In reading the various comments on conservative, liberal/progressive/socialist, libertarian as well as those that believe to be political neutral or independent (libertarians are probably most free-thinking and consistent people) websites, a thought came to my mind.
Wouldn't it be interesting (for fun of course) to know the credit score and history of each side?
Something tells me the average commenter at Huffington, Kos or Democratic Underground have terrible credit - if any. How else to explain their attachment and cultist commitment to the state when it comes to money? They can't manage their own money so pass it off to a bureaucrat! That's how I interpret it, anyway.
Whereas, National Review probably has a community with strong credit history. Libertarians are too diverse a group to label but I'm guessing they fall in the responsible bracket when it comes to money. This group extols the virtues of having more money in your pocket as opposed to in the hands of mere mortals in the government so ripe for corruption.
Wouldn't it be interesting (for fun of course) to know the credit score and history of each side?
Something tells me the average commenter at Huffington, Kos or Democratic Underground have terrible credit - if any. How else to explain their attachment and cultist commitment to the state when it comes to money? They can't manage their own money so pass it off to a bureaucrat! That's how I interpret it, anyway.
Whereas, National Review probably has a community with strong credit history. Libertarians are too diverse a group to label but I'm guessing they fall in the responsible bracket when it comes to money. This group extols the virtues of having more money in your pocket as opposed to in the hands of mere mortals in the government so ripe for corruption.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.