From Britannica:
talion, Latin lex talionis, principle developed in early Babylonian law and present in both biblical and early Roman
law that criminals should receive as punishment precisely those
injuries and damages they had inflicted upon their victims. Many early
societies applied this “eye-for-an-eye” principle literally.
In ancient Palestine, injury and bodily mutilation, as well as
theft, were considered private wrongs. As such, the matter was settled
not by the state but between the person who inflicted the injury and the
one injured, an attitude that also prevailed in early Rome. Talion was
the ultimate satisfaction a plaintiff might demand but was not
mandatory; the injured person could obtain satisfaction with money if he
wished.
On the principle that two different persons could not have exactly
the same bodily members, the Palestinian sages enacted a law by which
the injured party could not demand an eye from the person who caused the
loss of his eye but could demand the value of his eye. This led to the
abolition of talion in Palestine. By the 5th century bc in Rome, fines known as delicts
had begun to replace talion in many instances, though the concept of
talion did reemerge in medieval Germany and in some areas of Scandinavia
in the 17th and 18th centuries.
Until the end of the 18th century, talion provided the rationale for such corporal punishments as flogging,
branding, mutilation, the stock, and the pillory. The principle still
serves as a partial basis for punishments or the assessment of fines
against minor offenders in some legal systems where customary law is
recognized.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.