It's months I've been meaning to bring up the topic of immigration in the United States and what it was in Rome.
Rather than sit and write my own insufficient musings, I defer to more capable of hands (Mark Damen).
"Not that things hadn't actually been that way for centuries, only by
late antiquity it was undeniable that, in spite of being called "Roman," the
Empire was, in fact, a multicultural enterprise. The pretense of a "Roman" Rome
had worn so thin it was impossible to maintain the illusion, for instance, that
everyone in the Empire could speak—or even wanted to
speak—Latin, the Romans' native tongue. Furthermore, it had
been ages since any emperor had even bothered to pretend his lineage could be
traced back to some ancestor who had arrived with Aeneas in Italy, an invented
history which was beginning to look rather silly when Spaniards and North
Africans had been steering the Empire for decades.
The stark truth was that by the fifth century CE—and indeed for many years
before that—a succession of dynamic and capable foreigners coming from all ends
of the Empire had kept Rome on its feet and these men were as "Roman" as anyone
born or bred in the capital. Barbarians were, and had been for a long time,
guarding and feeding the Empire, which made it all the more difficult to claim
they shouldn't also be running it. While three centuries earlier the Roman
satirist Juvenal had lamented, "I can't stand a Greek Rome," now Rome
wasn't merely Greek. It was Dacian and Egyptian and Syrian and, most of all,
ever more German by the day.
Thus, the sort of change which Rome had undergone—and which implies per
se a certain trajectory into the future—was all too clear: from a local
stronghold in Italy, to a multinational power, to the only superpower
in the known world, to a globalized conglomerate of many different peoples. Even
if Romans still held the title to the Empire and affected superiority over the
barbarians managing their domain, Roman possession of the lands around the
Mediterranean Sea was, for the most part, only on paper. The reality was that
the state was jointly owned, a participatory experiment which was by then
maintained with the sweat and blood of many races—and there were even more who
would have liked to sign up as "Roman" but they couldn't get in.
This begs the question, then, why so many
foreigners lived—and even more wanted to live—in Rome. Why did
barbarians in such numbers press to invade an empire in which they were treated
as second-class citizens no matter how hard they worked and collaborated? The
answer is easy. The Roman Empire in that day was a far safer place to live and
offered much better accommodations than the wild world outside its borders.
Roads and aqueducts and baths and amphitheaters and even taxes look good when
one is gazing in from outside where poverty, blood-feuds, disease and frost
reign supreme—the mild Mediterranean climate of southern Europe cannot be
discounted as a factor in the barbarians' desire to infiltrate sunny Rome—but
there was an even more impressive reason lurking beyond the borders of the
Empire, something anyone would want to avoid if at all possible: Huns!"
Quick thing about Latin. What not mentioned here, and wasn't necessary to the point, is there was Classical Latin which gave way to Vulgar Latin (practiced by soldiers, merchants etc. and not the elites) which, in turn, the Romance (Roman) language evolved starting with Italian (see chart here under classification).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.