Mark Steyn:
"...CGI is not a creative free spirit from Jersey City with an impressive
mastery of Twitter, but a Canadian corporate behemoth. Indeed, CGI is
so Canadian their name is French: Conseillers en Gestion et
Informatique. Their most famous government project was for the Canadian
Firearms Registry. The registry was estimated to cost in total $119
million, which would be offset by $117 million in fees. That’s a net
cost of $2 million. Instead, by 2004 the CBC (Canada’s PBS) was
reporting costs of some $2 billion — or a thousand times more expensive.
Yeah,
yeah, I know, we’ve all had bathroom remodelers like that. But in this
case the database had to register some 7 million long guns belonging to
some two-and-a-half to three million Canadians. That works out to almost
$300 per gun — or somewhat higher than the original estimate for
processing a firearm registration of $4.60. Of those $300 gun
registrations, Canada’s auditor general reported to parliament that much
of the information was either duplicated or wrong in respect to basic
information such as names and addresses.
Sound familiar?
Also, there was a 1-800 number, but it wasn’t any use.
Sound familiar?
So it was decided that the sclerotic database needed to be improved.
Sound familiar?
But it proved impossible to “improve” CFIS (the Canadian Firearms
Information System). So CGI was hired to create an entirely new CFIS II,
which would operate alongside CFIS I until the old system could be
scrapped. CFIS II was supposed to go operational on January 9, 2003, but
the January date got postponed to June, and 2003 to 2004, and $81
million was thrown at it before a new Conservative government scrapped
the fiasco in 2007. Last year, the government of Ontario canceled
another CGI registry that never saw the light of day — just for one
disease, diabetes, and costing a mere $46 million...."
"...Was the government of the United States aware that CGI had been fired by
the government of Canada and the government of Ontario (and the
government of New Brunswick)? Nobody’s saying. But I doubt it would make
much difference. Asked by Mother Jones to explain why Obama
the candidate uses the Internet so effectively but Obama the government
is a bust, his 2008 tech maestro Clay Johnson put it this way: “The
first person that you need in order to start a Web company would be a
Web developer; the first person you need to start a
government-contracting firm is an attorney.” The problem with Obamacare
isn’t the website design, it’s the nature of government procurement in
an unaccountable bureaucracy serving 300 million people...."
And then there's good old fashioned cronyism that's said to have been involved. But we'll save that for another time.
CGI. The new Haliburton.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.