The Congressional Black Caucus is asking for a police czar position be created. Like the other czar posts have been such a smashing success. But hey, statists are gonna statist even if their race hustlers or opportunists.
It's interesting the CBC (funny writing that) is asking for one now over one shooting while have never done so regarding, say, Chicago and the problem of black on black crime.
No. White on black crime is the evil in their back yard.
Sharpton, Jackson and all who pounce like jackals on such events before facts are collected to further an agenda...well...
The Eighth Circle of Hell await.
****
But the Washington Posts seems to have arrived at a similar conclusion as the CBC.
There's no sugar coating it, America needs more top men.
****
And they need a President who ignores Congress as he plans to do with climate change. That's still an issues?
Because the GOP are obstructionist 'savages' as one NYT commenter put it. Not that he's gonna do squat. He's the weak man of Western countries at the moment. His only option is to, as a Constitutional lecturer, ignore the law and scream, 'but they won't help me!"
It's STRATEGY!
The NYT and its commenters are officially (according to me) on par with Huffington and Salon.
That is, shitty.
Reason.com rules and squashes their communities and sends the rest home like whiny little derps - without a trigger warning.
It's interesting the CBC (funny writing that) is asking for one now over one shooting while have never done so regarding, say, Chicago and the problem of black on black crime.
No. White on black crime is the evil in their back yard.
Sharpton, Jackson and all who pounce like jackals on such events before facts are collected to further an agenda...well...
The Eighth Circle of Hell await.
****
But the Washington Posts seems to have arrived at a similar conclusion as the CBC.
There's no sugar coating it, America needs more top men.
****
And they need a President who ignores Congress as he plans to do with climate change. That's still an issues?
Because the GOP are obstructionist 'savages' as one NYT commenter put it. Not that he's gonna do squat. He's the weak man of Western countries at the moment. His only option is to, as a Constitutional lecturer, ignore the law and scream, 'but they won't help me!"
It's STRATEGY!
The NYT and its commenters are officially (according to me) on par with Huffington and Salon.
That is, shitty.
Reason.com rules and squashes their communities and sends the rest home like whiny little derps - without a trigger warning.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.