Massachusetts is so addicted to Democrat governance it makes me wonder about their state of mind. They're like a bunch of zombies. That's one thing Quebec has on Massachusetts. We're capable of mixing things up by electing different parties. We're able to swing between federal and provincial parties.
It is a cruel twist of irony that many of the world's great institutions of higher education operate in that state because judging by how blindly in bed that state is with an utterly corroded, meek, and corrupt Democrat machine infested with politicians of questionable character critical thinking isn't much their strength.
Right. Gomez was a tea-bagging, equity investor. Evil. Gotcha. Markey's hit negative campaign hit job was a-okay to people. Right.
Gomez is about as moderate a Republican as they come just like Scott Brown inexplicably fired by the people of the Commonwealth. They're what we call RINO's and yet the people still can't seem to break their partisanship and loyalty to the one-party dictatorship.
If this (from the Boston Globe comments) is any indication of what passes as a Democrat voter in that state, God help them.
"I will not vote for a republican until (1) republicans enter the world of reality and admit global climate change is a huge problem we must start making a plan of action to make sure the human race can exist in 300 years (2) republicans stop this attack on women's freedoms. Get off your obession with forcing women to maintain pregnancies and birth babies against their will (3) get off your obession with stopping women from receiving reproductive healthcare and birth control (4) get off your obession that jesus will fix everything, and realize you need to use your BRAIN and investment in science to find new energy solutions, medical solutions (banning embyronic research for cancers and diseases...really????) and that (5) we MUST fund education and we MUST get more Americans educated so we can have less poverty and (6) raise the taxes on the ubber rich, seriously...and finally (7) less guns. back ground checks, less legal guns being readily available, limits on how much stockpiling of weapons a person can do, and registry for guns so ,yes, we know, who has an arsenal in thier house and a registry so when a gun is used in a crime, we know who to blame, who was supposed to have that gun ,and why did they either lose it, or sell it to someone who didn't go through a background check. yeah..until then...dont bet on a MANY of us for even thinking for a minute or voting republican."
Ah.
In this mess, I couldn't but chuckle at the "can exist in 300 years" part. How he arrived at that figure is a marvel to behold. Why not 20, 30, 40 years? Doesn't he want to see the fruits of his labor?
Ugh. Just ugh.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.