We urgently need this in Canada.
Germany mandated masks in May when cases were low. In June, the country witnessed mass demonstrations but cases or infections didn't increase.
Yet they mandates remain in place.
There's no justification for it.
Germany mandated masks in May when cases were low. In June, the country witnessed mass demonstrations but cases or infections didn't increase.
Yet they mandates remain in place.
There's no justification for it.
UPDATE: Of course the punks running social media acting like PUBLISHERS banned this video.
*****
Vittorio Sgarbi: "Il n'y a pas eu 25,000 morts du coronavirus en Italie. 96.3% sont morts de d'autres pathologies"
This is probably the biggest scandal of them all. The counting of people with co-morbidities as Covid-19 is inflating the numbers.
This is probably the case in the United States as well and Canada.
Deaths are the key driver that permits a person to tolerate a mask order.
What's going on?
*****
Hopefully, like the petition removed from Change.org that was - I think that was a huge blow for us because it could have helped to really begin a huge push back. Change.org could have lived up to their name instead choosing to side with government lawlessness. Just another hypocritical now - gathering steam hopefully that momentum is still there and the people rise up.
Lawyers are already on it.
Feels a bit like in a shot in the dark but we gotta try.
*****
Vittorio Sgarbi: "Il n'y a pas eu 25,000 morts du coronavirus en Italie. 96.3% sont morts de d'autres pathologies"
This is probably the biggest scandal of them all. The counting of people with co-morbidities as Covid-19 is inflating the numbers.
This is probably the case in the United States as well and Canada.
Deaths are the key driver that permits a person to tolerate a mask order.
What's going on?
*****
Hopefully, like the petition removed from Change.org that was - I think that was a huge blow for us because it could have helped to really begin a huge push back. Change.org could have lived up to their name instead choosing to side with government lawlessness. Just another hypocritical now - gathering steam hopefully that momentum is still there and the people rise up.
Lawyers are already on it.
Feels a bit like in a shot in the dark but we gotta try.
I feel the government indirectly imprisoned me in my home with this Royal decree. I don't wear a mask because the science simply doesn't support it. I don't think trading my civil liberties for something that 'may' work isn't a good trade off. As far as I'm concerned, the government is already in deficit for dereliction of duty for the enormous unintended consequences unleashed not just here in Quebec but across Western civilization: Suicides, bankruptcies, denial of right to earn a living, creating a society dependent on welfare, weakening the mental health of citizens including depression and Stockholm Syndrome, rise in unemployment, denial of people getting other medical treatments, domestic abuse, the psychological terror on child and the regression it may have caused in their development including those with mental disabilities etc.
It is an unconscionable affront to the civil order. This is just a precautionary principle misapplied is all it is. The science of asymptomatic people ‘kill’ is not firmly established. Aren’t we all asymptomatic of something?
It also doesn't jive with the numbers. The cases are manageable. What is the reason for this? M. Legault has only said the virus will be around for a long time and that habits must change intimating we must get used to it. This is an order from ONE man and must be rejected immediately and forcefully. People may not see the bigger here. There's no basis in mandating face coverings. There are plenty of experts from around the world who warn against unleashing another round of unintended consequences as people are lulled into a false sense of security. Dr. Arruda correctly explained this and it's of concern as to why he changed his mind because the data on masks has not changed. Their effectives are determined to be inconclusive.
In the United States, these orders would likely not pass the Supreme Court. State supreme courts have already deemed the lockdowns unconstitutional.
In Canada, we have a somewhat remedial view on rights where ‘freedom ends at my offence or safety’. That’s not liberty but living in fear of tyranny. So I wish you luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.