Life works in mysterious ways.
As a person who spends his fair share of time improving his knowledge in the never ending quest for truth, let's just say I'm not a fan of Hollywood celebrities. The more I dig, the more I loathe their superficial and transparent ideological bent to the point of eliciting pity.
There is nothing more banal and useless than a celebrity pontificating and offering their views on the issues of the day. So much so, it's painfully obvious to an informed mind they have a tenuously shallow disposition. It's almost as if they read one book and presto! Expert!
And boy do the shameless ignorant bots in the media at large eat and drink it up!
It's so bizarre you have CNN's Jim Acosta lambasting Trump's meeting with Kim Kardashian as unacceptable. This from a guy who interviewed some guy named John Legend (?) who met with Obama. In fact, has there ever been a more insufferable President who did the celebrity shtick more than Obama? His presence on the late night show and ESPN circuit was ubiquitous. No one seemed to care then, right? How many hip hop stars visited the White House? These aren't exactly the 'cream' of our society given their rap - excuse the pun - sheets. Mind you, they go hand in hand with crooked politicians and sycophant 'journalists' like Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow and our dear Mr. Acosta.
And what of Kim? Here's a person whose claim to fame is she put out a sex tape and just...exists. Hey, all the power to her as people seem pulled to the Kardashian clan for some reason. Free markets and free minds as they say. Who am I to judge?
But she did manage to get Trump to listen to her on prison reform and he responded by pardoning Alice Johnson.
It's a small gesture. Perhaps a token one given the sheer amount of people who languish in prison under unfair sentences. But maybe this is the start of something bigger?
And once again, progressives are just showing their true colours if they dismiss this significant act.
Two years into his term Trump has managed more on social issues than Obama did. He's enacted tax reform. He's working on immigration reform and now prison reform. He signed a 'right to try' bill to boot.
In the process, he's showing to be much more progressive for ALL Americans than Obama ever could.
All issues past Presidents - most notably Obama - simply yapped about but did exactly jack shit. This is the part where fans of Obama scream, 'but he tired! GOP obstructionism! He was waiting to make deals!"
Yeah-k I say. Can it be he never was really into those things?
An interesting aspect to all this is Kardashian requested a meeting with the President to plead her case. She used her popularity and leveraged it to get into the Oval Office for what I think is an important issue.
Rather than partake in counter-productive marches and engage in pointless screeds against the President, she worked with him.
And this exposes the shallowness of Lebron James, NFL players and other 'woke' virtue signallers.
While they chirp and squawk from the comforts of their privileged status, Kim actually did something concrete. Steve Kerr's musings are tantamount to 'man yells at clouds'.
As an aside, the position taken by the Philadelphia Eagles - a team I love - was the wrong one. Period.
I just don't see precisely what this President has done that has earned such scorn. It's baffling.
If they cared. I mean truly cared, they'd use their own positions and request a chat with the President.
What do they have to lose?
Or are they afraid at finding out they were wrong?
I fully expect the media to spin this story negatively. They have to guard against the reality that in fact, Obama's Presidency was a failed one in such matters. Mostly because, I'm positing, he just didn't care. It wasn't politically expedient as it were.
That's why the comforting narrative the 'GOP obstructed' everything. 'Hey man! I tried but you know!'
Kim just dunked over your head, Lebron.
****
The progressive narrative since Trump's election has been dizzying to say the least. It's almost impossible to make sense of what exactly they're thinking. There doesn't seem to be rhyme or reason to their grievance. So confused and out of whack they are and so blinded by their hate for Trump and those who voted for him, they'd vote against Obamacare if he came out and supported it.
They hate war under Trump. But tolerated it under Obama. They hammer on a 'white supremacy' plot that barely survives even the most basic of scrutiny. They are willing to further fracture an already confrontational rivalry with Russia over what amounts to a DNC fabricated lie and even question the very essence of their electoral laws all because their own crook didn't get elected.
Heck, they've even unpersoned legendary liberal lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Jeffrey Toobin it is! He keeps the line.
They live in an 'alt-reality'.
So precariously obtuse is their sophistry.
****
This assumption the progressive left is somehow morally correct is, well, bunk. I read 'The Gulag Archipelago' for the first time when I was 17. I had a head start in cutting through all the bull shit Hollywood sold. The more they claimed to be the victim, the more I realized they were indeed outright pinko commies.
And still are. It takes a special kind of 'not paying attention' to not see it. It's in your damn face all the time. It also comes with smug smirks.
Look at it this way. When Antifa engages in violence and then screams they're victims are people defend themselves, that's exactly how Hollywood and the assholes in both the legacy and social media act when called out.
See here for more on the lie of McCarthyism as sold by the likes of intellectual giants as Woody Allen and George Clooney.
To continue. Take for instance, the fact time and again throughout history, Democrats were on the 'wrong side of history' (their own frivolous term) on issues pertaining, for example to the civil rights.
But given their talent for rewriting history no problem. We'll just 'rearrange' some facts in our favor and voila! Those Democrats were actually Republicans!
The majority of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights act and a majority of Democrats didn't. But the tables have reversed!
Never mind (D) Robert Byrd -and close friend to the Clintons - was Senate Majority leader until recently despite his KKK affiliation. He was really Republican at heart. Wink.
Never mind that Larry Ellison - a top ranking DNC official - claimed George Wallace was...you guessed it....Republican.
Hey Remember when JFK (what color was his party again?) didn't allow Sammy Davis Jr. to sing at The White House? A member of the Rat Pack no less!
Yet, celebrities strangely and retardedly stubbornly still think Democrats are a-okay? A party that tolerates rape culture more than the GOP ever could?
What of Bill Clinton claiming William Fulbright - an anti-semite (and don't be fooled by their switch to anti-Zionist either. It's just the same anti-Jew crap packaged differently) and segregationist - was one of his heroes?
But don't expect Wiki to help you out. Here's how they do their part to clean up the evilness of people so long as they vote 'right' and have a little 'D' next to their name:
"James William Fulbright (April 9, 1905 – February 9, 1995) was a United States Senator representing Arkansas from January 1945 until his resignation in December 1974. Fulbright is the longest serving chairman in the history of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. A Southern Democrat and a staunch multilateralist who supported the creation of the United Nations, he was also a segregationist who signed the Southern Manifesto. Fulbright opposed McCarthyism and the House Un-American Activities Committeeand later became known for his opposition to American involvement in the Vietnam War. His efforts to establish an international exchange program eventually resulted in the creation of a fellowship program which bears his name, the Fulbright Program."
Amazing stuff. Don't expect much on his racism.
And we're to suspend the reality of these facts and believe, in mid-air I might add, Trump is the racist?!
That's some magic luger.
What about California in all its inglorious progressive mendacity? The more they prog, the more they reveal themselves to be the very racists the left loves to tag everyone as.
What about the Obamas you ask? Different folks, but the same strokes if you get my drift. You think they weren't bit by the 'whitey' or 'God damn America' bug?
Come on. I've got this bridge, see?
If mental gymnastics was an Olympic sport they'd win gold every time.
Such is their knack for the unbelievable.
Men are from Mars, women from Venus and progressives from Pluto. So out there they've gone, I can't even give them a planet.
I started to notice this right around the time Stephen Harper was elected. Up until that time, the idea popular vote wasn't all that important unless it converted into seats was the norm. PM's generally won with call it 30% of the national vote. It's just how things work out given there are 2 1/2 parties plus a couple of other ones in recent years that cut into it.
So they decided to 'repurpose' how things should be viewed. So '34%' popular vote actually meant 66% didn't vote for Harper ergo he had no mandate! He had to work with the other parties (that is, give in to their demands). Of course, aside this is the historical reality of things, this bird brain bamboozle wasn't applied when dear Justin was elected. I hardly heard that more than half the country didn't vote for him. Justin doesn't have to listen to anyone because, well, HE WON A MAJORITY! Just like Harper did.
Exact same thing but not the same thing. Some are more equal than others and all that.
Remarkable stupidity to us not possessed by partisan ideology. But to them. Logic.
Some may say both sides do it. I counter no they don't. I rarely saw the conservative right drop to such depths. Conservatives tend to be, well conservative. Thoughtful. More measured. That the left claims they're emotional is just projection on their part.
Just my observation over the years.
As a person who spends his fair share of time improving his knowledge in the never ending quest for truth, let's just say I'm not a fan of Hollywood celebrities. The more I dig, the more I loathe their superficial and transparent ideological bent to the point of eliciting pity.
There is nothing more banal and useless than a celebrity pontificating and offering their views on the issues of the day. So much so, it's painfully obvious to an informed mind they have a tenuously shallow disposition. It's almost as if they read one book and presto! Expert!
And boy do the shameless ignorant bots in the media at large eat and drink it up!
It's so bizarre you have CNN's Jim Acosta lambasting Trump's meeting with Kim Kardashian as unacceptable. This from a guy who interviewed some guy named John Legend (?) who met with Obama. In fact, has there ever been a more insufferable President who did the celebrity shtick more than Obama? His presence on the late night show and ESPN circuit was ubiquitous. No one seemed to care then, right? How many hip hop stars visited the White House? These aren't exactly the 'cream' of our society given their rap - excuse the pun - sheets. Mind you, they go hand in hand with crooked politicians and sycophant 'journalists' like Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow and our dear Mr. Acosta.
And what of Kim? Here's a person whose claim to fame is she put out a sex tape and just...exists. Hey, all the power to her as people seem pulled to the Kardashian clan for some reason. Free markets and free minds as they say. Who am I to judge?
But she did manage to get Trump to listen to her on prison reform and he responded by pardoning Alice Johnson.
It's a small gesture. Perhaps a token one given the sheer amount of people who languish in prison under unfair sentences. But maybe this is the start of something bigger?
And once again, progressives are just showing their true colours if they dismiss this significant act.
Two years into his term Trump has managed more on social issues than Obama did. He's enacted tax reform. He's working on immigration reform and now prison reform. He signed a 'right to try' bill to boot.
In the process, he's showing to be much more progressive for ALL Americans than Obama ever could.
All issues past Presidents - most notably Obama - simply yapped about but did exactly jack shit. This is the part where fans of Obama scream, 'but he tired! GOP obstructionism! He was waiting to make deals!"
Yeah-k I say. Can it be he never was really into those things?
Anti-Trump Rhetoric |
An interesting aspect to all this is Kardashian requested a meeting with the President to plead her case. She used her popularity and leveraged it to get into the Oval Office for what I think is an important issue.
Rather than partake in counter-productive marches and engage in pointless screeds against the President, she worked with him.
And this exposes the shallowness of Lebron James, NFL players and other 'woke' virtue signallers.
While they chirp and squawk from the comforts of their privileged status, Kim actually did something concrete. Steve Kerr's musings are tantamount to 'man yells at clouds'.
As an aside, the position taken by the Philadelphia Eagles - a team I love - was the wrong one. Period.
I just don't see precisely what this President has done that has earned such scorn. It's baffling.
If they cared. I mean truly cared, they'd use their own positions and request a chat with the President.
What do they have to lose?
Or are they afraid at finding out they were wrong?
I fully expect the media to spin this story negatively. They have to guard against the reality that in fact, Obama's Presidency was a failed one in such matters. Mostly because, I'm positing, he just didn't care. It wasn't politically expedient as it were.
That's why the comforting narrative the 'GOP obstructed' everything. 'Hey man! I tried but you know!'
Kim just dunked over your head, Lebron.
****
The progressive narrative since Trump's election has been dizzying to say the least. It's almost impossible to make sense of what exactly they're thinking. There doesn't seem to be rhyme or reason to their grievance. So confused and out of whack they are and so blinded by their hate for Trump and those who voted for him, they'd vote against Obamacare if he came out and supported it.
They hate war under Trump. But tolerated it under Obama. They hammer on a 'white supremacy' plot that barely survives even the most basic of scrutiny. They are willing to further fracture an already confrontational rivalry with Russia over what amounts to a DNC fabricated lie and even question the very essence of their electoral laws all because their own crook didn't get elected.
Heck, they've even unpersoned legendary liberal lawyer Alan Dershowitz. Jeffrey Toobin it is! He keeps the line.
They live in an 'alt-reality'.
So precariously obtuse is their sophistry.
****
This assumption the progressive left is somehow morally correct is, well, bunk. I read 'The Gulag Archipelago' for the first time when I was 17. I had a head start in cutting through all the bull shit Hollywood sold. The more they claimed to be the victim, the more I realized they were indeed outright pinko commies.
And still are. It takes a special kind of 'not paying attention' to not see it. It's in your damn face all the time. It also comes with smug smirks.
Look at it this way. When Antifa engages in violence and then screams they're victims are people defend themselves, that's exactly how Hollywood and the assholes in both the legacy and social media act when called out.
See here for more on the lie of McCarthyism as sold by the likes of intellectual giants as Woody Allen and George Clooney.
To continue. Take for instance, the fact time and again throughout history, Democrats were on the 'wrong side of history' (their own frivolous term) on issues pertaining, for example to the civil rights.
But given their talent for rewriting history no problem. We'll just 'rearrange' some facts in our favor and voila! Those Democrats were actually Republicans!
The majority of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights act and a majority of Democrats didn't. But the tables have reversed!
Never mind (D) Robert Byrd -and close friend to the Clintons - was Senate Majority leader until recently despite his KKK affiliation. He was really Republican at heart. Wink.
Never mind that Larry Ellison - a top ranking DNC official - claimed George Wallace was...you guessed it....Republican.
Hey Remember when JFK (what color was his party again?) didn't allow Sammy Davis Jr. to sing at The White House? A member of the Rat Pack no less!
Yet, celebrities strangely and retardedly stubbornly still think Democrats are a-okay? A party that tolerates rape culture more than the GOP ever could?
What of Bill Clinton claiming William Fulbright - an anti-semite (and don't be fooled by their switch to anti-Zionist either. It's just the same anti-Jew crap packaged differently) and segregationist - was one of his heroes?
But don't expect Wiki to help you out. Here's how they do their part to clean up the evilness of people so long as they vote 'right' and have a little 'D' next to their name:
"James William Fulbright (April 9, 1905 – February 9, 1995) was a United States Senator representing Arkansas from January 1945 until his resignation in December 1974. Fulbright is the longest serving chairman in the history of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. A Southern Democrat and a staunch multilateralist who supported the creation of the United Nations, he was also a segregationist who signed the Southern Manifesto. Fulbright opposed McCarthyism and the House Un-American Activities Committeeand later became known for his opposition to American involvement in the Vietnam War. His efforts to establish an international exchange program eventually resulted in the creation of a fellowship program which bears his name, the Fulbright Program."
Amazing stuff. Don't expect much on his racism.
And we're to suspend the reality of these facts and believe, in mid-air I might add, Trump is the racist?!
That's some magic luger.
What about California in all its inglorious progressive mendacity? The more they prog, the more they reveal themselves to be the very racists the left loves to tag everyone as.
What about the Obamas you ask? Different folks, but the same strokes if you get my drift. You think they weren't bit by the 'whitey' or 'God damn America' bug?
Come on. I've got this bridge, see?
If mental gymnastics was an Olympic sport they'd win gold every time.
Such is their knack for the unbelievable.
Men are from Mars, women from Venus and progressives from Pluto. So out there they've gone, I can't even give them a planet.
I started to notice this right around the time Stephen Harper was elected. Up until that time, the idea popular vote wasn't all that important unless it converted into seats was the norm. PM's generally won with call it 30% of the national vote. It's just how things work out given there are 2 1/2 parties plus a couple of other ones in recent years that cut into it.
So they decided to 'repurpose' how things should be viewed. So '34%' popular vote actually meant 66% didn't vote for Harper ergo he had no mandate! He had to work with the other parties (that is, give in to their demands). Of course, aside this is the historical reality of things, this bird brain bamboozle wasn't applied when dear Justin was elected. I hardly heard that more than half the country didn't vote for him. Justin doesn't have to listen to anyone because, well, HE WON A MAJORITY! Just like Harper did.
Exact same thing but not the same thing. Some are more equal than others and all that.
Remarkable stupidity to us not possessed by partisan ideology. But to them. Logic.
Some may say both sides do it. I counter no they don't. I rarely saw the conservative right drop to such depths. Conservatives tend to be, well conservative. Thoughtful. More measured. That the left claims they're emotional is just projection on their part.
Just my observation over the years.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.