Know what the bottom line is in all this?
A bunch of incompetent, know-nothing, good for nothing, inexperienced, low-grade nannies who didn't for one second ponder what they were embarking on did this.
"...Finally, near the end of the news conference, the president made
an interesting claim: Obamacare was really a choice driven by an
incentive for stability, not disruption. "We chose a path that was
the least disruptive," he said. Though pollsters rarely measure the
importance of "stability" in American life, I think it's probably
one of the most vital factors driving hostility toward Obamacare
from independents and moderates. Everything about Obamacare
implementation has created the perception of anarchy -- the
arbitrary implementation of laws, people losing the plans they
have, the way it was passed and the problems it has caused in
Washington -- and this news conference only reinforced that
perception."
Least disruptive? The thing was a 2000 page monstrosity later filled with so many exemptions it became a hideous piece of legislation that disrupted the lives of millions.
What does "stability" mean exactly anyway?
Welcome to big government.
It blows my mind, reading comments out on the internet, how ignorant people really are about how insurance works. Yeah, we all have our issues with them but one thing we know, whatever they do is backed up by serious acturial numbers. The government tries to skew this because sometimes those figures objectively discriminate.
The comments in the link are enjoyable.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.