Saturday I participate in a half-marathon in Vermont. Naturally, the weather is going to sink. Rain, slush, cold.
My goal was to run it inside 1 hour and 45 minutes but with the weather that might prove a challenge. I don't know. I've been running at 1 hour 36-39 minutes in training though.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to run for six days choosing instead to rest my calf. In fact, I simply want to avoid injuries and did have to deal with a migraine for a couple of days. I'm vulnerable to vertigo so health realities did have an impact in my deciding to load up on carbs and rest the week.
I know it's kinda up to the runner whether training up until race day or taking days off is beneficial. If I had my way, I would have run maybe two more times but I doubt it would have made a difference on my time at this point.
I managed 44 runs since January 1. I aimed to run 50 times but again, was sidetracked with an illness for 10 days back in February and was in New York for three days in March. Nor was I strict with my diet along the way. I still enjoyed my wine and espresso.
A friend of mine from Boston (now living here and regretting it as he watches the PQ act like complete buffoons. Funny. He's a well informed, intelligent liberal and up until recently saw Quebec's language laws and issues as but a mere nuisance. He felt it Montreal was still a good place to be. Alas, he's come to adjust his thinking a little in lieu of all that's gone on. Not exactly a raw-raw-raw American, even he concedes nothing like what Quebec does happens in the States, "Quebec is more fucked up than the U.S. at the moment"as he summed it. Same for another American I may do business with. It's just too toxic for their taste. They can spot prejudicial politics from a mile away and that's all the PQ are about. They know their kids have no shot here...so...I digress) suggested I spit on a few lazy-ass socialist Vermonters along the path. Just an inside joke between he and I given my position on certain issues and his liberal sensibilities.
What I'm trying to say is I may not post for a couple of days.
Whatever.
2013-04-11
Rand Paul Begins The Long Hard Journey: Talking To Schools
"Howard University student to Sen. Rand Paul: "Good afternoon, Senator.
My name is Keenan Glover, I’m an administration of justice major from
Rochester, New York. A freshman, as well. You say you want to provide a
government that leaves us alone. Quite frankly, I don’t want that. I
want a government that is going to help me. I want a government that is
going to help me fund my college education. I want a government that
won’t define me by my FAFSA or by my family’s income. I’m a dollar sign
with a heartbeat in this nation. This society is a mirror image of
Capitol Hill. Do you, Senator Rand Paul, have a solution to come up with
new American values so that the citizens of this nation have a worth of
more than dead presidents and Ben Franklin?"
Rand Paul is hitting the College trail. This is exactly what he needs to do. First up, Howard University.
It's the only way to challenge all the myths, lies and misunderstandings of the libertarian position. For example, smaller government doesn't mean you want people to starve. Rather, it asks for a shifting of values with a strong focus on the role of individuals in the process.
Paul did a good job.
As you can tell from the above quote, some people can't be helped or dissuaded. It's actually pitiful the extent moochery has reached. All you need to know about what the Keenan Glovers of the world can lead to just look at Quebec's student protests.
Hey, kid. Bend over. There. That's how the government wipes your ass. Hurts eh?
The last sentence is anti-history. It's one of those "look at how smart I am" snark remarks that has no real intellectual merit.
Nice discussion about this, as usual, at Reason. Best comments community on the net!
Rand Paul is hitting the College trail. This is exactly what he needs to do. First up, Howard University.
It's the only way to challenge all the myths, lies and misunderstandings of the libertarian position. For example, smaller government doesn't mean you want people to starve. Rather, it asks for a shifting of values with a strong focus on the role of individuals in the process.
Paul did a good job.
As you can tell from the above quote, some people can't be helped or dissuaded. It's actually pitiful the extent moochery has reached. All you need to know about what the Keenan Glovers of the world can lead to just look at Quebec's student protests.
Hey, kid. Bend over. There. That's how the government wipes your ass. Hurts eh?
The last sentence is anti-history. It's one of those "look at how smart I am" snark remarks that has no real intellectual merit.
Nice discussion about this, as usual, at Reason. Best comments community on the net!
Practice Can Help Reach Perfection
I was thinking about practice for some reason earlier.
Here's the thing. Practice matters.
It matters more than you or people like Allen Iverson (see famous practice rant here) can or could ever imagine. Maybe it explains in part Iverson was never part of a championship team or really matured as a pro athlete.
ALL champions play hard during games. And every single champion has one common defining feature and characteristic they ALL share. The took practice seriously.
Mike Bossy went to my high school long before I attended but it was well known he spent hours upon hours shooting the puck at the rink before, after and probably during school hours. Bossy of course is now regarded to be the "purist" goal scorer in NHL history. Not a bad tag considering the likes of Maurice Richard, Gordie Howe, Bobby and Brett Hull, Mario Lemieux and of course Wayne Gretzky. 99 was all about practice. He was the greatest player ever and was the first one on the ice, last one off.
There are cases like this in all major sports. In Iverson's own sport Kobe Bryant treats practice as if it's a game. How many titles does Bryant?
Iverson was an awesome player. So good that he made one of USA's legendary Dream Teams at the Olympics.
But he wasn't into practice. Too bad.
It's not just in sports. Musicians and writers, for example, spend hours upon hours practicing.
Practice is a way to avoid mistakes through repetition. It's tedious but true geniuses take it seriously.
Here's the thing. Practice matters.
It matters more than you or people like Allen Iverson (see famous practice rant here) can or could ever imagine. Maybe it explains in part Iverson was never part of a championship team or really matured as a pro athlete.
ALL champions play hard during games. And every single champion has one common defining feature and characteristic they ALL share. The took practice seriously.
Mike Bossy went to my high school long before I attended but it was well known he spent hours upon hours shooting the puck at the rink before, after and probably during school hours. Bossy of course is now regarded to be the "purist" goal scorer in NHL history. Not a bad tag considering the likes of Maurice Richard, Gordie Howe, Bobby and Brett Hull, Mario Lemieux and of course Wayne Gretzky. 99 was all about practice. He was the greatest player ever and was the first one on the ice, last one off.
There are cases like this in all major sports. In Iverson's own sport Kobe Bryant treats practice as if it's a game. How many titles does Bryant?
Iverson was an awesome player. So good that he made one of USA's legendary Dream Teams at the Olympics.
But he wasn't into practice. Too bad.
It's not just in sports. Musicians and writers, for example, spend hours upon hours practicing.
Practice is a way to avoid mistakes through repetition. It's tedious but true geniuses take it seriously.
Rebranding The NDP
The NEW New Democratish Party: Socialism. This time it'll be different!
"That the party brass is taking another shot at changing the constitution comes as no surprise to any New Democrat. This is, at least, the third consecutive convention where we’ve seen similar attempts from the top. At the 2009 Halifax convention, there was suggestion that the “New” in the NDP’s name might be dropped so that we’d become the “Democratic Party.” Together with the presence of many Obama strategists at that convention, it suggested a rightward shift that would turn the NDP into a party of the centre like the American Democrats. The opposition to any such move was so great that it was not even proposed"
Say wha? Democrats? Centrists?
Man, even Obama supporters in the media have toned down somewhat the myth he's a pragmatic centrist.
It is interesting to note Obama strategists were at an NDP convention. And the President doesn't lean left. Sure. Right. Gotcha.
I know to those on the "real" left don't consider Obama to be socialist - Obamacare is seen as a gift to insurance companies and may shoot premiums up for most people - and to that they may have a point, but he ain't no centrist.
He's liberal. End of story. Nothing wrong with that. He was democratically elected.
As for the NDP.
Whatever.
Let them us code words like "Forward" and "Lean Forward" and "Progress." It's a signal to the rest of us to run away.
"That the party brass is taking another shot at changing the constitution comes as no surprise to any New Democrat. This is, at least, the third consecutive convention where we’ve seen similar attempts from the top. At the 2009 Halifax convention, there was suggestion that the “New” in the NDP’s name might be dropped so that we’d become the “Democratic Party.” Together with the presence of many Obama strategists at that convention, it suggested a rightward shift that would turn the NDP into a party of the centre like the American Democrats. The opposition to any such move was so great that it was not even proposed"
Say wha? Democrats? Centrists?
Man, even Obama supporters in the media have toned down somewhat the myth he's a pragmatic centrist.
It is interesting to note Obama strategists were at an NDP convention. And the President doesn't lean left. Sure. Right. Gotcha.
I know to those on the "real" left don't consider Obama to be socialist - Obamacare is seen as a gift to insurance companies and may shoot premiums up for most people - and to that they may have a point, but he ain't no centrist.
He's liberal. End of story. Nothing wrong with that. He was democratically elected.
As for the NDP.
Whatever.
Let them us code words like "Forward" and "Lean Forward" and "Progress." It's a signal to the rest of us to run away.
Murderer Profs At NYU
To the left, the Weather Underground are heroes.
In any event, what's the big deal when you can erect strawman logic. For example, as one of the commenters at Daily Beast argue, it goes something like this:
"Yeah, but what about Bush!"
They trip all over themselves with nonsense about the 'right-wing.' One guy was babbling on trying to connect gun-control to the story as if they're related.
Focus on the ACTION. Anyway, it's a tactic I deal with a work all the time. I have to remind my young workers of the errors of this logic. It can mess them up. Don't argue like a 'salam.'
It is intended to distract from the point that NYU hired a murderer to teach at their school. Now, one can debate if the person paid their debt to society and according to the law they did. However, it is quite a "louche" (weak) move on the part of NYU.
The last thing I need is my kid listening to losers; especially considering tuition.
Here in Quebec, same thing. FLQ terrorist-killers (ooops, freedom fighters) get all sorts of passes and apologists.
Liberals hate hypocrisy; unless they engage in it then it's all cool.
As a side personal comment, I think they'd go absolutely bat-shit unhinged crazy if, say, Sarah Palin was offered a job at a school.
In any event, what's the big deal when you can erect strawman logic. For example, as one of the commenters at Daily Beast argue, it goes something like this:
"Yeah, but what about Bush!"
They trip all over themselves with nonsense about the 'right-wing.' One guy was babbling on trying to connect gun-control to the story as if they're related.
Focus on the ACTION. Anyway, it's a tactic I deal with a work all the time. I have to remind my young workers of the errors of this logic. It can mess them up. Don't argue like a 'salam.'
It is intended to distract from the point that NYU hired a murderer to teach at their school. Now, one can debate if the person paid their debt to society and according to the law they did. However, it is quite a "louche" (weak) move on the part of NYU.
The last thing I need is my kid listening to losers; especially considering tuition.
Here in Quebec, same thing. FLQ terrorist-killers (ooops, freedom fighters) get all sorts of passes and apologists.
Liberals hate hypocrisy; unless they engage in it then it's all cool.
As a side personal comment, I think they'd go absolutely bat-shit unhinged crazy if, say, Sarah Palin was offered a job at a school.
2013-04-10
(Stupid) Quote Of The Day
"Freedom of speech is an American concept, so I don't give it any value... It's not my job to give value to an American concept."
Dafuck?
And here I thought it was a basic HUMAN right. But in parochial, little Canada it's an 'American value.' Fuck me.
Dean Steacey. He gets permanent "Arrogant-Smug-Puke" status here at T.C.
The result, in Canada, speaks for itself doesn't it? In that one little sentence, he exposes the failure of the smug Canadian mentality when it comes to notions of civil liberties.
We're not as committed to "freedom of speech" as we claim. We play bull shit games seeking "a balance." You can't "balance" freedom, Canada. You either have or you don't.
Quebec is currently unhinged. The CHRC is lawless. And Canada is meek.
I weep for this land sometimes.
Dafuck?
And here I thought it was a basic HUMAN right. But in parochial, little Canada it's an 'American value.' Fuck me.
Dean Steacey. He gets permanent "Arrogant-Smug-Puke" status here at T.C.
The result, in Canada, speaks for itself doesn't it? In that one little sentence, he exposes the failure of the smug Canadian mentality when it comes to notions of civil liberties.
We're not as committed to "freedom of speech" as we claim. We play bull shit games seeking "a balance." You can't "balance" freedom, Canada. You either have or you don't.
Quebec is currently unhinged. The CHRC is lawless. And Canada is meek.
I weep for this land sometimes.
Life Lesson Of The Day
In my time running a business one thing I learned:
Life, a good deal of it anyway, is all about flushing out the truth.
Life, a good deal of it anyway, is all about flushing out the truth.
Quebec's New Motto
Q:"A democracy or republic?"
A: "A (banana) republic if you can keep it!"
It's just a suggestion.
A: "A (banana) republic if you can keep it!"
It's just a suggestion.
Quote Of The Day
"I had a dream last night and it was all in english....When I woke the language police told me I was in default."
By way of a smart-alec buddy.
By way of a smart-alec buddy.
Quebec's Real Enemy: Quebec
I'd like to address something here. It's directed at intelligent, mild-mannered Quebecers; not nationalists. Nationalists of all stripes can go suck an elk's scrotum.
The issue, it must be repeated and can't be so enough, is not whether Quebec has the right or duty to protect its language.
What's not sinking in the head of people and what is completely unacceptable in a free, pluralist society is the use of PUNITIVE measures to protect one culture at the expense of another.
I don't know what sort of mind can think or deem it appropriate that it's appropriate to fine a person for what amounts to freedom of expression. You must speak this and write this 30% larger etc. It's insidious, infantile and without decorum or respect. Small minded behavior from a small population demands, well, small minded treatment.
Quebec is declaring a war on language, yes, but it's also a war on freedom of expression it must understand. A war on itself.
French-Quebec nationalists object to be called small-minded and xenophobic but that's what they are. Change the idiot mentality and perhaps big people will take them seriously.
I read often language intolerance takes place in Canada - and for shame. It boggles my mind how petty we can be. I object to it and reject it outright. I stand for equal rights for ALL.
However, Quebec has taken it a step further. A step no jurisdiction has taken.
Now. Other places can look to here and say, "well, tit for tat" or "well, we're not going that route." So far, the latter is fortunately prevailing.
Infuriating in all this is I have to watch Quebec legislate laws that effectively create two-tiers of classes of citizens and must keep quiet about it.
On that front a big "fuck you" to all Quebecois dimwits who think this.
I'm currently reading a book about Rome. In it, it discusses how the majstic artist Raphael and the Renaissance thinker Baldassare Castiglione rummaged through the ruins of Ancient Rome in search of classical ideas and art like a couple of scavengers.
They wrote a report (well, it's strongly assumed Castiglione was a part of the writing), about Rome's decline. In it, and among other things, they argued it wasn't the Goths or Vandals or other invading tribes that ruined Rome.
It was the Romans themselves in all their decadence that did it.
And so it is in Quebec. It's not English or 'les autres' the enemy. They're just the strawman to a larger problem. It's the Quebecers themselves who threaten Quebec as they see it. How else to describe their behavior?
It seems others have to pay for their shortcomings and weaknesses.
The issue, it must be repeated and can't be so enough, is not whether Quebec has the right or duty to protect its language.
What's not sinking in the head of people and what is completely unacceptable in a free, pluralist society is the use of PUNITIVE measures to protect one culture at the expense of another.
I don't know what sort of mind can think or deem it appropriate that it's appropriate to fine a person for what amounts to freedom of expression. You must speak this and write this 30% larger etc. It's insidious, infantile and without decorum or respect. Small minded behavior from a small population demands, well, small minded treatment.
Quebec is declaring a war on language, yes, but it's also a war on freedom of expression it must understand. A war on itself.
French-Quebec nationalists object to be called small-minded and xenophobic but that's what they are. Change the idiot mentality and perhaps big people will take them seriously.
I read often language intolerance takes place in Canada - and for shame. It boggles my mind how petty we can be. I object to it and reject it outright. I stand for equal rights for ALL.
However, Quebec has taken it a step further. A step no jurisdiction has taken.
Now. Other places can look to here and say, "well, tit for tat" or "well, we're not going that route." So far, the latter is fortunately prevailing.
Infuriating in all this is I have to watch Quebec legislate laws that effectively create two-tiers of classes of citizens and must keep quiet about it.
On that front a big "fuck you" to all Quebecois dimwits who think this.
I'm currently reading a book about Rome. In it, it discusses how the majstic artist Raphael and the Renaissance thinker Baldassare Castiglione rummaged through the ruins of Ancient Rome in search of classical ideas and art like a couple of scavengers.
They wrote a report (well, it's strongly assumed Castiglione was a part of the writing), about Rome's decline. In it, and among other things, they argued it wasn't the Goths or Vandals or other invading tribes that ruined Rome.
It was the Romans themselves in all their decadence that did it.
And so it is in Quebec. It's not English or 'les autres' the enemy. They're just the strawman to a larger problem. It's the Quebecers themselves who threaten Quebec as they see it. How else to describe their behavior?
It seems others have to pay for their shortcomings and weaknesses.
2013-04-09
Time Magazine Weighs In On Quebec
I'm just glad the world is covering it.
Bill 14 is a travesty of a bill and the CAQ are a fucking disgrace for not shutting it down.
Time, The Economist and 14 other countries have now exposed the insanity of Quebec's language laws.
Quebec can fool itself but it ain't fooling the world.
Hilarious reading the hicks like Josee Legault write in French on an American publication. The usual drivel follows. I'm reading their comments and it never ceases to amaze me how far they take their xenophobic crap. Legault has always been a joke of a pundit with no great enlightened insights.
Embarrassing to soaring heights.
Like people give a shit she writes her comments in French as if to make a point. And often it's just parochial sophistry.
In other words, bull shit.
Bill 14 is a travesty of a bill and the CAQ are a fucking disgrace for not shutting it down.
Time, The Economist and 14 other countries have now exposed the insanity of Quebec's language laws.
Quebec can fool itself but it ain't fooling the world.
Hilarious reading the hicks like Josee Legault write in French on an American publication. The usual drivel follows. I'm reading their comments and it never ceases to amaze me how far they take their xenophobic crap. Legault has always been a joke of a pundit with no great enlightened insights.
Embarrassing to soaring heights.
Like people give a shit she writes her comments in French as if to make a point. And often it's just parochial sophistry.
In other words, bull shit.
When Pundits Accept Ignorance Willingly
"Thus did Jimmy Carter, in a May 2002 speech at the University of
Havana that was broadcast throughout Cuba, prostrate himself before a
regime that has jailed and tortured political prisoners at a higher rate
than Stalin and murdered (in absolute numbers) more political prisoners
in its first three years in power (out of a population of 6.4 million)
than Hitler murdered in its first six years (out of a population of 70
million.) Not to mention that President Carter’s host, Fidel Castro,
insulted his nation as “a vulture preying on humanity” and came within a
hair of nuking it.
Carter is not the only one to trumpet the supposed glories of Cuban health care. Let’s consider the following quotes:
“Health care (in Cuba) was once for the privileged few. Today it is available to every Cuban and it is free….Health and education are the revolution’s great success stories.” — Peter Jennings, World News Tonight, April 3, 1989
“Castro has brought great health care to his country” — ABC’s Barbara Walters, Oct. 11, 2002
“Even today, Cuba has one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the world.” — Katie Couric reporting on NBC’s Today, February 13, 1992
“Frankly, to be a poor child in Cuba may in many instances be better than being a poor child in Miami, and I’m not going to condemn their lifestyle so gratuitously.”– Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift on The McLaughlin Group, April 8, 2000
Idiots. Liars. All of them. No excuse. None.
Carter is not the only one to trumpet the supposed glories of Cuban health care. Let’s consider the following quotes:
“Health care (in Cuba) was once for the privileged few. Today it is available to every Cuban and it is free….Health and education are the revolution’s great success stories.” — Peter Jennings, World News Tonight, April 3, 1989
“Castro has brought great health care to his country” — ABC’s Barbara Walters, Oct. 11, 2002
“Even today, Cuba has one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the world.” — Katie Couric reporting on NBC’s Today, February 13, 1992
“Frankly, to be a poor child in Cuba may in many instances be better than being a poor child in Miami, and I’m not going to condemn their lifestyle so gratuitously.”– Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift on The McLaughlin Group, April 8, 2000
Idiots. Liars. All of them. No excuse. None.
Obama Lives On Collective Ignorance
Obama has made some specious claims and constructed a few weak arguments during his Presidency. His "oratorical" skills are predicated on a bedrock of appealss to emotions.
That's how I interpret him anyway.
I can't for the life of me figure out how anyone can assert he's a great orator. He's an average speaker with unimaginative and stale ideas.
It's a real head-scratcher. Head & Shoulders doesn't have a product for that.
“And as I understand it, the reason Kathleen made this decision was she could not be confident that a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old going into a drugstore should be able — alongside bubble gum or batteries — be able to buy a medication that potentially, if not used properly, could end up having an adverse effect. And I think most parents would probably feel the same way.”
Asked if he fully supported Ms. Sebelius, Mr. Obama said, “I do.”
Holy Martin fucking Luther. And this is not the nanny-state at work in the flesh how exactly?
Who the fuck is letting a 10 year-old near a morning pill? Where are the facts showing this? Isn't teenage pregnancy on the decline? What fucking pharmacy places that shit near batteries and bubble gum? Mackeral shit talk about micro-managing the lives of Americans.
Well, it's just "common sense" as the Obama administration sees it.
Oh, I know. There are none I bet. Just like daycare up here. The government produces a giant pain in the ass book on "codes" based on nothing more than "because we say so" logic.
Bunch of misleading political bums. Didn't the President really claim the Newtown killer used a "machine gun?" He preys on ignorance. He eats it like one devours hickory smoked ribs.
Hey, Americans voted for Obama so they must want their hands to be held.
That's how I interpret him anyway.
I can't for the life of me figure out how anyone can assert he's a great orator. He's an average speaker with unimaginative and stale ideas.
It's a real head-scratcher. Head & Shoulders doesn't have a product for that.
“And as I understand it, the reason Kathleen made this decision was she could not be confident that a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old going into a drugstore should be able — alongside bubble gum or batteries — be able to buy a medication that potentially, if not used properly, could end up having an adverse effect. And I think most parents would probably feel the same way.”
Asked if he fully supported Ms. Sebelius, Mr. Obama said, “I do.”
Holy Martin fucking Luther. And this is not the nanny-state at work in the flesh how exactly?
Who the fuck is letting a 10 year-old near a morning pill? Where are the facts showing this? Isn't teenage pregnancy on the decline? What fucking pharmacy places that shit near batteries and bubble gum? Mackeral shit talk about micro-managing the lives of Americans.
Well, it's just "common sense" as the Obama administration sees it.
Oh, I know. There are none I bet. Just like daycare up here. The government produces a giant pain in the ass book on "codes" based on nothing more than "because we say so" logic.
Bunch of misleading political bums. Didn't the President really claim the Newtown killer used a "machine gun?" He preys on ignorance. He eats it like one devours hickory smoked ribs.
Hey, Americans voted for Obama so they must want their hands to be held.
Injustice All Round
"Why should we pay and not them?"
Good question.
More about Laika bank in Cyprus in above link.
That's not the free-market at work by the way. That's cronyism enabled by the state. The greatest and most powerful enabler is the government.
***
It's amazing how something that actually impacts a community and helps people in need like Chez Soi usually gets the axe when the state wants to tighten the belt but useless, divisive organizations like the OLF who offer nothing but toxic feelings got an increase in funding. To say nothing of giving money in the form of subsidies and/or grants to bad companies or unprofitable ones.
The head spins.
Good question.
More about Laika bank in Cyprus in above link.
That's not the free-market at work by the way. That's cronyism enabled by the state. The greatest and most powerful enabler is the government.
***
It's amazing how something that actually impacts a community and helps people in need like Chez Soi usually gets the axe when the state wants to tighten the belt but useless, divisive organizations like the OLF who offer nothing but toxic feelings got an increase in funding. To say nothing of giving money in the form of subsidies and/or grants to bad companies or unprofitable ones.
The head spins.
2013-04-08
Snippets Of T.C.
T.C. with wife at dinner party. Sitting at the table is Joe 'Sad Lips' Riscal. Riscal has a crush on T.C.'s wife.
Wife: Joe graduated Magna cum laude this semester.
Todd: Oh. Shucks. It was nothing. You know what they say. It's only book smarts...
Fake dinner party laugh ensues.
T.C. chuckles.
Wife: What is it, honey?
T.C.: Cum.
Joe: Why, such a sense of vulgar humor!
T.C.: You're a nice load yourself.
Joe: I could drop one on your wife while you watch?
Wife: Todd!
Joe: I do apologize. please forgive me.
T.C.: Whatever you say...Bukkake Joe.
Joe: I've just about had enough of your school boy antics. I can't help but wonder what she sees in you!
T.C.: Loads, Joe. Loads.
(looks to another person) Hey, honey, can you pass me one of those thingies?
Woman: You mean...the napkin?
T.C.: Yeah, whatever the "napkin." Read about those in a book once.
(Places it on his head).
Wife: T.C. please.
Joe: Always the class jester, eh, T.C.?
T.C.: If called for by the students, then yes.
Joe: But this isn't school anymore my dear friend. It's life.
T.C.: Get a loadadisguy! Cum boy offers his pontificinations.
Joe: Yes.
T.C.: Ok, cum boy. If this isn't school anymore, why are we in a University eating this pretentious but bland food?
Joe: How drole!
Wife: I think I hear the phone ring, T.C.
T.C.: Not me, man.
Wife: I think I hear the phone. Could be Laurie.
T.C.: Who's Laurie? Ah. Right. Gotta run, Joe. May you shoot bullets and not blanks.
Wife keeps head down. Walks out quick paced. T.C. stops off to look at some fish in an aquarium.
T.C.: Look at all those fishes...
Wife: Joe graduated Magna cum laude this semester.
Todd: Oh. Shucks. It was nothing. You know what they say. It's only book smarts...
Fake dinner party laugh ensues.
T.C. chuckles.
Wife: What is it, honey?
T.C.: Cum.
Joe: Why, such a sense of vulgar humor!
T.C.: You're a nice load yourself.
Joe: I could drop one on your wife while you watch?
Wife: Todd!
Joe: I do apologize. please forgive me.
T.C.: Whatever you say...Bukkake Joe.
Joe: I've just about had enough of your school boy antics. I can't help but wonder what she sees in you!
T.C.: Loads, Joe. Loads.
(looks to another person) Hey, honey, can you pass me one of those thingies?
Woman: You mean...the napkin?
T.C.: Yeah, whatever the "napkin." Read about those in a book once.
(Places it on his head).
Wife: T.C. please.
Joe: Always the class jester, eh, T.C.?
T.C.: If called for by the students, then yes.
Joe: But this isn't school anymore my dear friend. It's life.
T.C.: Get a loadadisguy! Cum boy offers his pontificinations.
Joe: Yes.
T.C.: Ok, cum boy. If this isn't school anymore, why are we in a University eating this pretentious but bland food?
Joe: How drole!
Wife: I think I hear the phone ring, T.C.
T.C.: Not me, man.
Wife: I think I hear the phone. Could be Laurie.
T.C.: Who's Laurie? Ah. Right. Gotta run, Joe. May you shoot bullets and not blanks.
Wife keeps head down. Walks out quick paced. T.C. stops off to look at some fish in an aquarium.
T.C.: Look at all those fishes...
Fall Of The West Reason 364655334
MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry chimes in with this priceless bit.
Ooof. How Platonian.
My response?
Oh. They do really live among us folks. People actually do think this way. They ain't no Big Foot.
Gee. There's a lot to digest with some Pepto-Bismal but I think I'll let Mr. Garrison take over.
Shit. Just make those "hand over your children" government wards and be done with it already.
'Lean Forward' my ass.
More like 'Bend Over.'
Ooof. How Platonian.
My response?
Oh. They do really live among us folks. People actually do think this way. They ain't no Big Foot.
Gee. There's a lot to digest with some Pepto-Bismal but I think I'll let Mr. Garrison take over.
Shit. Just make those "hand over your children" government wards and be done with it already.
'Lean Forward' my ass.
More like 'Bend Over.'
Raphael's Castiglione Masterpiece
Often lost in the shuffle, I reckon, is Raphael's painting of Baldassare Castiglione - the ultimate Renaissance Man who wrote the book on how to be civilized. It arguably ranks alongside The Mona Lisa.
Raphael, of course, is one of the masters of the Renaissance, who along with Leonardo Da Vinci and Michaelangelo, was commissioned by Pope Julius II in what has to be regarded the greatest art team ever assembled. Like bringing together, I don't know, Gretzky, Jordan and Ruth or (Ali or Pele or Maradona).
Raphael, of course, is one of the masters of the Renaissance, who along with Leonardo Da Vinci and Michaelangelo, was commissioned by Pope Julius II in what has to be regarded the greatest art team ever assembled. Like bringing together, I don't know, Gretzky, Jordan and Ruth or (Ali or Pele or Maradona).
Nutella Heist In Germany
I guess they got fed up of running out of Nutella. Hate when that happens myself.
Mind you, I switched to Gioa recently. Better ingredients. Before that I usually used Gioa for the drink bitter.
Mind you, I switched to Gioa recently. Better ingredients. Before that I usually used Gioa for the drink bitter.
Thatcher Dead
Wonder how Alex P. Keaton is taking it.
A quote from the iconic political figure explaining how she governed Great Britain:
"A system of state control can't be made good merely because it is run by "clever" people who make the arrogant assertion that they "know best" and that they are serving the "public interest" interest which of course is determined by them. State control is fundamentally bad because it denies people the power to choose and the opportunity to bear responsibility for their own actions.
Conversely, privatisation shrinks the power of the state and free enterprise enlarges the power of the people."
So true. We Canadians should keep this in mind.
Alas, is the UK worse off today than when Thatcher took over back then?
***
Are feminists mourning?
***
Thatcher and Reagan. Both perhaps are over stated these days but one can't deny the power of their leadership skills and personalities. They rose and seized control of the moment. I think the overall message was correct, whether they implemented it appropriately or without contradiction is another matter. There's a significant amount of literature on their governance.
Currently, there is no Thatcher or Reagan on the North American or European landscape. For some, on the left of course, that's a good thing!
A quote from the iconic political figure explaining how she governed Great Britain:
"A system of state control can't be made good merely because it is run by "clever" people who make the arrogant assertion that they "know best" and that they are serving the "public interest" interest which of course is determined by them. State control is fundamentally bad because it denies people the power to choose and the opportunity to bear responsibility for their own actions.
Conversely, privatisation shrinks the power of the state and free enterprise enlarges the power of the people."
So true. We Canadians should keep this in mind.
Alas, is the UK worse off today than when Thatcher took over back then?
***
Are feminists mourning?
***
Thatcher and Reagan. Both perhaps are over stated these days but one can't deny the power of their leadership skills and personalities. They rose and seized control of the moment. I think the overall message was correct, whether they implemented it appropriately or without contradiction is another matter. There's a significant amount of literature on their governance.
Currently, there is no Thatcher or Reagan on the North American or European landscape. For some, on the left of course, that's a good thing!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
