We've observed things aren't exactly healthy where free speech is concerned on campuses. There have been one too many incidences and one too many professors sprouting and spewing anti-American, anti-free speech gibberish in institutions of higher learning.
Given that a startling vast majority of faculties are left-leaning Democrats (cowards among them won't admit to being Marxist so we're left to read between their lines. Literate minds can spot a Marxist-Leninist comment), it's no surprise they've undertaken as their 'duty' to undermine a sitting President.
One who has been quite successful. More than his predecessor on a number of issues. But that's for another post.
The important thing here is they seem bent and intent on proving McCarthy right. There are commies in government, academia and Hollywood.
Once communists infiltrate the system, you should be able to recognize their jargon and lingo.
Nietzsche had the courage to call out philosophers who decided themselves with faulty notions and premises. And so we can apply a variant of this with our intellectual and political masters.
Words like 'democratic socialist' are left-wing weasel words. 'Hate speech' is a straw man for justifying censorship. And asking 'How universities should handle Trump?' is an appeal to authority - their authority.
Never mind it's basically a frivolous question rooted in hubris and stupidity.
Imagine the smug self-importance of a mind that legitimately poses such an idea!
In essence, it can be captured thusly: I don't like the results of the democratic process. Sometimes people need to be made to account for voting against their interests and we, the self-annointed intellectual and moral masters of all, must take charge!' Then they come up with stuff and solutions like censorship and lobotomies.
The bane of free society poses such a problematic conundrum for progressives you see?
That such a professor can ask such a retarded question and get it published - where else? - in a left-leaning publication like the Boston Globe directly, I argue, points to the lack of intellectual rigour and diversity in the college ranks.
There's a stale stink of rot lingering in its hall ways.
Do these so-called geniuses not see what they're advocating for? It's totalitarianism by other means. I fear them more than a President with a limited term.
These are the same people who squealed and squeaked 'OMG OMG Trump is going to take away all our rights because literally Nazi-Hitler-fascist!' and then turn around aaaannnd.....call for censorship and the removal of rights the second things don't go their way.
These are not principles. It's projection masking at principles. It's principals over principles.
It's all projection.
Here's my response to this question rooted in emotional drivel and remedial posturing:
Do nothing.
After all, does the left scold us for not accepting the 'democratic process'? Well, to the extent they interpret anyway. As we know full too well since 2016, progressives aren't too good at accepting election results that don't go their way. They claim Trump makes thousands of lies but this is projection on their part. Has there been a bigger lie perpetuated upon peoples than the Russia narrative and Mueller investigation? It's horrific theatre and does much more damage to the sanctity and integrity of a nation rooted in laws and respect - to say nothing of free speech - than anything Trump tweets. No?
Teach with honour and respect.
Not everyone agrees with you.
Attempting to challenge a freely and legally elected government is preposterous as it is obtuse. What good can come of insulting the votes of free peoples?
Ostensibly, students go to university to 'open their eyes' and expand their minds. To engage in thoughtful discourse on an intellectual journey.
And all that bull shit.
I can but personally conclude posing such immature and insufferable questions is the opposite of such, that is, it's rooted in impossibly parochialism and a misplaced sense of righteousness.
In other words, eat shit.
Given that a startling vast majority of faculties are left-leaning Democrats (cowards among them won't admit to being Marxist so we're left to read between their lines. Literate minds can spot a Marxist-Leninist comment), it's no surprise they've undertaken as their 'duty' to undermine a sitting President.
One who has been quite successful. More than his predecessor on a number of issues. But that's for another post.
The important thing here is they seem bent and intent on proving McCarthy right. There are commies in government, academia and Hollywood.
Once communists infiltrate the system, you should be able to recognize their jargon and lingo.
Nietzsche had the courage to call out philosophers who decided themselves with faulty notions and premises. And so we can apply a variant of this with our intellectual and political masters.
Words like 'democratic socialist' are left-wing weasel words. 'Hate speech' is a straw man for justifying censorship. And asking 'How universities should handle Trump?' is an appeal to authority - their authority.
Never mind it's basically a frivolous question rooted in hubris and stupidity.
Imagine the smug self-importance of a mind that legitimately poses such an idea!
In essence, it can be captured thusly: I don't like the results of the democratic process. Sometimes people need to be made to account for voting against their interests and we, the self-annointed intellectual and moral masters of all, must take charge!' Then they come up with stuff and solutions like censorship and lobotomies.
The bane of free society poses such a problematic conundrum for progressives you see?
That such a professor can ask such a retarded question and get it published - where else? - in a left-leaning publication like the Boston Globe directly, I argue, points to the lack of intellectual rigour and diversity in the college ranks.
There's a stale stink of rot lingering in its hall ways.
Do these so-called geniuses not see what they're advocating for? It's totalitarianism by other means. I fear them more than a President with a limited term.
These are the same people who squealed and squeaked 'OMG OMG Trump is going to take away all our rights because literally Nazi-Hitler-fascist!' and then turn around aaaannnd.....call for censorship and the removal of rights the second things don't go their way.
These are not principles. It's projection masking at principles. It's principals over principles.
It's all projection.
Here's my response to this question rooted in emotional drivel and remedial posturing:
Do nothing.
After all, does the left scold us for not accepting the 'democratic process'? Well, to the extent they interpret anyway. As we know full too well since 2016, progressives aren't too good at accepting election results that don't go their way. They claim Trump makes thousands of lies but this is projection on their part. Has there been a bigger lie perpetuated upon peoples than the Russia narrative and Mueller investigation? It's horrific theatre and does much more damage to the sanctity and integrity of a nation rooted in laws and respect - to say nothing of free speech - than anything Trump tweets. No?
Teach with honour and respect.
Not everyone agrees with you.
Attempting to challenge a freely and legally elected government is preposterous as it is obtuse. What good can come of insulting the votes of free peoples?
Ostensibly, students go to university to 'open their eyes' and expand their minds. To engage in thoughtful discourse on an intellectual journey.
And all that bull shit.
I can but personally conclude posing such immature and insufferable questions is the opposite of such, that is, it's rooted in impossibly parochialism and a misplaced sense of righteousness.
In other words, eat shit.
...although one must admit these progressive professors are still exercising their first amendment rights, even as they're condemning others for doing the same ...
ReplyDeleteI don't get notifications so I just saw this.
ReplyDeleteYes, they are. I would never argue otherwise. I will attack the content of their arguments.