to be rhetorical as I pointed out. 

That being said, there were two ways to answer. 

The Commentator And Wife (since SJW Retard brought her into this) Way. That is, with an 'LOL''. 
But SJW Retard wouldn't like this because it demeans and pokes holes in his narrative. And this being the better route, he can't tolerate and will simply question your taste in humor.

Spin that circular logic SJW Retard!

In his retarded way this means we implicitly accept his view and are bad parents. Retard won't consider that we can both have a sense of humor and raise our child properly; whatever that may entail in today's hyper-sensitive climate.

In fact, we're teaching her NOT to be sensitive and not take offense easily lest she brings home SJW Retard home for dinner. The temptation to ram SJW Retard's pompous face in a hot bowl of stracciatella soup would be too great for T.C.

We will teach her to critically learn what is a joke and what is not. And to know when to tell SJW Retard to fuck off because sometimes people need a good telling off. 

I'm happy to report my daughter has a wicked healthy sense of humor.

Or, to continue, one could engage in a rational discussion by which I could have said, 'Well, one would hope by the age of 18 you instilled the proper values in your daughter. However, if she chose to go this route I can but express disappointment given she is an adult. Popper and Skinner on the other hand...' Or some shit.

Or. I could have just raised my arms and said, 'Kid's a whore. What can I say? She's on her own and outta the will.'

But that would make SJW Retard's sense of self-righteous gibberish explode. How dare I speak ill of my own child! 

In any event, we can think without SJW guidance. But I chose not to go this route because fuck SJW Retard.

I don't have to explain jack shit to him or her or it.

Onto more sparking SJW logic:

"No, my friend, YOU read it again."

Whatever! I do what I want!

The above was SJW Retard's response to the original commenter pleading hyper SJW Retard to reread his joke.
"You asked the poolsters with daughters, all of whom (except for those of inserts poolsters name) are still children, to imagine their daughters as 18 year olds sending their picture, post-fuck, out over the internet."

I hope by now you're spotting SJW Retard's thought process by now.

Here's where (I will just refer to him as Retard* from now on) he doubles down on his presumptuous and arrogant nonsense. In here, he obviously feels it appropriate to speak on my behalf. And because Retard is incapable of understanding the idea I disagree, he ignores it and plows through. Because retard.

"Amongst the options you then offered  these poolsters was, as a father, whether they would be angry that their own daughter had not invited them to watch the fucking. "

I really hope he's not projecting because this is creepy as fuck. And notice he's a fucken, outright liar defaming this guy. He dangerously about to accuse him of being a sexual deviant.

I invite to scroll up. Did you think this? I bet you didn't.

This is SJW Retard reading things that aren't there projecting and losing their marbles in the process.

Who the fuck do you think you are?

Right back at you Retard.

Think about it. 

Again. Back at you...Retard.

"I like you, but this stuff is garbage of the lowest, most puerile sort. 

Please, do not Email me on this again. 
If you want to continue the thread, cut me out."

Baby Fucking Retard (lying in the snow as if clubbed by a baseball bat) then makes one more asinine comment about his opinion on humor and then wants to take his ball and go home.

Little Wittle warrior is wounded. 

He can't understand why we laugh at him.


*Why Retard? A Backstory. A couple of years back I made the mistake of saying something along the lines of 'the little retarded boy' in a stupid joke. As you can imagine, SJW Retard went off on a tirade. I don't remember the details but it was pretty traumatic in a small way. Traumatic in the sense of having to deal with a sensitive nut case. Worse, he alleged the reason why he took issue with it was because someone in the pool had a retarded child. After snooping around, I discovered there is no such boy. He flat out lied hoping I wouldn't ask questions because SJW Retard is a sociopath. He made it up. Just like Rolling Stone made up the UVA rape story. All to fit a narrative.

Even if you call SJW Retard out on it, it wouldn't make a difference because it's the symbol and metaphor that counts; the idea of the defending someone out there that matters. They accord themselves one long leash.

SJW Retard would have us send trigger warning all over the place if he could enforce it. Right then and there I realized I was dealing with a SJW.

That's the backstory.


At this point of SJW Retard's freak out show, I responded with a pic of Fry from Futurama.

And one from Calvin and Hobbes. 

The first because that's what I thought of his commentary and the second to highlight how SJW Retards always see monsters under the bed.

We're not done because SJW Retard has much to impart:

"T.C. You're a conservative guy."

I am? Shit, SJW Retard says I am so I must be. Drink!

"Are you a Catholic still - or is that all gone?"

A religious non-sequitur. Hm. He's smarter than the average SJW Retard. I may have to rethink calling him a retard. But let's see where this goes. I'm a pretty optimistic guy.

I wonder if he knows I consider the current Pope to be a commie.

"Because, if you are, why don't you take (poolsters) original Email and show it to your priest?"

Never mind. I'll stick to retard.

"Tell him it was pointed out that the "humour" amounted to asking men to imagine and sexualize their daughters - currently still children.

Tell him it was pointed out that the "humour" proposed a scenario where men would be pleased to imagine themselves as voyeurs to their daughters having sex, even more pleased that they were invited to watch by the daughter herself.

Ask him what he thinks of that "humour" and its contained sexual fantasy of fathers and daughters.

Or, if you have no priest, then why don't you discuss it with your wife, or your mom and dad?"

Know what's worse than a Retard? An insufferable one who doesn't accept his an insufferable asshole. He's such an epic retarded assholes, retarded asshole think he gives them a bad name.

As for my mother, she would just give me a blank look and ask if I want more cutlets.

"Because to me this sort of thing , with all it's implied degradation of values and family, with its degradation of respect for self and others, this is not humour."

SJW Retard should send his resume to 'Focus on the Family'. 

SJW Retard likes to pretend to be a critic on Rotten Tomatoes. SJW Retard doesn't like South Park, Louis CK and Daniel Tosh I reckon.

"You're a really nice guy, T.C., you read a lot and you've got interesting opinions.
I respect you.

So, with that opinion in mind, I say to you that your cartoon responses (below) were beneath you."

This is a faux-compliment and an appeal to emotions. SJW Retard tinks Im stoopid.

"You should know that Rino's "side", the one you are backing in such a rote fashion, is the politically correct one here.
The other side is the one that actually requires from you a little thought, and a little personal courage."

Yes. SJW Retard did just present himself as a courageous hero. Hey look. I'll give him that. He is, afterall, an asshole, er, I mean Retard. 

Yes. He did say we were the PC ones. 

Yes he did. /sad face. Soft face palm.

I don't think political correctness means what he thinks it means.

'X' he's also a very nice person; works hard, loves his kids, and all that.
But what he wrote, and meant to be funny, was actually very disrespectful on several levels and not funny at all.

I still really like him, no change of opinion there, but even so you can't let stuff like this pass unchallenged.

And anyway, isn't that supposed to be what you, yourself, set out to do, way back when?'

Swing that SJW sword retard. Swing, Corky, swing! Run, Forrest, Run!

Make sure it's made of rubber because you're liable to hurt yourself.

Yuk, yuk, yuk.

Just to show you how balanced and fair I am I did push the envelope with this:

Your fellow poolster, the Grand Master at the local busy body shop, makes wild presumptuous accusations about your parenting skills because you dared laugh at a remedial joke, scolds you for your child’s lack of Vitamin R in her diet, while recommending sensitivity training for a 'white privileged' comment you made about terrorists who just killed your fifth wife because 'terrorist lives matter'. He goes on to suggest you watch ‘Full House’ and 'Welcome Back Kotter (the ones with Beau) reruns to help deal with micro-aggressions, hands you a Latter Day Saints brochure, and a guide to trigger warnings from Berkeley, as he demands you sip tasteless gluten-free rice tea. If not, he will report you to the authorities. You:

A) look and listen on in disbelief while nodding politely while plotting your escape but an evil nurse stands by the door.
B) stuff alcohol doused cotton up his nose and in his ear and up his nose with a rubber hose.
C) feed him into a woodchopper you happen to carry around with your flame thrower.
D) ask him if he’s a dope fiend.
E) take your child, wrap her up in a gender-neutral blanket and run away.

F) smash the delightful cartoon he keeps on his will of Stalin over his head.
G) none of the above.

If the above pics didn't work this certainly wasn't going to impress SJW Retard. And he didn't disappoint again:

"Boy, all ad hominem attacks these days. 

Shows what ya got in the quiver, right?

Will you also be dying your hair orange?"

Yes. Yes he did. King of the Ad Hominen was claiming an ad hominen attack! If I was the sort of guy to keep a long memory I would post the nasty insane shit he wrote when I had the temerity to publish stats that didn't paint his little hero Carey Price in a shining light. It went something along the lines of, 'Price has a .917 save percentage, same as Jaroslav Halak'. 'You petty little twirp who lies with stats' was the gist of his response. No attempt to discuss the statistics. Just went off like a lunatic. When I tried to engage, it only seemed to anger him more. It was like dealing with an autistic kid.
Well, I for one, laughed. Especially letter 'C'.

SJW Retard made one final assault. He was not to be swayed by a lowly plebeian such as me:

"No apology necessary for me, I truly believe that you can't help yourself. 

Some might call it passion, some might call it a problem with impulse control. 
I'm not sure what to call it. 

I know what to call it. Because you're a projecting retard.
....the only reason I mentioned (wife) was because you always speak of her with such respect. 
And because I remember that she's a teacher. 

Another thing SJW Retard lacks: Self-awareness. Impulse control would have meant he sat down, read carefully the joke, taken a deep breath and let it go.

"I really do think you're a good person, but I also think you have a certain "tone-deafness" in these things."

Yes. Yes he did.

It's worth mentioning I'm not the only to take issue with SJW Retard. Over the years he's had problems with numerous poolsters. He, by the way, I might add has said far worse things as others have pointed out but didn't make a Federal case out of it because they're not SJW Retards.

Because he's a jaw-dropping, ball-busting, trouble maker. He hides his vapid crap behind a tick flatulence of pseudo-intellectual assertions.


"You are aware, I'm sure, that one of the basic characteristics of a
personality disorder is that the affected is absolutely, 100% certain that
the problem is with the other person.

This. This was awesome. Worthy of a frame.

As for the PD. He's projecting in my humble opinion.

I concede I too can be a jerk and have my own demons (Germaphobe here), but that's not one of them.

"*And then there are  the PC, themselves. *
* I think you'd do fine on today's campuses, shouting out the insults. *
*It's all ya got. *

I'm exhausted.

"Also, you seem to unfailingly take the side of what seems edgy, the modern day PC side for sure. 
The other side is the "Calvinists", etc., as per your insults to me. 
You'd fit well on a modern campus. 
To tilt at the windmills of the PC these days, you have to align yourself in the other direction. 

I do urge you to bring this whole thing  to someone you respect (which is obviously not me) for perhaps another point of view. "

Yes. Yes he did. He did say, I, The Commentator who diligently logs stories of civil liberties aggression for you all, would fit well on a modern campus.

That's exactly what he is. A Calvinist. 

His mendacious lack of awareness is exactly the sort of asshole we're vigilantly fighting against. He's the sort of moralistic jack ass, all cozy in his cocoon of self-righteous arrogance who would set up gulags galore the second he found out where the guns are because 'greater good'.

There is nothing more dangerous than an educated SJW (in this case doctor) who takes up the mantle of social justice.

"No man is so tall as when he stoops to help a child". 
Lincoln (?)

What a hero. What a guy.

What a retard.


Update. SJW Retard makes another appearance. SJW doesn't like being challenged.

Here's how he tries to justify he's retarded antics:

Sorry I got wrapped up in my Yahoo draft.

We're off to an (irrelevant) start.

"So yes, it's true, maybe I am over-sensitive about jokes featuring child/adult incest and the sexualization of children - if that's possible.
Because I don't think they're funny."

Aaaand? This is our problem because...? Notice SJW Retard expects to just wants us to shut up just because. He will add his own personal experience as to why we should somehow try and think about every possible reactions to what we write. SJW Retard wants his trigger warning. Probably because he's surrounded by ingrates and reprobates.

See, I'm not "modern". I'm not some cliche libertarian with today's PC ideas.

Libertarians stand diametrically opposed to Affirmative Action and Political Correctness (two concepts that fall exclusively in the progressive left camp) you idiot. They don't accept state coercion restricting speech based on the non-aggression principle, idiot. They are intolerant to the actions of censorship, idiot.

Therefore and not surprisingly, you have it backwards.

 "It's a sad fact, I am not proud of it, that I saw my first case of child abuse in the Children's ER about 37 years ago.

I was a student, I remember all too well that child and the whip marks up and down his body.
This wonderful staff doctor,  tried to teach me how to be neutral and "professional".
So I try, but it doesn't always work."

Once he realized I wasn't bending to his appeal to authority he shifted tactic and went emotional in hopes of us 'accepting' why he's a SJW Retard. Emotional blackmail and emotional rescue!

Oh. And irrelevant. What he just wrote doesn't justify the stupidity he wrote up above.

He's an arrogant ass. He presumes no one has seen such cases. We have seen heart-wrenching stories at our day care too. But SJW Retard is a sociopath; possibly a narcissist with God-complex issues.

I'm guessing.

Another angle to this is :

"I see bad things ergo you must not write that because not funny and
you're an idiot for not seeing it my way."

What SJW Retard demands we do is the very definition of being PC - to try and write without offending; which is impossible. It degrades free speech and expression. I can't account for how people will react and quite frankly won't try and guess because it's insane and unproductive.
You have a right to free speech; not the right to not be offended.

And the years go by.

Yes. Yes they do. Especially to waste time on a SJW Retard.

 "I've seen so many things, things that would wrench your heart.
Or anyway they brought tears to my eyes.
Really, I honestly tell you, that on this subject I am in a completely different league than you are."

/Pagannini plays softly in the background.

Lemmonwinks speaks.

Only SJW Retard sees pain. Not you, you lowly trivial plebeians do not. /kicks dirt on plebeians feet.

Seriously. He just let that conceit mask slip. That line sums up perfectly the perspective he came from.

'My past and present experiences trump yours so shut up and just bend to my authority and feelings."

"So don't presume that you have the right to tell me what I can or cannot say on any subject, or in any circumstances.
But particularly on stuff such as this.
I don't have to have a daughter to speak out."

I ask you dear reader. Did I presume anything in this entire mess of sparking SJW Retardation?

I think it's best you scroll back up and re-read what initiated this madness to remind you.

That being said, SJW Retard is conflating two things. He is absolutely correct he has a right. What he doesn't have a right to is A) speak for me as he did without permission and B) have a right to not have his premise challenged.

Argue the facts; not the emotion.
HUGE difference SJW Retard would rather not understand.

 In the end, it was you who originally intruded yourself into the issue.

No. No I didn't. You brought me in the second you professed to speak on my behalf asshole. Hence, I was correct to challenge you not only on this but the premise you laid out to spew your SJW Retardation.

"I suggested that you take the "joke" (and my response) to someone else, whose opinion you respect, and ask them what they thought. Your replies have been gratuitous personal insults and spluttered bluster.
Actually quite disappointing - but I don't suppose you care."

No. I don't care. I responded as I did because that's precisely what SJW Retard deserves. You can eloquently write a sane, lucid, logical argument and assholes like this will not care. Because, you know, he's in a different league. That's why. I know, I did exactly that and it went right over his retarded head.

So. Yeah. Fuck you.

After I had had enough of SJW Retard I broke down every single one of his assertions in a decently enough civil manner filled with examples and valid points and counter-arguments. 

SJW Retard responded by saying he will not read my long email (suddenly word count mattered to SJW Retard) and:

"I did read this one, though - so my answer is that you can go fuck yourself. 

Actually, imo, you're a loudmouth know-nothing, a pretentious little twit poseur with delusions of intellectuality. 

You, a writer?

Don't make me laugh. 

The proverbial rolling of the eyes and personal attack.

I win.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.