I have no patience for the likes of the St. Jean Baptiste Society.
They can dish it out but they can't take it.
I find it most unsporting that in a province that's done nothing but offend minorities in recent months succumbing to 'tyranny of the majority' that they would then turn around claim 'francophobia' is on the rise in Canada.
The fucking geniuses running the little nationalist camp seem to confuse legitimate criticism of appallingly disgusting laws with "Quebec bashing."
Let's call this 'boy cries wolf.' The SSBS and the OLF make a living harassing us so fuck them.
This whole divisive mess has revealed a) Quebec politicians are void of values and principles and b) are nothing but slaves to votes.
Imagine my profound disappointment when Liberal leader (and I use the word loosely) Phillippe Couillard basically said his party agrees with "large parts" of the Charter.
The. Fuck?
Et tu brute?
If there's any clear example that there is NO party in Quebec represents the interests of non-Francophones this is it.
The bottom line is, while Marois gayly trots European lands lying her way through claiming we're 'unique', I will counter we're anything but. On the contrary, as I've oft repeated, Quebec is not unlike the deep south.
The only difference is they mix it in with progressive gibbberish.
Quebec plays with the rights of all its citizens (of which I'm currently ashamed) just like any banana republic ruled by a tin pot dictator. No surprise given its natural appreciation for South American totalitarians like Che, Castro, and Chavez - to say nothing of Arafat when he was alive.
Tinpots are gonna tin pot. What? Did Marois not cynically take to the streets banging on pots during the stupid student protest?
In any event, not to go Godwin on this post or anything, but I think Marois looks cute in a moustache.
You want a divided Quebec?
You're gonna get it.
Assholes.
****
The London arts community doesn't seem to recognize Obama is probably the least transparent and most dictatorial President in history. Not surprising given how much they loved communists and fascists back in the day. Mind you, when you have soft tyrannists, faux-conservatives like David Brooks calling not for less concentration of power in the executive, but more, you know liberty has lost the plot.
Obama has been called, not unfairly, Bush 2.0, Black Nixon and Mulatto Nixon.
Now try and tell me this is not weird and creepy. Notice the picture of him wedged between Jefferson and Washington.
Word is Lisee asked for a similar set up in Quebec's National Tyrannical Assembly.
****
We have to kill business to have more business.
It's the French way.
France. Holy shit what a shit hole of socialist garbage that place has become. Income can be taxed as high 110% in France.
People are fleeing with good reason.
"We are French," Montebourg said. "Wehave a tradition to help people, to protect people. The questionfor us is to find a good balance between protection and what youneed."
Where have I heard this drivel before. Hang on. Oh, Quebec!
The mythical balance! Problem is when you try to balance things one side eventually starts to take over and tip the whole fucking thing over.
Quebec's 'model' as Marois put it, is predicated on other people's money. When it's gone, she gone.
Same with France.
And Europe as a whole.
*****
Speaking of the myth of 'balance.' Just like I don't think a real 'balance' can ever be found in economics (what is the equilibrium point of reference?), I don't believe you can do the same for free-speech.
Only arrogant, naive progressives can accept such folly.
All around me people are attacked mercilessly for opinions by organizations and opportunists.
The latest is Phil Robertson; patriarch of the Duck Dynasty clan.
I won't bother getting into it here but while the left tolerates all sorts of horrible opinions (Matthews comparing the GOP to North Korea, idiot actresses like toy girl Jennifer Lawrence calling for the ban on the word 'fat' (did I not call this?) and whatever derogatory phrases they have for people they generally disagree with including the Catholic Church and religion as a whole) they sure go on the smug offensive when they hear things they don't like.
As you all know, I'm uncompromising on matters of free-speech.
You can't muzzle free-speech. All you do is allow private thoughts to fester in the minds of people - which I argue is far, far worse to society.
I'd rather hear right up and front what people think that way, as a free and open independent mind, I can choose what I agree with and not.
Ah, therein lies the rub.
We can't have that in today's hyperbolic, paternalistic, politically correctness driven, skin-thinned sissy, pussy society we're constructing in the mold of what nanny-state statists believe it should be.
Honestly, who gets to decide what's "proper" and "acceptable" free speech? How can we possibly believe this is achievable? Mark Steyn, you must explain yourself to the gargoyles and the Human Rights Commission, but Chris Matthews, you're okay? It's retarded.
As it stands, our intellectual discourse has degenerated so much that I don't believe we can turn back without a tipping point of some sort. We make enemies and criminals of people who exercise their right to FREE SPEECH.
Is anyone listening?
I'm the enemy in such a world.
That's why I give the big middle finger to anyone who attempts to justify suppressing freedom of expression and speech in all its marvel.
That goes for pieces of shit nationalists in Quebec and their intellectually and morally defunct apologists in their ranks and media, and any entity, persons, organization, lobby group that seeks to suppress and coerce rather than debate in the halls of liberty.
Fuck them all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.