Here's a list of academics seeking the government imprison skeptics of climate change:
David Straus, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
EdwardSarachik, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Michael Wallace, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland, College Park,MD
William Lau, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
TN Krishnamurti, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Vasu Misra, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Ben Kirtman,University of Miami, Miami, FL
Robert Dickinson, University of Texas, Austin, TX
Michela Biasutti, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
Mark Cane, Columbia University, New York, NY
Lisa Goddard, Earth Institute, Columbia University, NewYork, NY
Alan Betts, Atmospheric Research, Pittsford, VT
Assholes. Dangerous fucking assholes. Every single one of them.
Do you understand why I rail against this? They want to put people in prison for an opinion.
Think of where where this can lead to.
Think.
Think for once in your worthless, petty progressive mindset. Think of what kind of mind that seeks to make a criminal of citizens.
Think.
They're the true extremists and enemies of science and history; as well as economics.
***
To the left, the ideals of liberty enumerated in the Constitution is a nuisance to their narrative. Hence, they call for its "reconstitution" because "things change". They mock the parts that don't fit their contemporary world view and reject those they don't agree with (ie the Second Amendment).
This is why you only see articles and essays about "scrapping" it come from progressive or liberal publications.
Same with the Magna Carta.
Our entire Western heritage on liberty came by way of Roman codes, the Magna Carta, the Enlightenment and the Constitution.
Guess which side refutes it?
That's the irony I find in all this. In the end, the left sides with Marxist and Communist; authoritarian and totalitarian thinking. They come bearing gifts as "democrats" but they're not.
Do you see libertarian or conservative professors writing letters like this?
No. Because they possess an intangible the left doesn't have: Respect and tolerance.
From The New Criterion:
"...The danger in all too many cultures is that popular mandates over social welfare are employed in order not only to overthrow liberties but also to redefine freedom. The guarantees offered to freedom and liberty by a proper understanding of the two great bases of Western civilization, law and history (both secular and religious), are under threat from the combination of statism and liberalism, a combination that makes for illiberalism. An understanding of the foundation of Western liberty is important in confronting this challenge."
David Straus, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
EdwardSarachik, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Michael Wallace, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland, College Park,MD
William Lau, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
TN Krishnamurti, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Vasu Misra, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Ben Kirtman,University of Miami, Miami, FL
Robert Dickinson, University of Texas, Austin, TX
Michela Biasutti, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
Mark Cane, Columbia University, New York, NY
Lisa Goddard, Earth Institute, Columbia University, NewYork, NY
Alan Betts, Atmospheric Research, Pittsford, VT
Assholes. Dangerous fucking assholes. Every single one of them.
Do you understand why I rail against this? They want to put people in prison for an opinion.
Think of where where this can lead to.
Think.
Think for once in your worthless, petty progressive mindset. Think of what kind of mind that seeks to make a criminal of citizens.
Think.
They're the true extremists and enemies of science and history; as well as economics.
***
To the left, the ideals of liberty enumerated in the Constitution is a nuisance to their narrative. Hence, they call for its "reconstitution" because "things change". They mock the parts that don't fit their contemporary world view and reject those they don't agree with (ie the Second Amendment).
This is why you only see articles and essays about "scrapping" it come from progressive or liberal publications.
Same with the Magna Carta.
Our entire Western heritage on liberty came by way of Roman codes, the Magna Carta, the Enlightenment and the Constitution.
Guess which side refutes it?
That's the irony I find in all this. In the end, the left sides with Marxist and Communist; authoritarian and totalitarian thinking. They come bearing gifts as "democrats" but they're not.
Do you see libertarian or conservative professors writing letters like this?
No. Because they possess an intangible the left doesn't have: Respect and tolerance.
From The New Criterion:
"...The danger in all too many cultures is that popular mandates over social welfare are employed in order not only to overthrow liberties but also to redefine freedom. The guarantees offered to freedom and liberty by a proper understanding of the two great bases of Western civilization, law and history (both secular and religious), are under threat from the combination of statism and liberalism, a combination that makes for illiberalism. An understanding of the foundation of Western liberty is important in confronting this challenge."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.