I'm a proponent of cutting off the CBC from tax dollars because I simply don't like being forced to pay into something a) I don't use and b) have no say in the content even though taxes are used to fund it.
For example, I don't like Neil MacDonald as a writer. So why should I be forced to pay his salary?
Don Pittis is another.
I don't think it's too much for people who possess intellectual clarity to grasp socialism and the parasitical scumbag who ran it in Venezuela ran that country into the ground while plundering its wealth.
Chavez's daughter is worth billions.
I'll give you a second to process this. There should be one outcome as to why this is the case in your mind.
Hint: Her father was a lousy commie revolutionary. Maduro is that plus less smart.
Kids. It's not that difficult to play this game. Morales is doing the same in Bolivia. Castro did it to Cuba decimating that island while imprisoned and murdered people just like that psychopathic piece of shit Guevara did years before.
But let's keep blaming CIA coups, the greedy capitalist Americans and...now Trump.
Oof.
Moving on.
Alas, in the progressive world, see, it's not socialism or left-wing ideology that sank Venezuela.
Nope.
According to Pittis it was populism.
Yes, populism. Of course, it doesn't take a genius to figure it out why the left takes this position. Trump is considered a populist (even though some of his policies had origins in the DNC) and ergo populism is dangerous because Trump is dangerous and well, then they connect the dots in the bizarro world they inhabit and somehow think this is what destroyed Venezuela.
Never mind that when Venezuela was rolling along, they said it was because of socialism.
But these aren''t people with a particularly strong principled outlook and they'll just engage in sophistry the minute it suits them. Think how McCain went from 'racist crazy' to 'beloved hero' with the left.
His also pretty imaginative with the meaningless jargon. For example, "Economic populism" is a term he uses in this absurd piece in the CBC.
The populism of Bernie Sanders though - which is truly a dangerous mix of socialism and stupidity - is considered a-okay.
Look, I'm not going to break down the article. It's too sophomoric to waste time on.
It's just a really idiotic spin or derivative of 'it's not real socialism'.
'Useful lessons' my ass.
My point is tax payers who don't agree with this sort of faux-intellectual masturbation shouldn't be forced to pay for this garbage.
The CBC is indispensable you say? Have a pledge drive and make people pay who agree voluntarily pay for it.
All the power to the CBC and the people who support it.
Just leave me the fuck out of this shit.
****
Bonus:
Chuck Todd publishes his own nonsense.
"...Some of the wealthiest members of the media are not reporters from mainstream outlets. Figures such as Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge, and the trio of Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Laura Ingraham have attained wealth and power by exploiting the fears of older white people. They are thriving financially by exploiting the very same free-press umbrella they seem determined to undermine."
What a smug, mendacious, presumptive, paternalistic, arrogant piece of shit Todd is.
All I see is naked projection. It's HIS side (whatever it is at this point. They're just lying assholes to me anyway at this point) doing all the fear-mongering. And if you don't see this, you're not paying close enough attention.
I would have taken him seriously if he made a general overall assertion about the state of journalism pointing out the same bull shit that goes on at ABC, CBS, CNN, NYT and his own god damn network who employed fucking Brian Williams and have repeatedly been caught lying or stretching the truth.
For example, I don't like Neil MacDonald as a writer. So why should I be forced to pay his salary?
Don Pittis is another.
I don't think it's too much for people who possess intellectual clarity to grasp socialism and the parasitical scumbag who ran it in Venezuela ran that country into the ground while plundering its wealth.
Chavez's daughter is worth billions.
I'll give you a second to process this. There should be one outcome as to why this is the case in your mind.
Hint: Her father was a lousy commie revolutionary. Maduro is that plus less smart.
Kids. It's not that difficult to play this game. Morales is doing the same in Bolivia. Castro did it to Cuba decimating that island while imprisoned and murdered people just like that psychopathic piece of shit Guevara did years before.
But let's keep blaming CIA coups, the greedy capitalist Americans and...now Trump.
Oof.
Moving on.
Alas, in the progressive world, see, it's not socialism or left-wing ideology that sank Venezuela.
Nope.
According to Pittis it was populism.
Yes, populism. Of course, it doesn't take a genius to figure it out why the left takes this position. Trump is considered a populist (even though some of his policies had origins in the DNC) and ergo populism is dangerous because Trump is dangerous and well, then they connect the dots in the bizarro world they inhabit and somehow think this is what destroyed Venezuela.
Never mind that when Venezuela was rolling along, they said it was because of socialism.
But these aren''t people with a particularly strong principled outlook and they'll just engage in sophistry the minute it suits them. Think how McCain went from 'racist crazy' to 'beloved hero' with the left.
His also pretty imaginative with the meaningless jargon. For example, "Economic populism" is a term he uses in this absurd piece in the CBC.
The populism of Bernie Sanders though - which is truly a dangerous mix of socialism and stupidity - is considered a-okay.
Look, I'm not going to break down the article. It's too sophomoric to waste time on.
It's just a really idiotic spin or derivative of 'it's not real socialism'.
'Useful lessons' my ass.
My point is tax payers who don't agree with this sort of faux-intellectual masturbation shouldn't be forced to pay for this garbage.
The CBC is indispensable you say? Have a pledge drive and make people pay who agree voluntarily pay for it.
All the power to the CBC and the people who support it.
Just leave me the fuck out of this shit.
****
Bonus:
Chuck Todd publishes his own nonsense.
"...Some of the wealthiest members of the media are not reporters from mainstream outlets. Figures such as Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge, and the trio of Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, and Laura Ingraham have attained wealth and power by exploiting the fears of older white people. They are thriving financially by exploiting the very same free-press umbrella they seem determined to undermine."
What a smug, mendacious, presumptive, paternalistic, arrogant piece of shit Todd is.
All I see is naked projection. It's HIS side (whatever it is at this point. They're just lying assholes to me anyway at this point) doing all the fear-mongering. And if you don't see this, you're not paying close enough attention.
I would have taken him seriously if he made a general overall assertion about the state of journalism pointing out the same bull shit that goes on at ABC, CBS, CNN, NYT and his own god damn network who employed fucking Brian Williams and have repeatedly been caught lying or stretching the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Mysterious and anonymous comments as well as those laced with cyanide and ad hominen attacks will be deleted. Thank you for your attention, chumps.