At this stage, it's a rustic, unrefined, loose, heterogenous conglomeration of disaffected individuals motivated by a few factors including small government, less taxes, race and religion.
Only time will tell if it has legs and whether a more an intellectually adept generation will move in or merely revert back into the two-party option.
Excerpts:
...Seventy percent of the grass-roots groups said they have not participated in any political campaigning this year. As a whole, they have no official candidate slates, have not rallied behind any particular national leader, have little money on hand, and remain ambivalent about their goals and the political process in general.
"...We're not wanting to be a third party," s...aid Matt Ney, 55, the owner of a pilates studio and a founder of the Pearland Tea Party Patriots in Pearland, Tex. "We're not wanting to endorse individual candidates ever. What we're trying to do is be activists by pushing a conservative idea..."
...There is little agreement among the leaders of various groups about what issue the tea party should be most concerned about. In fact, few saw themselves as part of a coordinated effort.
If anything tied the groups together, it was what motivated their members to participate. Virtually all said that economic concerns were a factor, and nearly as many cited a general mistrust of government. Opposition to President Barack Obama and Democratic policies was a big factor, but only slightly more so than dissatisfaction with mainstream Republican leaders...
...While the tea party groups may lack a unifying direction or vision at the moment, the results show that they are ripe for action. A remarkable 86 percent of local leaders said most of their members are new to political activity, suggesting they could be turned into a potent grass-roots force heading into the 2012 elections....
"...Some of the local group leaders may find such tactics distasteful. Fifty-seven percent said they want to operate as a network of independent entities. And many organizers said that the lack of coordination and the independence of the groups are what drew them to the movement, even if it is a liability when it comes to turning their beliefs into action...."
"...If you're an opponent of the tea party, we're not an easy target," he said. "Some of the groups want to take on prayer in school. Some of them want to take on voter education. Some want to be endorsing candidates. But there is no particular person, at least in the state of Ohio, who is the president of the tea party; it just doesn't exist. That's a disadvantage for us because we can't move quickly on things. We can't always agree...."
"...The tea party has been accused of racism by its political opponents, after comments from some prominent members and signs at several major rallies this year that attacked Obama for either his race or the false belief that he is a Muslim. At rallies, for instances, organizers have kicked out questionable members and have sought to project a more tolerant image.
But the interviews found that Obama's race is, in fact, important in more than one in 10 tea party groups.
Andy Stevens, 68, a video producer and a founder of the Tea Party Patriots in Anacortes, Wash., said he described Obama's race and and religion as "somewhat important" to members of his group because they remain troubled by what they see as the president's un-American and un-Christian behaviors.
In Stevens's view, those include Obama's "socialist" policies and intentional failure to mention "the creator" when talking about inalienable rights..."
1 in 10 Tea Party groups are racist? That sounds accurate.
ReplyDeleteThere may never be any organization on a large scale, because the Tea Party isn't a legitimately independent political movement. It's largely an artificial construct of Fox News and Republican interest groups. If it was true a grassroots organization, it would grow, but it's astroturf. It's a marketting campaign for getting Republicans back in office.
It's a shame, because there is an independent political party in the US which syncs up relatively well with these people's views, with two major exceptions. Libertarians are almost indistringuishable from Tea Partiers. The major differences are that Libertarians publicly disavow racists (there are undoubtedly some racist Libertarians, but it's not part of their platform) and Libertarians oppose militarism. Tea Partiers love the idea of blowing billions of dollars on blowing up hundreds of thousands of Muslims.
Sounds right to me.
ReplyDeleteNeocons in sheep's clothing?