Not me. I know I'm always right. Bastiat:
According to these writers, it is indeed fortunate that
Heaven has bestowed upon certain men — governors and legislators —
the exact opposite inclinations, not only for their own sake but
also for the sake of the rest of the world! While mankind tends
toward evil, the legislators yearn for good; while mankind advances
toward darkness, the legislators aspire for enlightenment; while
mankind is drawn toward vice, the legislators are attracted toward
virtue. Since they have decided that this is the true state of
affairs, they then demand the use of force in order to substitute
their own inclinations for those of the human race.
Open at random any book on philosophy, politics, or history,
and you will probably see how deeply rooted in our country is this
idea — the child of classical studies, the mother of socialism. In
all of them, you will probably find this idea that mankind is
merely inert matter, receiving life, organization, morality, and
prosperity from the power of the state. And even worse, it will be
stated that mankind tends toward degeneration, and is stopped from
this downward course only by the mysterious hand of the legislator.
Conventional classical thought everywhere says that behind passive
society there is a concealed power called law or legislator (or
called by some other terminology that designates some unnamed
person or persons of undisputed influence and authority) which
moves, controls, benefits, and improves mankind.
Bastiat. Always right.
"CLAUDE FREDERIC BASTIAT was a French economist, legislator, and writer who championed private property, free markets, and limited government."
ReplyDeletehttp://mises.org/page/1447/Biography-of-Frederic-Bastiat-18011850
Doesn't sound like a modern liberal, does he?
I found another worthy quote from that article I cited:
ReplyDelete`Like today's neo-conservatives, nineteenth-century socialists branded classical liberals with the name "individualist," implying that classical liberals are opposed to fraternity, community, and association. But, as Bastiat astutely pointed out, he (like other classical liberals) was only opposed to forced associations, and was an advocate of genuine, voluntary communities and associations. "[E]very time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists [mistakenly] conclude that we object to its being done at all."[17]'
Bastiat so thoroughly eradicated the false premises of his detractors it's frightening. That's precisely the MAIN point of argument and contention libertarians (the closes thing to classical liberalism we have) make: The non-aggression principle. They have no problem with government per se. It's the application of state-sanctioned aggression (fines, jail time etc.) they oppose.
ReplyDeleteBluntly, they're right.
The left completely (and hopelessly) fails to see this in the abstract.