Why?

Are we talking more about children than the elderly who are in most danger to this virus? And why are focused on the children who are in less danger by several orders of magnitude than the elderly and unhealthy being forced into a vaccine? And why are we spending so much time acting as if the vaccine is a panacea and not on treatments?

Should the narrative calculus not be: A series of strategies complementing each other should be employed. Encourage diet and exercise. Treatments and vaccines. Vaccines and natural immunity will help get to herd immunity. 80% vaccinated targets are likely to fall flat and not be necessary if this multi-pronged attack is employed. 

They want 80% (and they will move those goal posts) because they believe it's the only solution.

This is where we're making an error.

And there will be unintended consequences.